IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i10p5591-d556235.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Review of Whole System Simulation Methodologies for Assessing Mobility as a Service (MaaS) as an Enabler for Sustainable Urban Mobility

Author

Listed:
  • Mark Muller

    (College of Engineering, Villanova University, Villanova, PA 19085, USA)

  • Seri Park

    (College of Engineering, Villanova University, Villanova, PA 19085, USA)

  • Ross Lee

    (College of Engineering, Villanova University, Villanova, PA 19085, USA)

  • Brett Fusco

    (Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission, Philadelphia, PA 19106-1520, USA)

  • Gonçalo Homem de Almeida Correia

    (Department of Transport & Planning, TU Delft, 2628 CN Delft, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Mobility as a Service (MaaS) is an emerging concept that is being advanced as an effective approach to improve the sustainability of mobility, especially in densely populated urban areas. MaaS can be defined as the integration of various transport modes into a single service, accessible on demand, via a seamless digital planning and payment application. Recent studies have shown the potential reduction in the size of automobile fleets, with corresponding predicted improvements in congestion and environmental impact, that might be realized by the advent of automated vehicles as part of future MaaS systems. However, the limiting assumptions made by these studies point to the difficult challenge of predicting how the complex interactions of user demographics and mode choice, vehicle automation, and governance models will impact sustainable mobility. The work documented in this paper focused on identifying available methodologies for assessing the sustainability impact of potential MaaS implementations from a whole system (STEEP—social, technical, economic, environmental, and political) perspective. In this research, a review was conducted of current simulation tools and models, relative to their ability to support transportation planners, to assess the MaaS concept, holistically, at a city level. The results presented include: a summary of the literature review, a weighted ranking of relevant transportation simulation tools per the assessment criteria, and identification of key gaps in the current state of the art. The gaps include capturing the interaction of demographic changes, mode choice, induced demand, and land use in a single framework that can rapidly explore the impact of alternative MaaS scenarios, on sustainable mobility, for a given city region. These gaps will guide future assessment methodologies for urban mobility systems, and ultimately assist informed decision-making.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark Muller & Seri Park & Ross Lee & Brett Fusco & Gonçalo Homem de Almeida Correia, 2021. "Review of Whole System Simulation Methodologies for Assessing Mobility as a Service (MaaS) as an Enabler for Sustainable Urban Mobility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-15, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:10:p:5591-:d:556235
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/10/5591/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/10/5591/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Solomani Coulibaly & Zhongsheng Hua, 2006. "A scientific basis for the choice of scale in QFD," International Journal of Services and Operations Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(2), pages 124-145.
    2. Anastasia Roukouni & Gonçalo Homem de Almeida Correia, 2020. "Evaluation Methods for the Impacts of Shared Mobility: Classification and Critical Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-22, December.
    3. Sustainable Mobility for All, 2017. "Global Mobility Report 2017," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 28542.
    4. Itf, 2015. "Urban Mobility System Upgrade: How shared self-driving cars could change city traffic," International Transport Forum Policy Papers 6, OECD Publishing.
    5. Wong, Yale Z. & Hensher, David A. & Mulley, Corinne, 2020. "Mobility as a service (MaaS): Charting a future context," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 5-19.
    6. Markus Friedrich & Maximilian Hartl & Christoph Magg, 2018. "A modeling approach for matching ridesharing trips within macroscopic travel demand models," Transportation, Springer, vol. 45(6), pages 1639-1653, November.
    7. Caiati, Valeria & Rasouli, Soora & Timmermans, Harry, 2020. "Bundling, pricing schemes and extra features preferences for mobility as a service: Sequential portfolio choice experiment," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 123-148.
    8. Itf, 2018. "The Shared-Use City: Managing the Curb," International Transport Forum Policy Papers 56, OECD Publishing.
    9. Itf, 2017. "Shared Mobility Simulations for Helsinki," International Transport Forum Policy Papers 39, OECD Publishing.
    10. Becker, Henrik & Balac, Milos & Ciari, Francesco & Axhausen, Kay W., 2020. "Assessing the welfare impacts of Shared Mobility and Mobility as a Service (MaaS)," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 228-243.
    11. Itf, 2018. "Shared Mobility Simulations for Dublin," International Transport Forum Policy Papers 58, OECD Publishing.
    12. Itf, 2017. "Shared Mobility Simulations for Auckland," International Transport Forum Policy Papers 41, OECD Publishing.
    13. Pangbourne, Kate & Mladenović, Miloš N. & Stead, Dominic & Milakis, Dimitris, 2020. "Questioning mobility as a service: Unanticipated implications for society and governance," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 35-49.
    14. Liljamo, Timo & Liimatainen, Heikki & Pöllänen, Markus & Utriainen, Roni, 2020. "People’s current mobility costs and willingness to pay for Mobility as a Service offerings," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 99-119.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Manuel Rey-Moreno & Rafael Periáñez-Cristóbal & Arturo Calvo-Mora, 2022. "Reflections on Sustainable Urban Mobility, Mobility as a Service (MaaS) and Adoption Models," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Medina-Molina, Cayetano & Pérez-Macías, Noemí & Fernández-Fernádez, José Luis, 2023. "The use of micromobility in different contexts. An explanation through the multilevel perspective and QCA," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    3. Dorsa Alipour & Hussein Dia, 2023. "A Systematic Review of the Role of Land Use, Transport, and Energy-Environment Integration in Shaping Sustainable Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-29, April.
    4. Konstantina Anastasiadou & Nikolaos Gavanas & Christos Pyrgidis & Magda Pitsiava-Latinopoulou, 2021. "Identifying and Prioritizing Sustainable Urban Mobility Barriers through a Modified Delphi-AHP Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-18, September.
    5. Sara Paiva & António Amaral & Joana Gonçalves & Rui Lima & Luis Barreto, 2022. "Image Recognition-Based Architecture to Enhance Inclusive Mobility of Visually Impaired People in Smart and Urban Environments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-19, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lopez-Carreiro, Iria & Monzon, Andres & Lopez-Lambas, Maria E., 2021. "Comparison of the willingness to adopt MaaS in Madrid (Spain) and Randstad (The Netherlands) metropolitan areas," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 275-294.
    2. Nikitas, Alexandros & Cotet, Corneliu & Vitel, Alexandra-Elena & Nikitas, Nikolaos & Prato, Carlo, 2024. "Transport stakeholders’ perceptions of Mobility-as-a-Service: A Q-study of cultural shift proponents, policy advocates and technology supporters," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    3. Ho, Chinh Q. & Tirachini, Alejandro, 2024. "Mobility-as-a-Service and the role of multimodality in the sustainability of urban mobility in developing and developed countries," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 161-176.
    4. Timo Liljamo & Heikki Liimatainen & Markus Pöllänen & Riku Viri, 2021. "The Effects of Mobility as a Service and Autonomous Vehicles on People’s Willingness to Own a Car in the Future," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-28, February.
    5. Reck, Daniel J. & Hensher, David A. & Ho, Chinh Q., 2020. "MaaS bundle design," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 485-501.
    6. Ho, Chinh Q. & Hensher, David A. & Reck, Daniel J. & Lorimer, Sam & Lu, Ivy, 2021. "MaaS bundle design and implementation: Lessons from the Sydney MaaS trial," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 339-376.
    7. Canzler, Weert & Knie, Andreas, 2023. "The future of mobility: Winners and losers and new options in the public space," Discussion Papers, Research Group Digital Mobility and Social Differentiation SP III 2023-601, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    8. Liu, Jianing & Wen, Xiao & Jian, Sisi, 2024. "Toward better equity: Analyzing travel patterns through a neural network approach in mobility-as-a-service," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 110-126.
    9. Ruhrort, Lisa, 2020. "Reassessing the Role of Shared Mobility Services in a Transport Transition: Can They Contribute the Rise of an Alternative Socio-Technical Regime of Mobility?," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 12(19), pages 1-1.
    10. Feng, Hailin & Lv, Haibin & Lv, Zhihan, 2023. "Resilience towarded Digital Twins to improve the adaptability of transportation systems," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    11. Tom Storme & Corneel Casier & Hossein Azadi & Frank Witlox, 2021. "Impact Assessments of New Mobility Services: A Critical Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-20, March.
    12. Kriswardhana, Willy & Esztergár-Kiss, Domokos, 2023. "Exploring the aspects of MaaS adoption based on college students’ preferences," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 113-125.
    13. Ye, Jianhong & Zheng, Jiaqi, 2024. "How stakeholders influence MaaS implementation? An analysis based on evolutionary game theory," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 198-210.
    14. Iria Lopez-Carreiro & Andres Monzon & Elena Lopez, 2023. "MaaS Implications in the Smart City: A Multi-Stakeholder Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-27, July.
    15. Tsouros, Ioannis & Tsirimpa, Athena & Pagoni, Ioanna & Polydoropoulou, Amalia, 2021. "MaaS users: Who they are and how much they are willing-to-pay," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 470-480.
    16. Kayikci, Yasanur & Kabadurmus, Ozgur, 2022. "Barriers to the adoption of the mobility-as-a-service concept: The case of Istanbul, a large emerging metropolis," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 219-236.
    17. Dadashzadeh, Nima & Woods, Lee & Ouelhadj, Djamila & Thomopoulos, Nikolas & Kamargianni, Maria & Antoniou, Constantinos, 2022. "Mobility as a Service Inclusion Index (MaaSINI): Evaluation of inclusivity in MaaS systems and policy recommendations," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 191-202.
    18. Lisa Ruhrort, 2020. "Reassessing the Role of Shared Mobility Services in a Transport Transition: Can They Contribute the Rise of an Alternative Socio-Technical Regime of Mobility?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-24, October.
    19. He, Brian Yueshuai & Zhou, Jinkai & Ma, Ziyi & Wang, Ding & Sha, Di & Lee, Mina & Chow, Joseph Y.J. & Ozbay, Kaan, 2021. "A validated multi-agent simulation test bed to evaluate congestion pricing policies on population segments by time-of-day in New York City," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 145-161.
    20. Haarstad, Håvard & Sareen, Siddharth & Kandt, Jens & Coenen, Lars & Cook, Matthew, 2022. "Beyond automobility? Lock-in of past failures in low-carbon urban mobility innovations," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:10:p:5591-:d:556235. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.