IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/elmark/v34y2024i1d10.1007_s12525-024-00739-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Recommending AI based on Quantified Self: Investigating the mechanism of consumer acceptance of AI recommendations

Author

Listed:
  • Aoxue Li

    (Hefei University of Technology)

  • Zhengping Ding

    (Hefei University of Technology
    Key Laboratory of Philosophy and Social Sciences for Cyberspace Behaviour and Management)

  • Chunhua Sun

    (Hefei University of Technology
    Key Laboratory of Philosophy and Social Sciences for Cyberspace Behaviour and Management)

  • Yezheng Liu

    (Hefei University of Technology
    Key Laboratory of Process Optimization and Intelligent Decision-Making, Ministry of Education)

Abstract

Rapid advancement and widespread use of Quantified Self technology have contributed to the development of artificial intelligence (AI) recommendations. This study is aimed at exploring how users’ perception of the technology affordance of Quantified Self is associated with their intention to accept AI-recommended products. We distinguish four key technology affordances (information richness, personalization, visibility, and metavoicing) of the Quantified Self platform on affordance theory and explore their impact on consumer responses. A one-group design experiment with a pretest was conducted, and 360 participants were recruited to participate in the experiment and fill in the questionnaires. Finally, 344 valid questionnaires were obtained. The findings indicate the following: (1) information richness, personalization, visibility, and metavoicing positively impact purchase intention through trust and behavioral control. (2) Appearance concern positively moderated the relationships between metavoicing and trust and between metavoicing and behavioral control and negatively moderated the relationships between information richness and behavioral control and between personalization and behavioral control. Hence, this study has theoretical significance and practical implications for enriching the knowledge on how to introduce Quantified Self to improve the conversion rate of AI recommendations.

Suggested Citation

  • Aoxue Li & Zhengping Ding & Chunhua Sun & Yezheng Liu, 2024. "Recommending AI based on Quantified Self: Investigating the mechanism of consumer acceptance of AI recommendations," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 34(1), pages 1-15, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:elmark:v:34:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s12525-024-00739-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s12525-024-00739-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12525-024-00739-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12525-024-00739-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Quantified Self; Technology affordance; Trust; Behavioral control; Purchase intention; Appearance concern;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M2 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:elmark:v:34:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s12525-024-00739-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.