IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i21p11808-d664843.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Acid Soils Nitrogen Leaching and Buffering Capacity Mitigation Using Charcoal and Sago Bark Ash

Author

Listed:
  • Nur Hidayah Hamidi

    (Department of Crop Science, Faculty of Agricultural Science and Forestry, Bintulu Campus, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Bintulu 97008, Malaysia)

  • Osumanu Haruna Ahmed

    (Department of Forestry Science, Faculty of Agricultural Science and Forestry, Bintulu Campus, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Bintulu 97008, Malaysia
    Institut Ekosains Borneo (IEB), Sarawak Campus, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Bintulu 97008, Malaysia
    Institute of Tropical Agriculture and Food Security (ITAFoS), Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia)

  • Latifah Omar

    (Department of Crop Science, Faculty of Agricultural Science and Forestry, Bintulu Campus, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Bintulu 97008, Malaysia
    Institut Ekosains Borneo (IEB), Sarawak Campus, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Bintulu 97008, Malaysia)

  • Huck Ywih Ch’ng

    (Faculty of Agro-Based Industry, Jeli Campus, Universiti Malaysia Kelantan, Kelantan 17600, Malaysia)

  • Prisca Divra Johan

    (Department of Crop Science, Faculty of Agricultural Science and Forestry, Bintulu Campus, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Bintulu 97008, Malaysia)

  • Puvan Paramisparam

    (Department of Crop Science, Faculty of Agricultural Science and Forestry, Bintulu Campus, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Bintulu 97008, Malaysia)

  • Mohamadu Boyie Jalloh

    (Crop Production Programme, Faculty of Sustainable Agriculture, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Sandakan Branch, Locked Bag No.3, Sandakan 90509, Malaysia)

Abstract

Soil acidity compromises agricultural output in tropical acid soils. Highly weathered tropical acidic soils are characterized by low pH, organic matter, nutrient availability, but high aluminium and iron concentration. Hence, N availability becomes a limiting factor in such soils. To this end, these leaching and pH buffering capacity studies were conducted to determine the effects of co-application of charcoal and sago bark ash on the N leaching or retention and pH buffering capacity of acid soils. The soil leaching experiment was conducted for 30 days by spraying distilled water to each container with soil such that the leachates were collected for analysis. The rate of urea used was fixed at 100% of the recommended rate. The rates of charcoal and sago bark ash were varied by 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100%, respectively, of the recommended rates. The pH buffering capacity was calculated as the negative reciprocal of the slope of the linear regression. The leaching study revealed that the combined use of charcoal, sago bark ash, and urea does not only reduce leaching of NH 4 + and NO 3 − but the approach also improves soil pH, total C, and soil exchangeable NH 4 + . This effect is related to the fact that the sago bark ash deprotonates the functional groups of charcoal because of its neutralizing components such as Ca, Mg, Na, and K ions. As a result, the combined use of charcoal and sago bark ash was able to retain NH 4 + in the soil. The carbonates in the sago bark ash and functional groups of charcoal improve pH buffering capacity. Thus, the combined use of charcoal and sago bark ash improved soil exchangeable NH 4 + , soil pH, and soil total C, but reduced exchangeable acidity and amount of NH 4 + leached out from soil. This study will be further evaluated in a pot trial to confirm the results of the present findings.

Suggested Citation

  • Nur Hidayah Hamidi & Osumanu Haruna Ahmed & Latifah Omar & Huck Ywih Ch’ng & Prisca Divra Johan & Puvan Paramisparam & Mohamadu Boyie Jalloh, 2021. "Acid Soils Nitrogen Leaching and Buffering Capacity Mitigation Using Charcoal and Sago Bark Ash," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-17, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:11808-:d:664843
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/11808/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/11808/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ben Bond-Lamberty & Vanessa L. Bailey & Min Chen & Christopher M. Gough & Rodrigo Vargas, 2018. "Globally rising soil heterotrophic respiration over recent decades," Nature, Nature, vol. 560(7716), pages 80-83, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hui Wei & Jiayue Yang & Ziqiang Liu & Jiaen Zhang, 2022. "Data Integration Analysis Indicates That Soil Texture and pH Greatly Influence the Acid Buffering Capacity of Global Surface Soils," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-11, March.
    2. Maru Ali & Osumanu Haruna Ahmed & Mohamadu Boyie Jalloh & Walter Charles Primus & Adiza Alhassan Musah & Ji Feng Ng, 2023. "Co-Composted Chicken Litter Biochar Increases Soil Nutrient Availability and Yield of Oryza sativa L," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-20, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hui Wei & Yalan Liu & Huimin Xiang & Jiaen Zhang & Saifei Li & Jiayue Yang, 2019. "Soil pH Responses to Simulated Acid Rain Leaching in Three Agricultural Soils," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
    2. Jinshi Jian & Vanessa Bailey & Kalyn Dorheim & Alexandra G. Konings & Dalei Hao & Alexey N. Shiklomanov & Abigail Snyder & Meredith Steele & Munemasa Teramoto & Rodrigo Vargas & Ben Bond-Lamberty, 2022. "Historically inconsistent productivity and respiration fluxes in the global terrestrial carbon cycle," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-9, December.
    3. Xue Chen & Haibo Hu & Qi Wang & Xia Wang & Bing Ma, 2024. "Exploring the Factors Affecting Terrestrial Soil Respiration in Global Warming Manipulation Experiments Based on Meta-Analysis," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-15, September.
    4. Ee Ling Ng & Junling Zhang, 2019. "The Search for the Meaning of Soil Health: Lessons from Human Health and Ecosystem Health," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-6, July.
    5. Kailiang Yu & Philippe Ciais & Sonia I. Seneviratne & Zhihua Liu & Han Y. H. Chen & Jonathan Barichivich & Craig D. Allen & Hui Yang & Yuanyuan Huang & Ashley P. Ballantyne, 2022. "Field-based tree mortality constraint reduces estimates of model-projected forest carbon sinks," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-9, December.
    6. Charlotte J. Alster & Allycia Laar & Jordan P. Goodrich & Vickery L. Arcus & Julie R. Deslippe & Alexis J. Marshall & Louis A. Schipper, 2023. "Quantifying thermal adaptation of soil microbial respiration," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.
    7. Alon Nissan & Uria Alcolombri & Nadav Peleg & Nir Galili & Joaquin Jimenez-Martinez & Peter Molnar & Markus Holzner, 2023. "Global warming accelerates soil heterotrophic respiration," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, December.
    8. Ronan Connolly & Michael Connolly & Robert M. Carter & Willie Soon, 2020. "How Much Human-Caused Global Warming Should We Expect with Business-As-Usual (BAU) Climate Policies? A Semi-Empirical Assessment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-51, March.
    9. Grafström, Jonas & Sandström, Christian, 2021. "Ratio Working Paper No. 352: More from less? Economic growth and sustainability in Sweden," Ratio Working Papers 352, The Ratio Institute.
    10. Hongru Sun & Guangsheng Zhou & Zhenzhu Xu & Yuhui Wang & Xiaodi Liu & Hongying Yu & Quanhui Ma & Bingrui Jia, 2020. "Temperature sensitivity increases with decreasing soil carbon quality in forest ecosystems across northeast China," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 160(3), pages 373-384, June.
    11. Egor A. Dyukarev & Sergey A. Kurakov, 2023. "Response of Bare Soil Respiration to Air and Soil Temperature Variations According to Different Models: A Case Study of an Urban Grassland," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-20, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:11808-:d:664843. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.