IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i11p6253-d567122.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Nexus between Proactive Eco-Innovation and Firm Financial Performance: A Circular Economy Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Satirenjit Kaur Johl

    (Department of Management and Humanities, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Seri Iskandar 32610, Malaysia)

  • Md Abu Toha

    (Department of Management and Humanities, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Seri Iskandar 32610, Malaysia
    Business Studies Group, Department of Accounting, National University, Gazipur 1704, Bangladesh)

Abstract

Eco-innovation has gained considerable attention in the academic and corporate world due to its potential in mitigating a firm’s sustainability issues. Most previous studies focused on the reactive approaches of eco-innovation using primary data. This study mitigates the existing research gap by highlighting proactive eco-innovation and using a secondary panel dataset. The prime objective of this study is to investigate the relationship between proactive eco-innovation and firms’ financial performance. Hence, the study will introduce the proactive eco-innovation index with the help of secondary panel data. In addition to that, the paper will also explore how proactive eco-innovation relates to circular economy. The theory of Resource-Based View (RBV) was used to explain the relationship among the variables. This study was conducted on 31 Malaysian public listed energy companies from 2015 to 2019. A proactive eco-innovation index was inferred by adapting three dimensions of eco-innovation (product, process, and technology) which is applicable for the energy sector. By applying random-effects GLS regression equation modeling, it was found that proactive eco-innovation (product eco-innovation, process eco-innovation, and technology eco-innovation) has a direct effect on firm financial performance. Furthermore, product and process eco-innovation is directly related to a circular economy through a sustainable product development process. The findings suggest that policymakers in the firm should proactively adopt eco-innovative practices. It will positively affect the circular economy as it will be cost-effective and help to reduce potential industrial pollution in the environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Satirenjit Kaur Johl & Md Abu Toha, 2021. "The Nexus between Proactive Eco-Innovation and Firm Financial Performance: A Circular Economy Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-25, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:11:p:6253-:d:567122
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/6253/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/6253/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Parvez Alam Khan & Satirenjit Kaur Johl, 2019. "Nexus of Comprehensive Green Innovation, Environmental Management System-14001-2015 and Firm Performance," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 1691833-169, January.
    2. Hausman, Jerry, 2015. "Specification tests in econometrics," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 38(2), pages 112-134.
    3. Adam Ryszko, 2016. "Proactive Environmental Strategy, Technological Eco-Innovation and Firm Performance—Case of Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-20, February.
    4. María Rodríguez-García & María Guijarro-García & Agustín Carrilero-Castillo, 2019. "An Overview of Ecopreneurship, Eco-Innovation, and the Ecological Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-16, May.
    5. David Ferreira Lopes Santos & Melissa Machado De Lima & Leonardo Fernando Cruz Basso & Herbert Kimura & Vinicius Amorim Sobreiro, 2017. "Eco-innovation and financial performance at companies established in Brazil," International Journal of Business and Emerging Markets, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(1), pages 68-89.
    6. Ayça Kubra Hizarci‐Payne & İlayda İpek & Gülüzar Kurt Gümüş, 2021. "How environmental innovation influences firm performance: A meta‐analytic review," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 1174-1190, February.
    7. Maria Chiarvesio & Valentina De Marchi & Eleonora Di Maria, 2015. "Environmental Innovations and Internationalization: Theory and Practices," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(8), pages 790-801, December.
    8. Francesca Mazzoni, 2020. "Circular economy and eco-innovation in Italian industrial clusters. Best practices from Prato textile cluster," Post-Print hal-03271849, HAL.
    9. Russell Tatenda Munodawafa & Satirenjit Kaur Johl, 2019. "A Systematic Review of Eco-Innovation and Performance from the Resource-Based and Stakeholder Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-23, November.
    10. Justyna Przychodzen & Wojciech Przychodzen, 2013. "Corporate sustainability and shareholder wealth," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(4), pages 474-493, May.
    11. Durán-Romero, Gemma & López, Ana M. & Beliaeva, Tatiana & Ferasso, Marcos & Garonne, Christophe & Jones, Paul, 2020. "Bridging the gap between circular economy and climate change mitigation policies through eco-innovations and Quintuple Helix Model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    12. Yi‐Chuan Liao & Kuen‐Hung Tsai, 2019. "Innovation intensity, creativity enhancement, and eco‐innovation strategy: The roles of customer demand and environmental regulation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(2), pages 316-326, February.
    13. Francesca Mazzoni, 2020. "Circular economy and eco-innovation in Italian industrial clusters. Best practices from Prato textile cluster," Insights into Regional Development, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 2(3), pages 661-676, September.
    14. Shyaam Ramkumar, 2020. "Influence of Inter-Firm Network Relationships on Circular Economy Eco-Innovation Adoption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-22, September.
    15. Rao Faizan Ali & P.D.D. Dominic & Kashif Ali, 2020. "Organizational Governance, Social Bonds and Information Security Policy Compliance: A Perspective towards Oil and Gas Employees," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-27, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Parvez Alam Khan & Satirenjit Kaur Johl & Shakeb Akhtar, 2021. "Firm Sustainable Development Goals and Firm Financial Performance through the Lens of Green Innovation Practices and Reporting: A Proactive Approach," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-23, December.
    2. Md. Imran Hossain & Md. Al-Amin & Md Abu Toha, 2021. "Are Commercial Agent Banking Services Worthwhile For Financial Inclusion?," Business Management and Strategy, Macrothink Institute, vol. 12(2), pages 206-227, December.
    3. Lingli Qing & Dongphil Chun & Abd Alwahed Dagestani & Peng Li, 2022. "Does Proactive Green Technology Innovation Improve Financial Performance? Evidence from Listed Companies with Semiconductor Concepts Stock in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-20, April.
    4. Ahmad Ali Jan & Fong-Woon Lai & Muhammad Umar Draz & Muhammad Tahir & Syed Emad Azhar Ali & Muhammad Zahid & Muhammad Kashif Shad, 2022. "Integrating sustainability practices into islamic corporate governance for sustainable firm performance: from the lens of agency and stakeholder theories," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(5), pages 2989-3012, October.
    5. Fabio De Felice & Antonella Petrillo, 2021. "Green Transition: The Frontier of the Digicircular Economy Evidenced from a Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-26, October.
    6. Qinghua Fu & Muhammad Safdar Sial & Muhammad Zulqarnain Arshad & Ubaldo Comite & Phung Anh Thu & József Popp, 2021. "The Inter-Relationship between Innovation Capability and SME Performance: The Moderating Role of the External Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-14, August.
    7. Holger Raúl Barriga Medina & Ruben Guevara & Ronald Enrique Campoverde & Milton Ismael Paredes-Aguirre, 2022. "Eco-Innovation and Firm Performance: Evidence from South America," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-14, August.
    8. Pruethsan Sutthichaimethee & Chanintorn Jittawiriyanukoon, 2022. "The Impact of Causal Factors Relationship over the Changes in Future Scenario Management under the Sustainability Policy of Thailand," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 12(5), pages 36-46, September.
    9. Arilla-Llorente, Ramon & Gavurova, Beata & Rigelsky, Martin & Ribeiro-Soriano, Domingo, 2024. "Quantifying the dynamics of relationships between eco-innovations and SDG 8," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marco-Lajara, B. & Úbeda-García, M. & Zaragoza-Sáez, P. & Manresa-Marhuenda, E., 2023. "The impact of international experience on firm economic performance. The double mediating effect of green knowledge acquisition & eco-innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    2. Paulius Šūmakaris & Deniss Ščeulovs & Renata Korsakienė, 2020. "Current Research Trends on Interrelationships of Eco-Innovation and Internationalisation: A Bibliometric Analysis," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-16, April.
    3. Seungyeon Moon & Heesang Lee, 2021. "Shaping a Circular Economy in the Digital TV Industry: Focusing on Ecopreneurship through the Lens of Dynamic Capability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-41, April.
    4. Bressanelli, Gianmarco & Visintin, Filippo & Saccani, Nicola, 2022. "Circular Economy and the evolution of industrial districts: a supply chain perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    5. Han, Myat Su & Chen, Weiming, 2021. "Determinants of eco-innovation adoption of small and medium enterprises: An empirical analysis in Myanmar," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    6. Fabio De Felice & Antonella Petrillo, 2021. "Green Transition: The Frontier of the Digicircular Economy Evidenced from a Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-26, October.
    7. Md Abu Toha & Satirenjit Kaur Johl, 2021. "Panel Dataset to Assess Proactive Eco-Innovation in the Paradigm of Firm Financial Progression," Data, MDPI, vol. 6(12), pages 1-10, December.
    8. Tariq, Adeel & Badir, Yuosre F. & Tariq, Waqas & Bhutta, Umair Saeed, 2017. "Drivers and consequences of green product and process innovation: A systematic review, conceptual framework, and future outlook," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 8-23.
    9. Eduardo Duque‐Grisales & Javier Aguilera‐Caracuel & Jaime Guerrero‐Villegas & Encarnación García‐Sánchez, 2020. "Does green innovation affect the financial performance of Multilatinas? The moderating role of ISO 14001 and R&D investment," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3286-3302, December.
    10. Paulius Šūmakaris & Kristina Kovaitė & Renata Korsakienė, 2023. "An Integrated Approach to Evaluating Eco-Innovation Strategies from the Perspective of Strategic Green Transformation: A Case of the Lithuanian Furniture Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-33, June.
    11. Mergul Chemirbayeva & Zhanat Malgarayeva & Almagul Azamatova, 2020. "Economic strategy of diversification of enterprise activities under conditions of globalization," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 8(2), pages 1083-1102, December.
    12. Nomeda Dobrovolskienė & Anastasija Pozniak & Manuela Tvaronavičienė, 2021. "Assessment of the Sustainability of a Real Estate Project Using Multi-Criteria Decision Making," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-19, April.
    13. Joanna Kuczewska & Tomasz Tomaszewski, 2022. "Exploring potential drivers of innovation-related activities in Poland: evidence from Polish business clusters," Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 17(3), pages 775-801, September.
    14. Melek Yurdakul & Halim Kazan, 2020. "Effects of Eco-Innovation on Economic and Environmental Performance: Evidence from Turkey’s Manufacturing Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-22, April.
    15. Adam P. Balcerzak & Radka MacGregor Pelikánová, 2020. "Projection of SDGs in Codes of Ethics—Case Study about Lost in Translation," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-18, November.
    16. Bag, Surajit & Dhamija, Pavitra & Bryde, David J. & Singh, Rajesh Kumar, 2022. "Effect of eco-innovation on green supply chain management, circular economy capability, and performance of small and medium enterprises," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 60-72.
    17. Ane-Mari Androniceanu & Raluca Dana Căplescu & Manuela Tvaronavičienė & Cosmin Dobrin, 2021. "The Interdependencies between Economic Growth, Energy Consumption and Pollution in Europe," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-23, April.
    18. Hafizah Abd-Mutalib & Che Zuriana Muhammad Jamil & Rapiah Mohamed & Nor Atikah Shafai & Saidatul Nurul Hidayah Jannatun Naim Nor-Ahmad, 2021. "Firm and Board Characteristics, and E-Waste Disclosure: A Study in the Era of Digitalisation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-14, September.
    19. Meqbel Mishary Aliedan, 2020. "Overall business climate and its impact on environmental sustainability: analyzing evidence from ASEAN countries," Post-Print hal-03121009, HAL.
    20. Yahui Li & Wenli Zheng & Yunhui Zhao, 2022. "How Does Green Search Promote Green Innovation? The Mediating Role of Green Control," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-26, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:11:p:6253-:d:567122. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.