IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/oabmxx/v6y2019i1p1691833.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nexus of Comprehensive Green Innovation, Environmental Management System-14001-2015 and Firm Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Parvez Alam Khan
  • Satirenjit Kaur Johl

Abstract

The massive influx of global warming, pollution, natural resource depletion, waste, wastewater, climate change, and loss of biodiversity are the primary sources of motivating firms to innovate within their businesses. This has caused great concern for academicians, policymakers and practitioners to find solutions in dealing with the environmental issues. To provide the answer to the exiting challenges this study propounds the conceptual framework that explores the intervention of the new amendment in environment management system (14001–2015) towards innovation, comprehensive green innovation, and firm performance. Therefore, the main objective of this study is to find out the role and effect of ISO14001-(2015) on general innovation and comprehensive green innovation. This study combined the institutional theory, (environmental management system) resource-based theory (general innovation, comprehensive green innovation) and stakeholder theory (firm performance) to maximise the resources utilisation though newly amended EMS14001-2015 to meet the stakeholders demands without compromising the ecological standards. The proposed conceptual framework will provide a holistic view of the firm in formulating strategies and implementing a comprehensive green innovation to the industry. Implementation of a comprehensive green innovation will enable businesses to reduce the cost of production and end life cycle impact of the product, process, service and organisational innovation on the environment. By considering the end life cycle of innovation, including minimisation of the resource consumption, waste, waste to water and emission which will create a sustainable competitive advantage for the firm. All in all, this study propounds the conceptual framework of a comparative study between nomal innovation, comprehensive green innovation and organisation performance with the moderation of environmental management system (14001–2015).

Suggested Citation

  • Parvez Alam Khan & Satirenjit Kaur Johl, 2019. "Nexus of Comprehensive Green Innovation, Environmental Management System-14001-2015 and Firm Performance," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 1691833-169, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:6:y:2019:i:1:p:1691833
    DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2019.1691833
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23311975.2019.1691833
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23311975.2019.1691833?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiang Ji & Shiqi Zhang & Yuan Lu, 2023. "Does an Environmental Management System Affect Green Inno-Vation: The Role of Green Financing in China’s Tourism Sector in a Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-10, April.
    2. Tingting Li & Dan Zhao & Guiyun Liu & Yuhong Wang, 2022. "How to Evaluate College Students’ Green Innovation Ability—A Method Combining BWM and Modified Fuzzy TOPSIS," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-17, August.
    3. Mingyue Chu & Haslinah Binti Muhamad & Mazlina Binti Mustapha & Ong Tze San & Fangfang Zan & Xiaoxiao Jia, 2022. "Research Trends in Corporate Social Responsibility and Innovation: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, October.
    4. Muddassar Sarfraz & Larisa Ivascu & Muhammad Ibrahim Abdullah & Ilknur Ozturk & Jasim Tariq, 2022. "Exploring a Pathway to Sustainable Performance in Manufacturing Firms: The Interplay between Innovation Capabilities, Green Process, Product Innovations and Digital Leadership," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-19, May.
    5. Parvez Alam Khan & Satirenjit Kaur Johl & Shireenjit K. Johl, 2021. "Does adoption of ISO 56002‐2019 and green innovation reporting enhance the firm sustainable development goal performance? An emerging paradigm," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(7), pages 2922-2936, November.
    6. Parvez Alam Khan & Satirenjit Kaur Johl & Shakeb Akhtar, 2021. "Firm Sustainable Development Goals and Firm Financial Performance through the Lens of Green Innovation Practices and Reporting: A Proactive Approach," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-23, December.
    7. Ahmad Ali Jan & Fong-Woon Lai & Muhammad Umar Draz & Muhammad Tahir & Syed Emad Azhar Ali & Muhammad Zahid & Muhammad Kashif Shad, 2022. "Integrating sustainability practices into islamic corporate governance for sustainable firm performance: from the lens of agency and stakeholder theories," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(5), pages 2989-3012, October.
    8. Parvez Alam Khan & Satirenjit Kaur Johl & Shakeb Akhtar, 2022. "Vinculum of Sustainable Development Goal Practices and Firms’ Financial Performance: A Moderation Role of Green Innovation," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-24, February.
    9. Amjad Ali & Wajid Alim & Jawad Ahmed & Sabahat Nisar, 2022. "Yoke of corporate governance and firm performance: A study of listed firms in Pakistan," Indian Journal of Commerce and Management Studies, Educational Research Multimedia & Publications,India, vol. 13(1), pages 08-17, January.
    10. Ali Saleh Alshebami, 2023. "Green Innovation, Self-Efficacy, Entrepreneurial Orientation and Economic Performance: Interactions among Saudi Small Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, January.
    11. Stefano Brogi & Tamara Menichini, 2024. "The pathway towards circular economy: Measuring circular advantage of eco‐innovations," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 3005-3038, May.
    12. Eduardo Duque‐Grisales & Javier Aguilera‐Caracuel & Jaime Guerrero‐Villegas & Encarnación García‐Sánchez, 2020. "Does green innovation affect the financial performance of Multilatinas? The moderating role of ISO 14001 and R&D investment," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3286-3302, December.
    13. Junaid Aftab & Nabila Abid & Huma Sarwar & Anam Amin & Mahsa Abedini & Monica Veneziani, 2024. "Does corporate social responsibility drive financial performance? Exploring the significance of green innovation, green dynamic capabilities, and perceived environmental volatility," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(3), pages 1634-1653, May.
    14. Satirenjit Kaur Johl & Md Abu Toha, 2021. "The Nexus between Proactive Eco-Innovation and Firm Financial Performance: A Circular Economy Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-25, June.
    15. Wei, Xuecheng & Hu, Weihua, 2023. "Revisiting resources curse hypothesis in China: Exploring the asymmetric effect of green investment and green innovation," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PB).
    16. Xin, Yongrong & Long, Dengjie, 2023. "Linking eco-label knowledge and sustainable consumption of renewable energy: A roadmap towards green revolution," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 531-538.
    17. Syed Quaid Ali Shah & Fong-Woon Lai & Muhammad Kashif Shad & Ahmad Ali Jan, 2022. "Developing a Green Governance Framework for the Performance Enhancement of the Oil and Gas Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-19, March.
    18. Huang, Yi-Chun & Chen, Chih Ta, 2022. "Exploring institutional pressures, firm green slack, green product innovation and green new product success: Evidence from Taiwan's high-tech industries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    19. Aleksandra Gąsior & Jakub Grabowski & Jarosław Ropęga & Anna Walecka, 2022. "Creating a Competitive Advantage for Micro and Small Enterprises Based on Eco-Innovation as a Determinant of the Energy Efficiency of the Economy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-29, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:6:y:2019:i:1:p:1691833. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://cogentoa.tandfonline.com/OABM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.