IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i20p11305-d655258.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developing a Parametric Cash Flow Forecasting Model for Complex Infrastructure Projects: A Comparative Study

Author

Listed:
  • Mahir Msawil

    (School of Energy, Geoscience, Infrastructure and Society, Heriot Watt University Dubai Campus, Dubai Knowledge Park, Dubai P.O. Box 38103, United Arab Emirates)

  • Faris Elghaish

    (School of Natural and Built Environment, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast BT9 5AG, UK)

  • Krisanthi Seneviratne

    (School of Engineering, Design and Built Environment, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW 2751, Australia)

  • Stephen McIlwaine

    (School of Natural and Built Environment, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast BT9 5AG, UK)

Abstract

Forecasting the cash flow for infrastructure projects has not received much attention in the existing models. Moreover, disregarding the cost flow behaviour and proposing models that entail a relatively high dimensionality of inputs have been the main drawbacks of the existing models. This study proposes a heuristic cash flow forecasting (CFF) model for infrastructure projects, and it explores the underlying behaviour of the cost flow. The proposed model was validated by adopting a case study approach,the actual cost flow datasets were mined from a verified data system. The results invalidated the employment of a dominant heuristic rule with regard to a cost-flow-time relationship in infrastructure projects. On the other hand, a mathematical parameter-based comparison between the trends analysed from previous studies revealed that the cost flows of infrastructure projects procured through a design-bid-build (D-B-B) route behaved in a similar manner to building projects procured through a construction management route. This research contributes to the body of knowledge providing a method to enable infrastructure contractors to accurately forecast the required working capital through adding a new dimension for project classification by coining the term “ the quaternary flow percentage ”. In addition, this study indicates the importance of identifying the impact of root risks on the individual cost flow components rather than on the aggregated cost flow, which is a recommendation for future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Mahir Msawil & Faris Elghaish & Krisanthi Seneviratne & Stephen McIlwaine, 2021. "Developing a Parametric Cash Flow Forecasting Model for Complex Infrastructure Projects: A Comparative Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-26, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:20:p:11305-:d:655258
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/20/11305/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/20/11305/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Taleb, Nassim Nicholas, 2019. "How much data do you need? An operational, pre-asymptotic metric for fat-tailedness," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 677-686.
    2. Lauri Koskela, 2017. "Why is management research irrelevant?," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(1-2), pages 4-23, February.
    3. Ashraf Elazouni, 2009. "Heuristic method for multi-project finance-based scheduling," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(2), pages 199-211.
    4. Huan Neng Chiu & Deng Maw Tsai, 2002. "An efficient search procedure for the resource-constrained multi-project scheduling problem with discounted cash flows," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 55-66.
    5. Bent Flyvbjerg, 2009. "Survival of the unfittest: why the worst infrastructure gets built--and what we can do about it," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 25(3), pages 344-367, Autumn.
    6. A. H. Boussabaine & A. P. Kaka, 1998. "A neural networks approach for cost flow forecasting," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(4), pages 471-479.
    7. Cheng, Min-Yuan & Cao, Minh-Tu & Herianto, Jason Ghorman, 2020. "Symbiotic organisms search-optimized deep learning technique for mapping construction cash flow considering complexity of project," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    8. Yuvraj Gajpal & Ashraf Elazouni, 2015. "Enhanced heuristic for finance-based scheduling of construction projects," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(7), pages 531-553, July.
    9. Farzad Khosrowshahi & Amir Alani, 2003. "A model for smoothing time-series data in construction," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(5), pages 483-494.
    10. Yi Su & Gunnar Lucko, 2015. "Synthetic cash flow model with singularity functions for unbalanced bidding scenarios," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(1), pages 35-54, January.
    11. Henry A. Odeyinka & John Lowe & Ammar P. Kaka, 2013. "Artificial neural network cost flow risk assessment model," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(5), pages 423-439, May.
    12. A. H. Boussabaine & Taha Elhag, 1999. "Applying fuzzy techniques to cash flow analysis," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(6), pages 745-755.
    13. Dominic D. Ahiaga-Dagbui & Simon D. Smith, 2014. "Dealing with construction cost overruns using data mining," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(7-8), pages 682-694, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cheng, Min-Yuan & Cao, Minh-Tu & Herianto, Jason Ghorman, 2020. "Symbiotic organisms search-optimized deep learning technique for mapping construction cash flow considering complexity of project," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    2. Qingbin Cui & Makarand Hastak & Daniel Halpin, 2010. "Systems analysis of project cash flow management strategies," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(4), pages 361-376.
    3. Shu-Shun Liu & Chang-Jung Wang, 2009. "Two-stage profit optimization model for linear scheduling problems considering cash flow," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(11), pages 1023-1037.
    4. Yuvraj Gajpal & Ashraf Elazouni, 2015. "Enhanced heuristic for finance-based scheduling of construction projects," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(7), pages 531-553, July.
    5. Love, Peter E.D. & Ahiaga-Dagbui, Dominic D., 2018. "Debunking fake news in a post-truth era: The plausible untruths of cost underestimation in transport infrastructure projects," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 357-368.
    6. Yonggu Kim & Keeyoung Shin & Joseph Ahn & Eul-Bum Lee, 2017. "Probabilistic Cash Flow-Based Optimal Investment Timing Using Two-Color Rainbow Options Valuation for Economic Sustainability Appraisement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-16, October.
    7. Love, Peter E.D. & Ika, Lavagnon A. & Ahiaga-Dagbui, Dominic D., 2019. "On de-bunking ‘fake news’ in a post truth era: Why does the Planning Fallacy explanation for cost overruns fall short?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 397-408.
    8. Maria Börjesson & Jonas Eliasson, 2019. "Should values of time be differentiated?," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(3), pages 357-375, May.
    9. Al-Noor Abdullah & Sanzidur Rahman, 2021. "Social Impacts of a Mega-Dam Project as Perceived by Local, Resettled and Displaced Communities: A Case Study of Merowe Dam, Sudan," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-32, September.
    10. Plakandaras, Vasilios & Papadimitriou, Theophilos & Gogas, Periklis, 2019. "Forecasting transportation demand for the U.S. market," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 195-214.
    11. Winkler, Lorenz & Kilic, Onur A. & Veldman, Jasper, 2022. "Collaboration in the offshore wind farm decommissioning supply chain," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    12. Andrew Feltenstein & Nour Abdul-Razzak & Jeffrey Condon & Biplab Kumar Datta, 2015. "Tax Evasion, the Provision of Public Infrastructure and Growth: A General Equilibrium Approach to Two Very Different Countries, Egypt and Mauritius," Journal of African Economies, Centre for the Study of African Economies, vol. 24(suppl_2), pages 43-72.
    13. Asplund, Disa & Eliasson, Jonas, 2016. "Does uncertainty make cost-benefit analyses pointless?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 195-205.
    14. Hartmann, Sönke & Briskorn, Dirk, 2010. "A survey of variants and extensions of the resource-constrained project scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(1), pages 1-14, November.
    15. Tsekeris, Theodore, 2014. "Multi-sectoral interdependencies of regional public infrastructure investments," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 263-272.
    16. Aigner, Rafael & Weber, Katharina, 2017. "The Fehmarn Belt duopoly – Can the ferry compete with a tunnel?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 1-15.
    17. Chiappinelli, Olga, 2020. "Decentralization and Public Procurement Performance: New Evidence from Italy," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 58(2), pages 856-880.
    18. Atif Ansar & Bent Flyvbjerg & Alexander Budzier & Daniel Lunn, 2016. "Does infrastructure investment lead to economic growth or economic fragility? Evidence from China," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 32(3), pages 360-390.
    19. Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés, 2017. "The revenge of the places that don’t matter (and what to do about it)," CEPR Discussion Papers 12473, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    20. Martijn Leijten, 2013. "Real-world decision-making on mega-projects: politics, bias and strategic behaviour," Chapters, in: Hugo Priemus & Bert van Wee (ed.), International Handbook on Mega-Projects, chapter 4, pages 57-82, Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:20:p:11305-:d:655258. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.