IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2019i1p280-d303246.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Soil pH Responses to Simulated Acid Rain Leaching in Three Agricultural Soils

Author

Listed:
  • Hui Wei

    (College of Natural Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
    Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Eco-Circular Agriculture, Guangzhou 510642, China
    Key Laboratory of Agro-Environment in the Tropics, Ministry of Agriculture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China)

  • Yalan Liu

    (College of Natural Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China)

  • Huimin Xiang

    (College of Natural Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
    Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Eco-Circular Agriculture, Guangzhou 510642, China
    Key Laboratory of Agro-Environment in the Tropics, Ministry of Agriculture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China)

  • Jiaen Zhang

    (College of Natural Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
    Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Eco-Circular Agriculture, Guangzhou 510642, China
    Key Laboratory of Agro-Environment in the Tropics, Ministry of Agriculture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China)

  • Saifei Li

    (College of Natural Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China)

  • Jiayue Yang

    (College of Natural Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China)

Abstract

Soil has the nature of acidity and alkalinity, mostly indicated by soil pH that could greatly affect soil ecological processes and functions. With exogenous inputs of acidic materials (such as acid rain), soils may more or less resist to maintain their pH levels within specific thresholds by various buffering processes. It has been well established that soil properties such as cation exchange capacity (CEC), soil organic matter (SOM), and clay content play important roles in mitigating the effects of acid inputs, but the factors varied across soils. This microcosm experiment was conducted to investigate changes in the soil pH and quantitatively estimate the critical pH threshold of simulated acid rain for three highly weathered soils (red soil, lateritic red soil, and latosol) that are typical soil types widely distributed across the world’s subtropical and tropical climatic zones, as well as important influential factors, after continuously adding different levels of simulated acid rain on the surface of soil cores. The results showed that the change in the soil pH was not significantly different among the three soils, although it was exponentially related to soil CEC and clay content. Resultantly, the latosol that had high soil CEC and clay content was more resistant to simulated acid rain, especially when relatively weak simulated acid rain treatments were applied. The lateritic red soil that contained the lowest soil CEC and clay content showed the greatest decline in the soil pH under the strongest simulated acid rain treatment of pH being 2.5. Furthermore, we estimated the critical pH threshold of simulated acid rain for the three soils and observed that it was considerably different among the soils. Surprisingly, the pH threshold of simulated acid rain was also positively related to the soil CEC and clay content, therefore making the highest pH threshold in the latosol. Our results imply that soil CEC and clay content may play critical roles in the soil acid-buffering processes from two aspects; it could not only contribute to the soil acid-buffering capacity, but also affect the threshold of acidity of acid rain below which abrupt soil acidification may occur.

Suggested Citation

  • Hui Wei & Yalan Liu & Huimin Xiang & Jiaen Zhang & Saifei Li & Jiayue Yang, 2019. "Soil pH Responses to Simulated Acid Rain Leaching in Three Agricultural Soils," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2019:i:1:p:280-:d:303246
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/1/280/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/1/280/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ben Bond-Lamberty & Vanessa L. Bailey & Min Chen & Christopher M. Gough & Rodrigo Vargas, 2018. "Globally rising soil heterotrophic respiration over recent decades," Nature, Nature, vol. 560(7716), pages 80-83, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hui Wei & Jiayue Yang & Ziqiang Liu & Jiaen Zhang, 2022. "Data Integration Analysis Indicates That Soil Texture and pH Greatly Influence the Acid Buffering Capacity of Global Surface Soils," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-11, March.
    2. Yanling Liu & Meng Zhang & Yu Li & Yarong Zhang & Xingcheng Huang & Yehua Yang & Huaqing Zhu & Han Xiong & Taiming Jiang, 2023. "Influence of Nitrogen Fertilizer Application on Soil Acidification Characteristics of Tea Plantations in Karst Areas of Southwest China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-14, April.
    3. Xiansheng Xie & Jianfei Qiu & Xinxin Feng & Yanlin Hou & Shuojin Wang & Shugang Jia & Shutian Liu & Xianda Hou & Sen Dou, 2022. "Spatial Distribution and Estimation Model of Soil pH in Coastal Eastern China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-16, December.
    4. Mehnaz Mosharrof & Md. Kamal Uddin & Shamshuddin Jusop & Muhammad Firdaus Sulaiman & S. M. Shamsuzzaman & Ahmad Numery Ashfaqul Haque, 2021. "Changes in Acidic Soil Chemical Properties and Carbon Dioxide Emission Due to Biochar and Lime Treatments," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-20, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jinshi Jian & Vanessa Bailey & Kalyn Dorheim & Alexandra G. Konings & Dalei Hao & Alexey N. Shiklomanov & Abigail Snyder & Meredith Steele & Munemasa Teramoto & Rodrigo Vargas & Ben Bond-Lamberty, 2022. "Historically inconsistent productivity and respiration fluxes in the global terrestrial carbon cycle," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-9, December.
    2. Xue Chen & Haibo Hu & Qi Wang & Xia Wang & Bing Ma, 2024. "Exploring the Factors Affecting Terrestrial Soil Respiration in Global Warming Manipulation Experiments Based on Meta-Analysis," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-15, September.
    3. Nur Hidayah Hamidi & Osumanu Haruna Ahmed & Latifah Omar & Huck Ywih Ch’ng & Prisca Divra Johan & Puvan Paramisparam & Mohamadu Boyie Jalloh, 2021. "Acid Soils Nitrogen Leaching and Buffering Capacity Mitigation Using Charcoal and Sago Bark Ash," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-17, October.
    4. Ee Ling Ng & Junling Zhang, 2019. "The Search for the Meaning of Soil Health: Lessons from Human Health and Ecosystem Health," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-6, July.
    5. Kailiang Yu & Philippe Ciais & Sonia I. Seneviratne & Zhihua Liu & Han Y. H. Chen & Jonathan Barichivich & Craig D. Allen & Hui Yang & Yuanyuan Huang & Ashley P. Ballantyne, 2022. "Field-based tree mortality constraint reduces estimates of model-projected forest carbon sinks," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-9, December.
    6. Charlotte J. Alster & Allycia Laar & Jordan P. Goodrich & Vickery L. Arcus & Julie R. Deslippe & Alexis J. Marshall & Louis A. Schipper, 2023. "Quantifying thermal adaptation of soil microbial respiration," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.
    7. Alon Nissan & Uria Alcolombri & Nadav Peleg & Nir Galili & Joaquin Jimenez-Martinez & Peter Molnar & Markus Holzner, 2023. "Global warming accelerates soil heterotrophic respiration," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, December.
    8. Ronan Connolly & Michael Connolly & Robert M. Carter & Willie Soon, 2020. "How Much Human-Caused Global Warming Should We Expect with Business-As-Usual (BAU) Climate Policies? A Semi-Empirical Assessment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-51, March.
    9. Grafström, Jonas & Sandström, Christian, 2021. "Ratio Working Paper No. 352: More from less? Economic growth and sustainability in Sweden," Ratio Working Papers 352, The Ratio Institute.
    10. Hongru Sun & Guangsheng Zhou & Zhenzhu Xu & Yuhui Wang & Xiaodi Liu & Hongying Yu & Quanhui Ma & Bingrui Jia, 2020. "Temperature sensitivity increases with decreasing soil carbon quality in forest ecosystems across northeast China," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 160(3), pages 373-384, June.
    11. Egor A. Dyukarev & Sergey A. Kurakov, 2023. "Response of Bare Soil Respiration to Air and Soil Temperature Variations According to Different Models: A Case Study of an Urban Grassland," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-20, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2019:i:1:p:280-:d:303246. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.