IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i18p10417-d638498.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Firm and Board Characteristics, and E-Waste Disclosure: A Study in the Era of Digitalisation

Author

Listed:
  • Hafizah Abd-Mutalib

    (Tunku Puteri Intan Safinaz School of Accountancy, College of Business, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok 06010, Kedah, Malaysia)

  • Che Zuriana Muhammad Jamil

    (Tunku Puteri Intan Safinaz School of Accountancy, College of Business, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok 06010, Kedah, Malaysia)

  • Rapiah Mohamed

    (Tunku Puteri Intan Safinaz School of Accountancy, College of Business, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok 06010, Kedah, Malaysia)

  • Nor Atikah Shafai

    (Tunku Puteri Intan Safinaz School of Accountancy, College of Business, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok 06010, Kedah, Malaysia)

  • Saidatul Nurul Hidayah Jannatun Naim Nor-Ahmad

    (Tunku Puteri Intan Safinaz School of Accountancy, College of Business, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok 06010, Kedah, Malaysia)

Abstract

Business sectors face the advent of digitalisation, bringing attention to e-waste, or waste generated from obsolete electrical and electronic appliances. In addressing this issue, the study intends to examine e-waste disclosure by Bursa Malaysia listed firms. Specifically, this study investigates the extent and quality of e-waste disclosure, observes whether the reporting differs between industries and the boards on which the firms are listed, and investigates if e-waste disclosure is associated with firm and board characteristics. A total of 92 firms in the telecommunication and technology industries, listed on the Main and Ace boards of Bursa Malaysia, were selected as samples. The results reveal that despite an indication that e-waste reporting applies to the two sectors, only 16% of the firms report their commitment to managing e-waste. The disclosure shows how e-waste reporting is low in quantity and is circulated with only very general, qualitative information. An independent sample t -test reveals that firms listed on the Main board report significantly more e-waste information than their counterparts. Another t -test indicates an insignificant difference in e-waste disclosure between the firms under study. Furthermore, firm size significantly impacts e-waste disclosure, while firm performance, board size, and board gender diversity show insignificant impact. The results of this preliminary study shed some light on business firms’ commitment towards their e-waste management and reporting, which is a substantial factor for Malaysia to achieve environmental sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Hafizah Abd-Mutalib & Che Zuriana Muhammad Jamil & Rapiah Mohamed & Nor Atikah Shafai & Saidatul Nurul Hidayah Jannatun Naim Nor-Ahmad, 2021. "Firm and Board Characteristics, and E-Waste Disclosure: A Study in the Era of Digitalisation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-14, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:18:p:10417-:d:638498
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/18/10417/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/18/10417/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Agus Ismaya Hasanudin & Yuliansyah Yuliansyah & Jamaliah Said & Christin Susilowati & Muafi, 2019. "Management control system, corporate social responsibility, and firm performance," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 6(3), pages 1354-1368, March.
    2. Arifur Khan & Mohammad Muttakin & Javed Siddiqui, 2013. "Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosures: Evidence from an Emerging Economy," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 114(2), pages 207-223, May.
    3. Knudsen, Eirik Sjåholm & Lien, Lasse B. & Timmermans, Bram & Belik, Ivan & Pandey, Sujit, 2021. "Stability in turbulent times? The effect of digitalization on the sustainability of competitive advantage," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 360-369.
    4. Bouwman, Harry & Nikou, Shahrokh & de Reuver, Mark, 2019. "Digitalization, business models, and SMEs: How do business model innovation practices improve performance of digitalizing SMEs?," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(9).
    5. Lela Nurlaela Wati & Hj. Ina Primiana & Kashan Pirzada & Rachmat Sudarsono, 2019. "Political connection, blockholder ownership and performance," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 7(1), pages 52-68, September.
    6. Elena Aleksandrovna Mayorova, 2019. "Corporate social responsibility disclosure: evidence from the European retail sector," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 7(2), pages 891-905, December.
    7. Yulius Kurnia Susanto, 2019. "Firm Value, Firm Size and Income Smoothing," GATR Journals jfbr151, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    8. Adetayo Olaniyi Adeniran & Oluwabukunmi Eunice Obembe, 2020. "The significance of strategic management accounting on the performance of transport businesses in Nigeria," Post-Print hal-03271851, HAL.
    9. Lara Tarquinio & Domenico Raucci & Roberto Benedetti, 2018. "An Investigation of Global Reporting Initiative Performance Indicators in Corporate Sustainability Reports: Greek, Italian and Spanish Evidence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-19, March.
    10. Indah Fajarini Sri Wahyuningrum & Mochamad Arief Budihardjo & Fadel Iqbal Muhammad & Hadrian Geri Djajadikerta & Terri Trireksani, 2020. "Do environmental and financial performances affect environmental disclosures? Evidence from listed companies in Indonesia," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 8(2), pages 1047-1061, December.
    11. Adetayo Olaniyi Adeniran & Oluwabukunmi Eunice Obembe, 2020. "The significance of strategic management accounting on the performance of transport businesses in Nigeria," Insights into Regional Development, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 2(3), pages 677-688, September.
    12. de Villiers, Charl & van Staden, Chris J., 2006. "Can less environmental disclosure have a legitimising effect? Evidence from Africa," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 31(8), pages 763-781, November.
    13. Xiaoxia Chen & Mélanie Despeisse & Björn Johansson, 2020. "Environmental Sustainability of Digitalization in Manufacturing: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-31, December.
    14. Ida Bagus Anom Purbawangsa & Solimun Solimun & Adji Achmad Reinaldo Fernandes & Sri Mangesti Rahayu, 2019. "Corporate governance, corporate profitability toward corporate social responsibility disclosure and corporate value (comparative study in Indonesia, China and India stock exchange in 2013-2016)," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 16(7), pages 983-999, August.
    15. Liu, Chelsea, 2018. "Are women greener? Corporate gender diversity and environmental violations," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 118-142.
    16. Nour Nassar & Manuela TvaronaviÄ ienÄ—, 2021. "A systematic theoretical review on sustainable management for green competitiveness," Insights into Regional Development, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 3(2), pages 267-281, June.
    17. Yosra Mnif Sellami & Nada Dammak Ben Hlima & Anis Jarboui, 2019. "An empirical investigation of determinants of sustainability report assurance in France," Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 17(2), pages 320-342, June.
    18. Nopriadi Saputra, 2020. "Transforming into Digital Organization by Orchestrating Culture, Leadership and Competence in Digital Context," GATR Journals gjbssr572, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    19. Francesca Mazzoni, 2020. "Circular economy and eco-innovation in Italian industrial clusters. Best practices from Prato textile cluster," Post-Print hal-03271849, HAL.
    20. Giuliana Birindelli & Antonia Patrizia Iannuzzi & Marco Savioli, 2019. "The impact of women leaders on environmental performance: Evidence on gender diversity in banks," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(6), pages 1485-1499, November.
    21. Liao, Lin & Luo, Le & Tang, Qingliang, 2015. "Gender diversity, board independence, environmental committee and greenhouse gas disclosure," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(4), pages 409-424.
    22. Atang Hermawan & Ardi Gunardi, 2019. "Motivation for disclosure of corporate social responsibility: evidence from banking industry in Indonesia," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 6(3), pages 1297-1306, March.
    23. George Kassinis & Alexia Panayiotou & Andreas Dimou & Georgia Katsifaraki, 2016. "Gender and Environmental Sustainability: A Longitudinal Analysis," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(6), pages 399-412, November.
    24. Natalya Andryeyeva & Oksana Nikishyna & Borys Burkynskyi & Nina Khumarova & Oleksandr Laiko & Hanna Tiutiunnyk, 2021. "Methodology of analysis of the influence of the economic policy of the state on the environment," Post-Print hal-03583921, HAL.
    25. Andreas Andrikopoulos & Nikoleta Kriklani, 2013. "Environmental Disclosure and Financial Characteristics of the Firm: The Case of Denmark," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(1), pages 55-64, January.
    26. Francesca Mazzoni, 2020. "Circular economy and eco-innovation in Italian industrial clusters. Best practices from Prato textile cluster," Insights into Regional Development, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 2(3), pages 661-676, September.
    27. Natalya Andryeyeva & Oksana Nikishyna & Borys Burkynskyi & Nina Khumarova & Oleksandr Laiko & Hanna Tiutiunnyk, 2021. "Methodology of analysis of the influence of the economic policy of the state on the environment," Insights into Regional Development, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 3(2), pages 198-212, June.
    28. Wan Nordin Wan-Hussin & Ameen Qasem & Norhani Aripin & Mohd Shazwan Mohd Ariffin, 2021. "Corporate Responsibility Disclosure, Information Environment and Analysts’ Recommendations: Evidence from Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-27, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hilal Shams & Altaf Hossain Molla & Mohd Nizam Ab Rahman & Hawa Hishamuddin & Zambri Harun & Nallapaneni Manoj Kumar, 2023. "Exploring Industry-Specific Research Themes on E-Waste: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-22, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jonathan Taglialatela & Ivan Miroshnychenko & Roberto Barontini & Francesco Testa, 2024. "Talk or walk? The board of directors and firm environmental strategies," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 2890-2910, May.
    2. Claudio Nuber & Patrick Velte, 2021. "Board gender diversity and carbon emissions: European evidence on curvilinear relationships and critical mass," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 1958-1992, May.
    3. Aye Aye Khin, 2022. "Company Values of Malaysian Listed Companies' Sustainability for Palm Oil Industry: Financial Panel Data Model Approach," GATR Journals afr208, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    4. María‐Florencia Amorelli & Isabel‐María García‐Sánchez, 2021. "Trends in the dynamic evolution of board gender diversity and corporate social responsibility," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(2), pages 537-554, March.
    5. Shubham Singhania & Jagvinder Singh & Deepti Aggrawal, 2023. "Gender diversity on board and corporate sustainability: a quantitative review based on bibliometric mapping," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 14(1), pages 267-286, February.
    6. Venturelli, Valeria & Pedrazzoli, Alessia & Pennetta, Daniela & Gualandri, Elisabetta, 2024. "Pinkwashing in the banking industry: The relevance of board characteristics," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 67(PB).
    7. Pier Luigi Marchini & Veronica Tibiletti & Tatiana Mazza & Gianluca Gabrielli, 2022. "Gender quotas and the environment: Environmental performance and enforcement," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(1), pages 256-272, January.
    8. Giuliana Birindelli & Antonia Patrizia Iannuzzi & Marco Savioli, 2019. "The impact of women leaders on environmental performance: Evidence on gender diversity in banks," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(6), pages 1485-1499, November.
    9. Clara Gallego-Sosa & Yakira Fernández-Torres & Milagros Gutiérrez-Fernández, 2020. "Does Gender Diversity Affect the Environmental Performance of Banks?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-15, December.
    10. Katia Furlotti & Tatiana Mazza & Veronica Tibiletti & Silvia Triani, 2019. "Women in top positions on boards of directors: Gender policies disclosed in Italian sustainability reporting," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(1), pages 57-70, January.
    11. Wadim Strielkowski & Lubomír Civín & Elena Tarkhanova & Manuela Tvaronavičienė & Yelena Petrenko, 2021. "Renewable Energy in the Sustainable Development of Electrical Power Sector: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-24, December.
    12. Giuliana Birindelli & Stefano Dell’Atti & Antonia Patrizia Iannuzzi & Marco Savioli, 2018. "Composition and Activity of the Board of Directors: Impact on ESG Performance in the Banking System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-20, December.
    13. Nicola Cucari & Salvatore Esposito De Falco & Beatrice Orlando, 2018. "Diversity of Board of Directors and Environmental Social Governance: Evidence from Italian Listed Companies," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(3), pages 250-266, May.
    14. Khwaja Naveed & Fahad Khalid & Cosmina Lelia Voinea, 2023. "Board gender diversity and corporate green innovation: An industry‐level institutional perspective," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(2), pages 755-772, March.
    15. Stefania Veltri & Romilda Mazzotta & Franco Ernesto Rubino, 2021. "Board diversity and corporate social performance: Does the family firm status matter?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(6), pages 1664-1679, November.
    16. Tantawy Moussa & Amir Allam & Mahmoud Elmarzouky, 2023. "An examination of UK companies' modern slavery disclosure practices: Does board gender diversity matter?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(8), pages 5382-5402, December.
    17. Ayman Issa & Mohammad A. A. Zaid & Jalal Rajeh Hanaysha, 2022. "Exploring the relationship between female director's profile and sustainability performance: Evidence from the Middle East," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(6), pages 1980-2002, September.
    18. Beloskar, Ved Dilip & Haldar, Arunima & Gupta, Anupama, 2024. "Gender equality and women’s empowerment: A bibliometric review of the literature on SDG 5 through the management lens," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    19. Khine Kyaw & Sirimon Treepongkaruna & Pornsit Jiraporn, 2022. "Board gender diversity and environmental emissions," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 2871-2881, November.
    20. Nurlan Orazalin & Mady Baydauletov, 2020. "Corporate social responsibility strategy and corporate environmental and social performance: The moderating role of board gender diversity," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 1664-1676, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:18:p:10417-:d:638498. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.