IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i15p8556-d605935.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Defining a Successful Project in Sustainable Project Management through Simulation—A Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Jagoda Mrzygłocka-Chojnacka

    (Faculty of Computer Science and Management, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Wyb. Wyspiańskiego 27, 50-370 Wrocław, Poland)

  • Stanisław Stanek

    (Faculty of Management, General Tadeusz Kosciuszko Military Academy of Land Forces, Ul. Czajkowskiego 109, 51-147 Wrocław, Poland)

  • Dorota Kuchta

    (Faculty of Computer Science and Management, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Wyb. Wyspiańskiego 27, 50-370 Wrocław, Poland)

Abstract

Modern approaches to project management link project success both to sustainability and with the value delivered to project stakeholders. In the final analysis, it is the satisfaction of the identified stakeholders based on the sustainability principle which decides whether a project is successful or not. The value delivered to appropriate stakeholders has to be incorporated in the earliest phases of the project defining process. Otherwise, it may be too late to introduce changes which would allow the right value to be delivered to the right stakeholders. In this paper, we propose that a simulation is used in the phase of project definition to choose such implementation forms for individual project phases or tasks which would facilitate the delivery of the value expected by the stakeholders. Our approach also supports the process of agreeing (among the stakeholders) on the value expected from the project. We show, using a post-factum real-world project case, that the application of a simulation in the predictive project stage may considerably increase the probability of the project’s success.

Suggested Citation

  • Jagoda Mrzygłocka-Chojnacka & Stanisław Stanek & Dorota Kuchta, 2021. "Defining a Successful Project in Sustainable Project Management through Simulation—A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-23, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:15:p:8556-:d:605935
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/15/8556/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/15/8556/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Luz Stella Cardona-Meza & Gerard Olivar-Tost, 2017. "Modeling and Simulation of Project Management through the PMBOK® Standard Using Complex Networks," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-12, December.
    2. Kouskouras, Konstantinos G. & Georgiou, Andreas C., 2007. "A discrete event simulation model in the case of managing a software project," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 181(1), pages 374-389, August.
    3. Mahmoud Rajablu & Shabnam Hamdi & Govindan Marthandan & Wan Fadzilah Wan Yusoff, 2017. "Managing for stakeholders: introducing stakeholder metrics-integrated model to lead project ethics and success," International Journal of Project Organisation and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(1), pages 31-56.
    4. Dorota Kuchta & Stanisław Stanek, 2020. "Application of Simulation to Selecting Project Strategy for Autonomous Research Projects at Public Universities," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-23, March.
    5. Jay W. Forrester, 1968. "Industrial Dynamics--After the First Decade," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 14(7), pages 398-415, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dorota Kuchta & Stanisław Stanek, 2020. "Application of Simulation to Selecting Project Strategy for Autonomous Research Projects at Public Universities," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-23, March.
    2. Masechaba Nthunya & Nien-Tsu Tuan & Corrinne Shaw & Ian Jay, 2017. "A Systemic Exploration of Lesotho’s Basic Education through Interactive Management," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 257-276, June.
    3. Sahar AlMashaqbeh & Jose Eduardo Munive-Hernandez, 2023. "Risk Analysis under a Circular Economy Context Using a Systems Thinking Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-17, February.
    4. Luis Camilo Ortigueira-Sánchez, 2017. "Influencing factors on citizen safety perception: systems and broken windows theories," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 14(1), pages 95-111, March.
    5. David C. Lane, 2022. "Fons et origo: reflections on the 60th anniversary of Industrial Dynamics," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 38(3), pages 292-324, July.
    6. Dennis Gensch, 2001. "A Marketing-Decision-Support Model for Evaluating and Selecting Concepts for New Products," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 31(3_supplem), pages 166-183, June.
    7. Marzouk, Mohamed & Seleem, Noreihan, 2018. "Assessment of existing buildings performance using system dynamics technique," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 1308-1323.
    8. Leroudier, Jacques & Parent, Michel, 1979. "Discrete event simulation modelling of computer systems for performance evaluation," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 50-79.
    9. Ellen Mangnus & A.C.M. (Guus) Van Westen, 2018. "Roaming through the Maze of Maize in Northern Ghana. A Systems Approach to Explore the Long-Term Effects of a Food Security Intervention," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-19, October.
    10. Gogi, Anastasia & Tako, Antuela A. & Robinson, Stewart, 2016. "An experimental investigation into the role of simulation models in generating insights," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(3), pages 931-944.
    11. Camilo Olaya, 2015. "Cows, agency, and the significance of operational thinking," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 31(4), pages 183-219, October.
    12. Rammelt, Crelis F. & Leung, Maggi W.H., 2017. "Tracing the Causal Loops Through Local Perceptions of Rural Road Impacts in Ethiopia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 1-14.
    13. Carlos M. Chang & Johanes Makahaube & Adeeba A. Raheem & Eric Smith & Syeda Lamiya Mahnaz, 2022. "Using System Dynamics Method to Measure Project Management Performance of Local Government Agencies," Businesses, MDPI, vol. 2(4), pages 1-20, September.
    14. Vazquez, Miguel & Hallack, Michelle, 2018. "The role of regulatory learning in energy transition: The case of solar PV in Brazil," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 465-481.
    15. Lin, Junyi & Naim, Mohamed M. & Tang, Ou, 2024. "In-house or outsourcing? The impact of remanufacturing strategies on the dynamics of component remanufacturing systems under lifecycle demand and returns," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(3), pages 965-979.
    16. David C. Lane & Özge Pala & Yaman Barlas & David C. Lane & Özge Pala & Yaman Barlas, 2015. "Health, Demographic Change and Well-Being: The European Union's Horizon 2020 Programme and System Dynamics," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(4), pages 407-413, July.
    17. Kish, K. & Mallery, D. & Yahya Haage, G. & Melgar-Melgar, R. & Burke, M. & Orr, C. & Smolyar, N.L. & Sanniti, S. & Larson, J., 2021. "Fostering critical pluralism with systems theory, methods, and heuristics," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    18. Morgan, Jennifer Sian & Howick, Susan & Belton, Valerie, 2017. "A toolkit of designs for mixing Discrete Event Simulation and System Dynamics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(3), pages 907-918.
    19. Yujia Ge & Bin Xu, 2016. "Dynamic Staffing and Rescheduling in Software Project Management: A Hybrid Approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(6), pages 1-28, June.
    20. Zhang, Ruining & Ai, Xianneng & Li, Hui, 2023. "How to design subsidy policies for clean energy projects? A study on “coal-to-gas” project in China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PB).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:15:p:8556-:d:605935. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.