IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i17p9702-d624913.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improvement of Container Terminal Productivity with Knowledge about Future Transport Modes: A Theoretical Agent-Based Modelling Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Mehdi Mazloumi

    (C-MAT, Center for Maritime and Air Transportation Management, Antwerp Management School, University of Antwerp, Boogkeers 5, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium)

  • Edwin van Hassel

    (Department of Transport and Regional Economics, University of Antwerp, Prinsstraat 13, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium)

Abstract

Despite all the achievements in improving container terminal performance in terms of equipment and container stacking systems (CSS), terminal operators are still facing several challenges. One of these challenges is the lack of information about further transportation modes of the container, which leads to extra movements of the container inside the stacking area. Hence, we aimed to examine factors that affect container handling processes and to evaluate a container terminal’s overall equipment effectiveness. This study used data from a container terminal at the Port of Antwerp, Belgium. An agent-based model was developed based on a block-stacking strategy to investigate two scenarios: (1) having information about further transportation modes and (2) a base scenario. The Overall Equipment Effectiveness Index (OEE) was also adopted to evaluate the container terminal’s effectiveness in both scenarios. Results showed that having information on further transportation mode significantly increased the container outflow, and the OEE index improved compared to the base scenario’s results. Therefore, we recommend an integrated data-sharing system where all the stakeholders can share their information with no fear of losing their market share.

Suggested Citation

  • Mehdi Mazloumi & Edwin van Hassel, 2021. "Improvement of Container Terminal Productivity with Knowledge about Future Transport Modes: A Theoretical Agent-Based Modelling Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-17, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:17:p:9702-:d:624913
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/17/9702/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/17/9702/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ioannidis, Evangelos & Varsakelis, Nikos & Antoniou, Ioannis, 2018. "Communication Policies in Knowledge Networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 492(C), pages 360-374.
    2. Pillac, Victor & Gendreau, Michel & Guéret, Christelle & Medaglia, Andrés L., 2013. "A review of dynamic vehicle routing problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 225(1), pages 1-11.
    3. Jasmine Lam & Wei Yap, 2006. "A measurement and Comparison of Cost Competitiveness of Container Ports in Southeast Asia," Transportation, Springer, vol. 33(6), pages 641-654, November.
    4. Nguyen, Son & Chen, Peggy Shu-Ling & Du, Yuquan & Thai, Vinh V., 2021. "An Operational Risk Analysis Model for Container Shipping Systems considering Uncertainty Quantification," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    5. Zeng, Fangli & Chan, Hing Kai & Pawar, Kulwant, 2021. "The effects of inter- and intraorganizational factors on the adoption of electronic booking systems in the maritime supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    6. Park, Jin Suk & Seo, Young-Joon & Ha, Min-Ho, 2019. "The role of maritime, land, and air transportation in economic growth: Panel evidence from OECD and non-OECD countries," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    7. López-Bermúdez, Beatriz & Freire-Seoane, María Jesús & González-Laxe, Fernando, 2019. "Efficiency and productivity of container terminals in Brazilian ports (2008–2017)," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 82-91.
    8. Peng, Peng & Yang, Yu & Lu, Feng & Cheng, Shifen & Mou, Naixia & Yang, Ren, 2018. "Modelling the competitiveness of the ports along the Maritime Silk Road with big data," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 852-867.
    9. Bernhofen, Daniel M. & El-Sahli, Zouheir & Kneller, Richard, 2016. "Estimating the effects of the container revolution on world trade," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 36-50.
    10. Peter Shobayo & Edwin van Hassel, 2019. "Container barge congestion and handling in large seaports: a theoretical agent-based modeling approach," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 1-26, December.
    11. Gumuskaya, Volkan & van Jaarsveld, Willem & Dijkman, Remco & Grefen, Paul & Veenstra, Albert, 2020. "Dynamic barge planning with stochastic container arrivals," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    12. Ioannidis, Evangelos & Varsakelis, Nikos & Antoniou, Ioannis, 2018. "Experts in Knowledge Networks: Central Positioning and Intelligent Selections," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 509(C), pages 890-905.
    13. Reis, Vasco, 2014. "Analysis of mode choice variables in short-distance intermodal freight transport using an agent-based model," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 100-120.
    14. Kress, Dominik & Meiswinkel, Sebastian & Pesch, Erwin, 2019. "Straddle carrier routing at seaport container terminals in the presence of short term quay crane buffer areas," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(3), pages 732-750.
    15. Chen, Lu & Lu, Zhiqiang, 2012. "The storage location assignment problem for outbound containers in a maritime terminal," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(1), pages 73-80.
    16. Martijn van der Horst & Michiel Kort & Bart Kuipers & Harry Geerlings, 2019. "Coordination problems in container barging in the port of Rotterdam: an institutional analysis," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(2), pages 187-199, February.
    17. Evangelos Mennis & Agapios Platis & Ioannis Lagoudis & Nikitas Nikitakos, 2008. "Improving Port Container Terminal Efficiency with the use of Markov Theory," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 10(3), pages 243-257, September.
    18. SteadieSeifi, M. & Dellaert, N.P. & Nuijten, W. & Van Woensel, T. & Raoufi, R., 2014. "Multimodal freight transportation planning: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(1), pages 1-15.
    19. Pandey, Sushil & Hardaker, J. Brian, 1995. "The role of modelling in the quest for sustainable farming systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 47(4), pages 439-450.
    20. Volkan Gumuskaya & Willem Jaarsveld & Remco Dijkman & Paul Grefen & Albert Veenstra, 2020. "A framework for modelling and analysing coordination challenges in hinterland transport systems," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 22(1), pages 124-145, March.
    21. Amir Gharehgozli & Nima Zaerpour & Rene Koster, 2020. "Container terminal layout design: transition and future," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 22(4), pages 610-639, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Huy Tung Pham & Luong Hai Nguyen, 2022. "Empirical Performance Measurement of Cargo Handling Equipment in Vietnam Container Terminals," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-18, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gumuskaya, Volkan & van Jaarsveld, Willem & Dijkman, Remco & Grefen, Paul & Veenstra, Albert, 2020. "Dynamic barge planning with stochastic container arrivals," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    2. Guo, Wenjing & Zhang, Yimeng & Li, Wenfeng & Negenborn, Rudy R. & Atasoy, Bilge, 2024. "Augmented Lagrangian relaxation-based coordinated approach for global synchromodal transport planning with multiple operators," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    3. Fan Bu & Heather Nachtmann, 2023. "Literature review and comparative analysis of inland waterways transport: “Container on Barge”," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 25(1), pages 140-173, March.
    4. Dimitris Tsintsaris & Milan Tsompanoglou & Evangelos Ioannidis, 2024. "Dynamics of Social Influence and Knowledge in Networks: Sociophysics Models and Applications in Social Trading, Behavioral Finance and Business," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-27, April.
    5. Raeesi, Ramin & Sahebjamnia, Navid & Mansouri, S. Afshin, 2023. "The synergistic effect of operational research and big data analytics in greening container terminal operations: A review and future directions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(3), pages 943-973.
    6. Ralf Elbert & Lowis Seikowsky, 2017. "The influences of behavioral biases, barriers and facilitators on the willingness of forwarders’ decision makers to modal shift from unimodal road freight transport to intermodal road–rail freight tra," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 87(8), pages 1083-1123, November.
    7. Evangelos Ioannidis & Nikos Varsakelis & Ioannis Antoniou, 2020. "Promoters versus Adversaries of Change: Agent-Based Modeling of Organizational Conflict in Co-Evolving Networks," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-25, December.
    8. Fazi, Stefano & Fransoo, Jan C. & Van Woensel, Tom & Dong, Jing-Xin, 2020. "A variant of the split vehicle routing problem with simultaneous deliveries and pickups for inland container shipping in dry-port based systems," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    9. C. Y. Lam, 2021. "Optimizing logistics routings in a network perspective of supply and demand nodes," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 29(1), pages 357-377, March.
    10. M. A. Mueller & B. Wiegmans & J. H. R. Duin, 2020. "The geography of container port choice: modelling the impact of hinterland changes on port choice," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 22(1), pages 26-52, March.
    11. Nektarios A. Michail & Konstantinos D. Melas & Dimitris Batzilis, 2021. "Container shipping trade and real GDP growth: A panel vector autoregressive approach," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 41(2), pages 304-315.
    12. Pérez Rivera, Arturo E. & Mes, Martijn R.K., 2017. "Anticipatory freight selection in intermodal long-haul round-trips," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 176-194.
    13. Evangelos Ioannidis & Nikos Varsakelis & Ioannis Antoniou, 2021. "Intelligent Agents in Co-Evolving Knowledge Networks," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-17, January.
    14. Martin Hrušovský & Emrah Demir & Werner Jammernegg & Tom Woensel, 2018. "Hybrid simulation and optimization approach for green intermodal transportation problem with travel time uncertainty," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 486-516, September.
    15. Aalok Kumar & Ramesh Anbanandam, 2020. "A Flexible Policy Framework for Analysing Multimodal Freight Transportation System in India: SAP–LAP and Efficient IRP Method," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 21(1), pages 35-52, March.
    16. Tufano, Alessandro & Zuidwijk, Rob & Van Dalen, Jan, 2023. "The development of data-driven logistic platforms for barge transportation network under incomplete data," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    17. Patricio Gallardo & Rua Murray & Susan Krumdieck, 2021. "A Sequential Optimization-Simulation Approach for Planning the Transition to the Low Carbon Freight System with Case Study in the North Island of New Zealand," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-24, June.
    18. Xiaoshi Zhou & Wanglin Ma, 2021. "Does agricultural mechanization reduce vulnerable employment? Evidence from cross-country panel data," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 41(2), pages 294-303.
    19. Reyes, Damián & Erera, Alan L. & Savelsbergh, Martin W.P., 2018. "Complexity of routing problems with release dates and deadlines," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(1), pages 29-34.
    20. Charlotte Emlinger & Viola Lamani, 2020. "International trade, quality sorting and trade costs: the case of Cognac," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 156(3), pages 579-609, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:17:p:9702-:d:624913. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.