IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/ijppmp/v64y2015i4p590-602.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The use of the balanced scorecard to measure knowledge work

Author

Listed:
  • Nicholas John Wake

Abstract

Purpose - – The purpose of this paper is to question whether the balanced scorecard provides an appropriate control mechanism for management control of knowledge workers. Design/methodology/approach - – A case study approach is taken to explore the way in which management control of employees engaged in research and development is undertaken. Findings - – The key finding of this work is that the balanced scorecard is not in itself a useful approach to management control of knowledge workers but provides an important mechanism for ensuring that there is alignment between the strategic objectives of an organisation and the work being undertaken. Research limitations/implications - – The inductive approach taken in a single-company case study has provided a rich data set for exploratory research, however, this research design limits the generalisability of the findings. Practical implications - – The work provides insights into how the balanced scorecard can be used in knowledge-worker environments. Originality/value - – The balanced scorecard is often reported as a tool that allows organisations to cascade strategic priorities down to the level of the individual though the use of measures. This research provides an alternative explanation of how the balanced scorecard can support knowledge worker control.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicholas John Wake, 2015. "The use of the balanced scorecard to measure knowledge work," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 64(4), pages 590-602, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:ijppmp:v:64:y:2015:i:4:p:590-602
    DOI: 10.1108/IJPPM-08-2012-0091
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJPPM-08-2012-0091/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJPPM-08-2012-0091/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/IJPPM-08-2012-0091?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nissen, Mark E., 2019. "Initiating a system for visualizing and measuring dynamic knowledge," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 169-181.
    2. Diego G. Ferber Pineyrua & Alfonso Redondo & José A. Pascual & Ángel M. Gento, 2021. "Knowledge Management and Sustainable Balanced Scorecard: Practical Application to a Service SME," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-24, June.
    3. repec:aly:journl:202201 is not listed on IDEAS

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:ijppmp:v:64:y:2015:i:4:p:590-602. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.