IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i13p7118-d581742.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Knowledge Management and Sustainable Balanced Scorecard: Practical Application to a Service SME

Author

Listed:
  • Diego G. Ferber Pineyrua

    (Curso de Engenharia de Produção—CPTL, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Três Lagoas 79602-070, Brazil)

  • Alfonso Redondo

    (Departamento de Organización de Empresas y Comercialización e Investigación de Mercado, Universidad de Valladolid, 47011 Valladolid, Spain)

  • José A. Pascual

    (Departamento de Organización de Empresas y Comercialización e Investigación de Mercado, Universidad de Valladolid, 47011 Valladolid, Spain)

  • Ángel M. Gento

    (Departamento de Organización de Empresas y Comercialización e Investigación de Mercado, Universidad de Valladolid, 47011 Valladolid, Spain)

Abstract

Many works highlight the importance and added value of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in companies, as well as the role of Knowledge Management (KM) for their revitalization, but even more important is to ensure that all efforts and resources are aligned with the organization’s strategic objectives (Balanced Scorecard, BSC). The aim of this work is to integrate BSC, CSR and KM based on the results of two previous researches: one on BSC–CSR and the other on KM, both of a projective nature (description-action-contrast). The research carried out has made it possible to identify 45 KM indicators, 102 CSR indicators and their corresponding correlations with the strategic objectives and perspectives of the BSC. In addition, an Excel tool was designed and developed for SMEs that is customizable, intuitive and useful for decision-making, which allowed us to contrast the obtained results.

Suggested Citation

  • Diego G. Ferber Pineyrua & Alfonso Redondo & José A. Pascual & Ángel M. Gento, 2021. "Knowledge Management and Sustainable Balanced Scorecard: Practical Application to a Service SME," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-24, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:13:p:7118-:d:581742
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/13/7118/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/13/7118/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Enrique Moral-Benito, 2018. "Growing by learning: firm-level evidence on the size-productivity nexus," SERIEs: Journal of the Spanish Economic Association, Springer;Spanish Economic Association, vol. 9(1), pages 65-90, March.
    2. César Álvarez Pérez & Vicente Rodríguez Montequín & Francisco Ortega Fernández & Joaquín Villanueva Balsera, 2017. "Integration of Balanced Scorecard (BSC), Strategy Map, and Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) for a Sustainability Business Framework: A Case Study of a Spanish Software Factory in the Financial ," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-23, March.
    3. Hiroki Iwamoto & Hideo Suzuki, 2019. "An empirical study on the relationship of corporate financial performance and human capital concerning corporate social responsibility: Applying SEM and Bayesian SEM," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 1656443-165, January.
    4. Nicholas John Wake, 2015. "The use of the balanced scorecard to measure knowledge work," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 64(4), pages 590-602, April.
    5. Ivo Hristov & Antonio Chirico & Andrea Appolloni, 2019. "Sustainability Value Creation, Survival, and Growth of the Company: A Critical Perspective in the Sustainability Balanced Scorecard (SBSC)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-19, April.
    6. Iacob Catoiu & Liviu Tudor & Cristian Bisa, 2016. "Knowledge-Intensive Business Services and Business Consulting Services in Romanian Changing Economic Environment," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 18(41), pages 1-40, February.
    7. Fawad Latif & Andrea Pérez & Waqar Alam & Adeel Saqib, 2018. "Development and validation of a multi-dimensional customer-based scale to measure perceptions of corporate social responsibility (CSR)," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 15(4), pages 492-512, November.
    8. Veronika Bumberová & František Milichovský, 2019. "Sustainability Development of Knowledge-Intensive Business Services: Strategic Actions and Business Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-19, September.
    9. Jenny Doorn & Marjolijn Onrust & Peter C. Verhoef & Marnix S. Bügel, 2017. "The impact of corporate social responsibility on customer attitudes and retention—the moderating role of brand success indicators," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 607-619, December.
    10. Magdalena Öberseder & Bodo Schlegelmilch & Patrick Murphy & Verena Gruber, 2014. "Consumers’ Perceptions of Corporate Social Responsibility: Scale Development and Validation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 124(1), pages 101-115, September.
    11. Frank Figge & Tobias Hahn & Stefan Schaltegger & Marcus Wagner, 2002. "The Sustainability Balanced Scorecard – linking sustainability management to business strategy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(5), pages 269-284, September.
    12. Erik G. Hansen & Stefan Schaltegger, 2016. "The Sustainability Balanced Scorecard: A Systematic Review of Architectures," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 133(2), pages 193-221, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maria José Gomes & António Sousa & Jorge Novas & Ricardo Vinícius Dias Jordão, 2021. "Environmental Sustainability in Viticulture as a Balanced Scorecard Perspective of the Wine Industry: Evidence for the Portuguese Region of Alentejo," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-18, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ivo Hristov & Antonio Chirico & Andrea Appolloni, 2019. "Sustainability Value Creation, Survival, and Growth of the Company: A Critical Perspective in the Sustainability Balanced Scorecard (SBSC)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-19, April.
    2. Ivo Hristov & Antonio Chirico, 2019. "The Role of Sustainability Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) in Implementing Sustainable Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-19, October.
    3. Rolf Uwe Fülbier & Thorsten Sellhorn, 2023. "Understanding and improving the language of business: How accounting and corporate reporting research can better serve business and society," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 93(6), pages 1089-1124, August.
    4. Jassem Suaad & Zakaria Zarina & Che Azmi Anna, 2020. "Sustainability Balanced Scorecard Architecture and Environmental Investment Decision-Making," Foundations of Management, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 193-210, January.
    5. Samara da Silva Neiva & Ramaswamy Arun Prasath & Wellyngton Silva de Amorim & Mauricio de Andrade Lima & Samuel Borges Barbosa & João Marcelo Pereira Ribeiro & Flávio Ceci & Jonas Schneider & André Bo, 2021. "Sustainable urban development: Can the balanced scorecard contribute to the strategic management of sustainable cities?," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(6), pages 1155-1172, November.
    6. Jitender Kumar & Neha Prince & H. Kent Baker, 2022. "Balanced Scorecard: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Issues," FIIB Business Review, , vol. 11(2), pages 147-161, June.
    7. Radu Godina & Inês Ribeiro & Florinda Matos & Bruna T. Ferreira & Helena Carvalho & Paulo Peças, 2020. "Impact Assessment of Additive Manufacturing on Sustainable Business Models in Industry 4.0 Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-21, August.
    8. José Baltazar Salgueirinho Osório de Andrade Guerra & Jonas Schneider & Mauricio Andrade De Lima & Maria Gabriela M. Peixoto & Samuel Borges Barbosa & Samara da Silva Neiva & Robert Birch & Marco Anto, 2023. "Balanced scorecard and eco‐innovation in the industrial sector: A strategic map for environmental innovation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(7), pages 4266-4281, November.
    9. Nicolas G. A. Lorgnier & Che-Jen Su & Shawn M. O’Rourke, 2022. "Brands’ perceived sustainable development goals: index development and applications with professional sport teams and fast-food brands," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 16(1), pages 125-157, March.
    10. Maria José Gomes & António Sousa & Jorge Novas & Ricardo Vinícius Dias Jordão, 2021. "Environmental Sustainability in Viticulture as a Balanced Scorecard Perspective of the Wine Industry: Evidence for the Portuguese Region of Alentejo," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-18, September.
    11. Binh Bui & Muhammad Nurul Houqe & Muhammad Kaleem Zahir-ul-Hassan, 2022. "Moderating effect of carbon accounting systems on strategy and carbon performance: a CDP analysis," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 33(4), pages 483-524, December.
    12. Muhammad Rafiq & Saif Maqbool & José Moleiro Martins & Mário Nuno Mata & Rui Miguel Dantas & Shumaila Naz & Anabela Batista Correia, 2021. "A Study on Balanced Scorecard and Its Impact on Sustainable Development of Renewable Energy Organizations; A Mediating Role of Political and Regulatory Institutions," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-18, June.
    13. Fridolin Simon Brand & Richard Blaese & Giulia Weber & Herbert Winistoerfer, 2022. "Changes in Corporate Responsibility Management during COVID-19 Crisis and Their Effects on Business Resilience: An Empirical Study of Swiss and German Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-18, March.
    14. Laura Illia & Elena Alberti & Grazia Murtarelli & Elanor Colleoni, 2022. "Being best in the world or best for the world? Fostering CSR cooperative behaviors through communication," Italian Journal of Marketing, Springer, vol. 2022(2), pages 173-202, June.
    15. Beata Zyznarska-Dworczak, 2020. "Sustainability Accounting—Cognitive and Conceptual Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-24, November.
    16. Chiara Mio & Antonio Costantini & Silvia Panfilo, 2022. "Performance measurement tools for sustainable business: A systematic literature review on the sustainability balanced scorecard use," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(2), pages 367-384, March.
    17. Ivo Hristov & Antonio Chirico, 2023. "The cultural dimension as a key value driver of the sustainable development at a strategic level: an integrated five-dimensional approach," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(7), pages 7011-7028, July.
    18. Erik G. Hansen & Stefan Schaltegger, 2018. "Sustainability Balanced Scorecards and their Architectures: Irrelevant or Misunderstood?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(4), pages 937-952, July.
    19. Antonio Martos-Pedrero & David Jiménez-Castillo & Francisco Joaquín Cortés-García, 2022. "Examining drivers and outcomes of corporate social responsibility in agri-food firms," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 68(3), pages 79-86.
    20. Luger, Michaela & Hofer, Katharina Maria & Floh, Arne, 2022. "Support for corporate social responsibility among generation Y consumers in advanced versus emerging markets," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(2).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:13:p:7118-:d:581742. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.