IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/itfaac/56-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Shared-Use City: Managing the Curb

Author

Listed:
  • ITF

Abstract

This report discusses the street design and pricing implications of a large-scale introduction of ride-sharing services and other innovative mobility options in urban settings. It looks at the potential for a shift away from a model of the use of curb space focused on street parking to one that makes more flexible use of curb space for pick-up and drop-off zones for passengers and freight. The study presents the results of quantitative modelling of alternative curb-use scenarios and discusses their relative efficiency, contribution to wider policy objectives and implications on city revenues.

Suggested Citation

  • Itf, 2018. "The Shared-Use City: Managing the Curb," International Transport Forum Policy Papers 56, OECD Publishing.
    • Handle: RePEc:oec:itfaac:56-en
    DOI: 10.1787/3af82772-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/3af82772-en
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/3af82772-en?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jaller, Miguel & Rodier, Caroline & Zhang, Michael & Lin, Huachao & Lewis, Kathryn, 2021. "Fighting for Curb Space: Parking, Ride-Hailing, Urban Freight Deliveries, and Other Users," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt3jn371hw, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    2. Mark Muller & Seri Park & Ross Lee & Brett Fusco & Gonçalo Homem de Almeida Correia, 2021. "Review of Whole System Simulation Methodologies for Assessing Mobility as a Service (MaaS) as an Enabler for Sustainable Urban Mobility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-15, May.
    3. Ruhrort, Lisa, 2020. "Reassessing the Role of Shared Mobility Services in a Transport Transition: Can They Contribute the Rise of an Alternative Socio-Technical Regime of Mobility?," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 12(19), pages 1-1.
    4. Sellars, Sarah C. & Schnitkey, Gary D. & Gentry, Laura F., 2023. "Cover Crops on Illinois Farms," Journal of the ASFMRA, American Society of Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers, vol. 2023, January.
    5. Alexandra König & Christina Wirth & Jan Grippenkoven, 2021. "Generation Y’s Information Needs Concerning Sharing Rides in Autonomous Mobility on Demand Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-19, July.
    6. Shaheen, Susan & Darling, Wesley & Broader, Jacquelyn & Cohen, Adam, 2021. "Understanding Curb Management and Targeted Incentive Policies to Increase Transportation Network Company Pooling and Public Transit Linkages," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt6gz9w0v9, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    7. Canzler, Weert & Knie, Andreas, 2023. "The future of mobility: Winners and losers and new options in the public space," Discussion Papers, Research Group Digital Mobility and Social Differentiation SP III 2023-601, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    8. Lisa Ruhrort, 2020. "Reassessing the Role of Shared Mobility Services in a Transport Transition: Can They Contribute the Rise of an Alternative Socio-Technical Regime of Mobility?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-24, October.
    9. dos Santos Almeida, Alexsandro Claudio & Mamédio, Mário Roberto & Goelzer, Ademar & Rodrigues, Lucas Araujo & Mateos, Luciano, 2023. "Shared centre pivot. An experience of smallholder irrigation in Midwest Brazil," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    10. Zhang, Wenwen & Wang, Kaidi, 2020. "Parking futures: Shared automated vehicles and parking demand reduction trajectories in Atlanta," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:itfaac:56-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itoecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.