IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i14p7704-d591783.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Initial Positive Indications with Wearable Fitness Technology Followed by Relapse: What’s Going On?

Author

Listed:
  • James Parker

    (Center of Research on Welfare, Health and Sport, Halmstad University, 301 18 Halmstad, Sweden)

  • Urban Johnson

    (Center of Research on Welfare, Health and Sport, Halmstad University, 301 18 Halmstad, Sweden)

  • Andreas Ivarsson

    (Center of Research on Welfare, Health and Sport, Halmstad University, 301 18 Halmstad, Sweden)

Abstract

The motivational influence of wearable fitness technology (WFT) on increasing physical activity (PA) is unclear, and improvements in PA have been shown to be driven by both intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. In the current study, PA (daily number of steps), moderate to vigorous intensity physical activity, and muscular strength training were measured over 6 months on, originally, 16 randomly selected sedentary community workers (mean age = 51 years). Moreover, self-determined motivation (Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire-2) was measured before, midway, and after a 6-month intervention program that included motivational interviewing, as well as the use of WFT and a structured outdoor gym program. Our findings showed WFT, in combination with motivational interviewing, initially helped the participants meet recommended guidelines for PA in terms of at least 10,000 steps per day, and at least 150 min of moderate aerobic activity per week. There was a large decrease in participants’ PA and increase in introjected motivation between the first half (3 months) and the second half of the intervention (6 months). The increase in introjected motivation suggests that toward the end of the 6-month intervention, participants engaged in PA to satisfy external demands or avoid guilt, which may lead to less-persistent behavior change.

Suggested Citation

  • James Parker & Urban Johnson & Andreas Ivarsson, 2021. "Initial Positive Indications with Wearable Fitness Technology Followed by Relapse: What’s Going On?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-10, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:14:p:7704-:d:591783
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/14/7704/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/14/7704/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jordan Etkin, 2016. "The Hidden Cost of Personal Quantification," Journal of Consumer Research, Oxford University Press, vol. 42(6), pages 967-984.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vera Pedragosa & Salvador Angosto & Celina Gonçalves, 2022. "Validity and Reliability of a Wearable Fitness Technology Scale in Portugal," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-13, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Monica C. LaBarge & Kristen L. Walker & Courtney Nations Azzari & Maureen Bourassa & Jesse Catlin & Stacey Finkelstein & Alexei Gloukhovtsev & James Leonhardt & Kelly Martin & Maria Rejowicz‐Quaid & M, 2022. "Digital exchange compromises: Teetering priorities of consumers and organizations at the iron triangle," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(3), pages 1220-1243, September.
    2. Shiri Melumad & Rhonda Hadi & Christian Hildebrand & Adrian F. Ward, 2020. "Technology-Augmented Choice: How Digital Innovations Are Transforming Consumer Decision Processes," Customer Needs and Solutions, Springer;Institute for Sustainable Innovation and Growth (iSIG), vol. 7(3), pages 90-101, October.
    3. Wang, Xia & Ding, Ying, 2022. "The impact of monetary rewards on product sales in referral programs: The role of product image aesthetics," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 828-842.
    4. Volkmar, Gioia & Fischer, Peter M. & Reinecke, Sven, 2022. "Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning: Exploring drivers, barriers, and future developments in marketing management," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 599-614.
    5. Ulph, Alistair & Panzone, Luca & Hilton, Denis, 2023. "Do rational people sometimes act irrationally? A dynamic self-regulation model of sustainable consumer behavior," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    6. Roshni Raveendhran & Nathanael J. Fast, 2024. "When and why consumers prefer human-free behavior tracking products," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 35(3), pages 395-408, September.
    7. Fleura Bardhi & Giana M. Eckhardt, 2017. "Liquid Consumption," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 44(3), pages 582-597.
    8. Lane Peterson Fronczek & Martin Mende & Maura L. Scott & Gergana Y. Nenkov & Anders Gustafsson, 2023. "Friend or foe? Can anthropomorphizing self-tracking devices backfire on marketers and consumers?," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(5), pages 1075-1097, September.
    9. Yudong Zhang & Huilong Zhang & Chubing Zhang & Dongjin Li, 2020. "The Impact of Self-Quantification on Consumers’ Participation in Green Consumption Activities and Behavioral Decision-Making," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-21, May.
    10. Lane Peterson Fronczek & Martin Mende & Maura L. Scott, 2022. "From self‐quantification to self‐objectification? Framework and research agenda on consequences for well‐being," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(3), pages 1356-1374, September.
    11. Yang (Alison) Liu & Zhenhui (Jack) Jiang & Ben C. F. Choi, 2023. "Pushing Yourself Harder: The Effects of Mobile Touch Modes on Users’ Self-Regulation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(3), pages 996-1016, September.
    12. Lieberman, Alicea & Amir, On & Carmon, Ziv, 2023. "The entrenchment effect: Why people persist with less-preferred behaviors," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    13. Sylvie Crouzet, 2022. "Train your buyers in the hidden cost method! For a purchasing cost that incorporates evaluation of the impact of purchasing-related dysfunctions [Formez vos acheteurs à la méthode des coûts-perform," Post-Print hal-04223281, HAL.
    14. Wolf, Tobias & Jahn, Steffen & Hammerschmidt, Maik & Weiger, Welf H., 2021. "Competition versus cooperation: How technology-facilitated social interdependence initiates the self-improvement chain," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 472-491.
    15. Riedel, Nadine & Stüber, Robert, 2019. "Overearning – Revisited," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 75(PA).
    16. Prentice, Catherine & Loureiro, Sandra Maria Correia, 2018. "Consumer-based approach to customer engagement – The case of luxury brands," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 325-332.
    17. Vandenbroele, Jolien & Van Kerckhove, Anneleen & Geuens, Maggie, 2020. "If you work it, flaunt it: Conspicuous displays of exercise efforts increase mate value," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 586-598.
    18. Yu-dong Zhang & Hui-long Zhang & Jia-qin Xie & Chu-bing Zhang, 2023. "The influence of self-quantification on individual’s participation performance and behavioral decision-making in physical fitness activities," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-11, December.
    19. De Keyser, Arne & Bart, Yakov & Gu, Xian & Liu, Stephanie Q. & Robinson, Stacey G. & Kannan, P.K., 2021. "Opportunities and challenges of using biometrics for business: Developing a research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 52-62.
    20. Linda Hagen & Kosuke Uetake & Nathan Yang & Bryan Bollinger & Allison J. B. Chaney & Daria Dzyabura & Jordan Etkin & Avi Goldfarb & Liu Liu & K. Sudhir & Yanwen Wang & James R. Wright & Ying Zhu, 2020. "How can machine learning aid behavioral marketing research?," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 31(4), pages 361-370, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:14:p:7704-:d:591783. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.