IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i21p11565-d660298.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An insight on B2B Firms in the Age of Digitalization and Paperless Processes

Author

Listed:
  • José Oliveira

    (Instituto Superior Politécnico Gaya (ISPGAYA), 4400-103 Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal)

  • António Azevedo

    (School of Economics and Management, University of Minho, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal)

  • João J. Ferreira

    (Department of Management and Economics & NECE—Research Unit in Business Sciences, University of Beira Interior, 6201-001 Covilhã, Portugal)

  • Sofia Gomes

    (REMIT—Research on Economics, Management and Information Technologies, University Portucalense, 4200-072 Porto, Portugal)

  • João M. Lopes

    (Miguel Torga Institute of Higher Education & University of Beira Interior & NECE—Research Unit in Business Sciences, 6201-001 Covilhã, Portugal)

Abstract

In recent years and due to market demand and environmental regulations, firms have been changing their procedures regarding document production, handling, and filling. There has been a paradigm change in document sustention in order to attain such changes, from paper-based to electronic forms, resulting in the Digitization and Paperless Office Program (DPOP). The literature on digitization and paperless processes is profuse; nonetheless, it is outdated, uses only single or multiple case study approaches, and is limited to specific industries, such as healthcare or higher education. To overcome this gap, this research analyses the current implementation of the DPOP in five major sectors by using a country scale approach; consequently, this research study contributes to strengthening the literature in this area of knowledge. The methodology used is quantitative and is based on a questionnaire distributed to the most important economic sectors (education, health, trade, industry, and services) in Portugal. The results show that a DPOP positively impacts companies, as it increases profitability and, in most cases, is a sine qua non condition for negotiating with clients. Additionally, it favours companies’ image, reduces costs, and contributes to environmental sustainability. This research provides new insights into how firms using a DPOP may contribute to dematerialization and paper consumption reduction. It is also original as it covers multiple sectors using a country approach.

Suggested Citation

  • José Oliveira & António Azevedo & João J. Ferreira & Sofia Gomes & João M. Lopes, 2021. "An insight on B2B Firms in the Age of Digitalization and Paperless Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-21, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:11565-:d:660298
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/11565/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/11565/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ricardo Alves & Cátia Caneiras & Ana Isabel Santos & Patricia Barbosa & João Cardoso & Paulo Caseiro & Maria João Vitorino & João Pereira & Ana Escoval, 2020. "Medical Electronic Prescription for Home Respiratory Care Services (PEM-CRD) at a Portuguese University Tertiary Care Centre (2014–2018): A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-11, November.
    2. Vandermerwe, Sandra & Rada, Juan, 1988. "Servitization of business: Adding value by adding services," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 6(4), pages 314-324, December.
    3. Kokho Sit, Jason & Hoang, Anna & Inversini, Alessandro, 2018. "Showrooming and retail opportunities: A qualitative investigation via a consumer-experience lens," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 163-174.
    4. Mar’atus Sholihah & Tatsuru Maezono & Yuya Mitake & Yoshiki Shimomura, 2020. "Formulating Service-Oriented Strategies for Servitization of Manufacturing Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-30, November.
    5. Dmitry Ivanov & Alexandre Dolgui & Boris Sokolov, 2019. "The impact of digital technology and Industry 4.0 on the ripple effect and supply chain risk analytics," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(3), pages 829-846, February.
    6. Sophie I. Hallstedt & Ola Isaksson & Anna Öhrwall Rönnbäck, 2020. "The Need for New Product Development Capabilities from Digitalization, Sustainability, and Servitization Trends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-26, December.
    7. Gibson, Clark C. & Ostrom, Elinor & Ahn, T. K., 2000. "The concept of scale and the human dimensions of global change: a survey," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 217-239, February.
    8. Magee, Christopher L. & Devezas, Tessaleno C., 2017. "A simple extension of dematerialization theory: Incorporation of technical progress and the rebound effect," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 196-205.
    9. Erik Dietzenbacher & Bart Los & Robert Stehrer & Marcel Timmer & Gaaitzen de Vries, 2013. "The Construction Of World Input-Output Tables In The Wiod Project," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 71-98, March.
    10. Paulo Duarte Silveira & Susana Galvão & Paulo Bogas, 2018. "The Influence of Customer Retention Time on Slogan Recall and Recognition: An Empirical Study," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(1), pages 3-13.
    11. Bais, Anna Liza S. & Lauk, Christian & Kastner, Thomas & Erb, Karlheinz, 2015. "Global patterns and trends of wood harvest and use between 1990 and 2010," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 326-337.
    12. Christopher D. Taylor & Benjamin Gully & Andrea N. Sánchez & Edward Rode & Arun S. Agarwal, 2016. "Towards Materials Sustainability through Materials Stewardship," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-16, October.
    13. Pothen, Frank & Schymura, Michael, 2015. "Bigger cakes with fewer ingredients? A comparison of material use of the world economy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 109-121.
    14. Siami, Navid & Winter, Ralph A., 2021. "Jevons’ paradox revisited: Implications for climate change," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    15. Ayres, Robert U. & van den Bergh, Jeroen C.J.M., 2005. "A theory of economic growth with material/energy resources and dematerialization: Interaction of three growth mechanisms," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(1), pages 96-118, October.
    16. Holmlund, Maria & Kowalkowski, Christian & Biggemann, Sergio, 2016. "Organizational behavior in innovation, marketing, and purchasing in business service contexts—An agenda for academic inquiry," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(7), pages 2457-2462.
    17. Magnus Jiborn & Viktoras Kulionis & Astrid Kander, 2020. "Consumption versus Technology: Drivers of Global Carbon Emissions 2000–2014," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-12, January.
    18. Youngjin Yoo & Ola Henfridsson & Kalle Lyytinen, 2010. "Research Commentary ---The New Organizing Logic of Digital Innovation: An Agenda for Information Systems Research," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(4), pages 724-735, December.
    19. Bay Arinze & Murugan Anandarajan, 2010. "Factors that Determine the Adoption of Cloud Computing: A Global Perspective," International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems (IJEIS), IGI Global, vol. 6(4), pages 55-68, October.
    20. Rajan Varadarajan, 2017. "Innovating for sustainability: a framework for sustainable innovations and a model of sustainable innovations orientation," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 14-36, January.
    21. Bruno Kestemont & Marc Van Kerckhove, 2010. "Material flow accounting of an Indian village," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/292649, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    22. Qiang Xu & Jinghui Yu & Jianxin Xu & Guangxi Zhang & Canying Liang, 2021. "How business model innovation overcomes barriers during manufacturers’ servitization transformation: a case study of two top piano manufacturers in China," Asia Pacific Business Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(3), pages 378-404, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bokolo Anthony Jnr & Sobah Abbas Petersen, 2023. "Validation of a Developed Enterprise Architecture Framework for Digitalisation of Smart Cities: a Mixed-Mode Approach," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 14(2), pages 1702-1733, June.
    2. Angelos I. Stoumpos & Fotis Kitsios & Michael A. Talias, 2023. "Digital Transformation in Healthcare: Technology Acceptance and Its Applications," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-44, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Löschel, Andreas & Pothen, Frank & Schymura, Michael, 2015. "Peeling the onion: Analyzing aggregate, national and sectoral energy intensity in the European Union," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(S1), pages 63-75.
    2. Kaltenegger, Oliver & Löschel, Andreas & Pothen, Frank, 2017. "The effect of globalisation on energy footprints: Disentangling the links of global value chains," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(S1), pages 148-168.
    3. Alberto de la Calle & Inmaculada Freije & Aitor Oyarbide, 2021. "Digital Product–Service Innovation and Sustainability: A Multiple-Case Study in the Capital Goods Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-29, June.
    4. Vendrell-Herrero, Ferran & Bustinza, Oscar F. & Opazo-Basaez, Marco, 2021. "Information technologies and product-service innovation: The moderating role of service R&D team structure," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 673-687.
    5. Wang, Nan & Wan, Jiahao & Ma, Zhenzhong & Zhou, Yan & Chen, Jin, 2023. "How digital platform capabilities improve sustainable innovation performance of firms: The mediating role of open innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    6. Green, Maxwell H. & Davies, Philip & Ng, Irene C.L., 2017. "Two strands of servitization: A thematic analysis of traditional and customer co-created servitization and future research directions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 40-53.
    7. Mosch, Philipp & Schweikl, Stefan & Obermaier, Robert, 2021. "Trapped in the supply chain? Digital servitization strategies and power relations in the case of an industrial technology supplier," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    8. Diogo Pombo & Mário Franco, 2023. "A qualitative investigation of infusing products with service via strategic alliances among SMEs: a case of servitization," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 17(2), pages 529-555, June.
    9. Wang, H. & Ang, B.W. & Su, Bin, 2017. "Assessing drivers of economy-wide energy use and emissions: IDA versus SDA," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 585-599.
    10. João Leitão & Joaquim Ferreira, 2021. "Dynamic Effects of Material Production and Environmental Sustainability on Economic Vitality Indicators: A Panel VAR Approach," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-20, February.
    11. Asada, Raphael & Stern, Tobias, 2018. "Competitive Bioeconomy? Comparing Bio-based and Non-bio-based Primary Sectors of the World," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 120-128.
    12. Chankook Park, 2022. "Expansion of servitization in the energy sector and its implications," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(4), July.
    13. Yong Chen & Zhengjie Wu & Wenchao Yi & Bingjia Wang & Jianhua Yao & Zhi Pei & Jiaoliao Chen, 2022. "Bibliometric Method for Manufacturing Servitization: A Review and Future Research Directions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-26, July.
    14. Jichang Zhang & Jing Long & Alexandra Martina Eugenie von Schaewen, 2021. "How Does Digital Transformation Improve Organizational Resilience?—Findings from PLS-SEM and fsQCA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-22, October.
    15. Michael Landesmann & Sandra M. Leitner & Robert Stehrer, 2015. "Competitiveness of the European Economy," wiiw Research Reports 401, The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw.
    16. Dal Mas, Francesca & Massaro, Maurizio & Rippa, Pierluigi & Secundo, Giustina, 2023. "The challenges of digital transformation in healthcare: An interdisciplinary literature review, framework, and future research agenda," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    17. Wim Coreynen & Arjen van Witteloostuijn & Johanna Vanderstraeten, 2021. "Toward Servitized Research: An Integrated Approach for Sustainable Product-Service Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-21, July.
    18. Bustinza, Oscar F. & Vendrell-Herrero, Ferran & Baines, Tim, 2017. "Service implementation in manufacturing: An organisational transformation perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 1-8.
    19. Li, Zhongshun & Xie, Weihong & Wang, Zhong & Wang, Yongjian & Huang, Danyu, 2023. "Antecedent configurations and performance of business models of intelligent manufacturing enterprises," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    20. Pothen, Frank, 2017. "A structural decomposition of global Raw Material Consumption," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 154-165.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:11565-:d:660298. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.