IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i1p293-d195862.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable Urban Development System Measurement Based on Dissipative Structure Theory, the Grey Entropy Method and Coupling Theory: A Case Study in Chengdu, China

Author

Listed:
  • Qunxi Gong

    (Business School, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China)

  • Min Chen

    (Business School, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China)

  • Xianli Zhao

    (Business School, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China)

  • Zhigeng Ji

    (Marxism School, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610207, China)

Abstract

With the rapid advancement of urbanization, the sustainable development of the city has received more and more attention. The measurement of the sustainable development of a city can provide an important reference for the development of the city. Therefore, this paper firstly constructs an index system for five dimensions: society, the economy, the environment, resources, and technology. Then, a sustainable development measurement model is established based on dissipative structure theory, grey entropy and coupling theory, and the evolution trend and coordinated development of the city are measured. Finally, Chengdu, an important central city in the western region of China, is selected for sustainable development measurement research, from which it was found that the city became more sustainable and more orderly, the development level was constantly improving, and the coordination was continuously improving, which was consistent with the actual situation and indicated that the proposed measurement model could effectively measure and evaluate sustainable urban development.

Suggested Citation

  • Qunxi Gong & Min Chen & Xianli Zhao & Zhigeng Ji, 2019. "Sustainable Urban Development System Measurement Based on Dissipative Structure Theory, the Grey Entropy Method and Coupling Theory: A Case Study in Chengdu, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-19, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:1:p:293-:d:195862
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/1/293/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/1/293/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ambreen Ghalib & Abdul Qadir & Sajid Rashid Ahmad, 2017. "Evaluation of Developmental Progress in Some Cities of Punjab, Pakistan, Using Urban Sustainability Indicators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-17, August.
    2. Bohong Zheng & Komi Bernard Bedra, 2018. "Recent Sustainability Performance in China: Strength-Weakness Analysis and Ranking of Provincial Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-26, August.
    3. Lin Ding & Zhenfeng Shao & Hanchao Zhang & Cong Xu & Dewen Wu, 2016. "A Comprehensive Evaluation of Urban Sustainable Development in China Based on the TOPSIS-Entropy Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-23, August.
    4. Li Shen & Jared M. Kyllo & Xulin Guo, 2013. "An Integrated Model Based on a Hierarchical Indices System for Monitoring and Evaluating Urban Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-36, February.
    5. Xuedong Liang & Weiwei Zhang & Lei Chen & Fumin Deng, 2016. "Sustainable Urban Development Capacity Measure—A Case Study in Jiangsu Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-13, March.
    6. William H. Alfonso Piña & Clara Inés Pardo Martínez, 2016. "Development and Urban Sustainability: An Analysis of Efficiency Using Data Envelopment Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-15, February.
    7. Matthew Cohen, 2017. "A Systematic Review of Urban Sustainability Assessment Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-16, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shen Zhao & Yiyao Tian, 2023. "The Feasibility of Constructing a Greenhouse Gas Emission Assessment System in China and Its Legislative Path," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, February.
    2. Zhiguo Xu & Zheng Liu & Hua Qin & Lei Ma, 2019. "The Sustainable Development of Land-Lost Peasants’ Citizenization: A Case Study of Dongbang Town, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-15, October.
    3. Jianwan Ji & Shixin Wang & Yi Zhou & Wenliang Liu & Litao Wang, 2021. "Spatiotemporal Change and Coordinated Development Analysis of “Population-Society-Economy-Resource-Ecology-Environment” in the Jing-Jin-Ji Urban Agglomeration from 2000 to 2015," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-17, April.
    4. Yue Hu & Siwei Lu & Huiyuan Zhang & Guibo Liu & Jiangang Peng, 2021. "Empirical Analysis on the Performance of Rural Credit Cooperative’s Shareholding Reform Based on the Rationale of Isomorphic Incentive Compatibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-29, March.
    5. Xiaowei Ni & Yongbo Quan, 2023. "Measuring the Sustainable Development of Marine Economy Based on the Entropy Value Method: A Case Study in the Yangtze River Delta, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-16, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fang‐Li Ruan & Liang Yan, 2022. "Challenges facing indicators to become a universal language for sustainable urban development," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(1), pages 41-57, February.
    2. Weiwei Li & Pingtao Yi & Danning Zhang, 2018. "Sustainability Evaluation of Cities in Northeastern China Using Dynamic TOPSIS-Entropy Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-15, December.
    3. Pingtao Yi & Lu Wang & Danning Zhang & Weiwei Li, 2019. "Sustainability Assessment of Provincial-Level Regions in China Using Composite Sustainable Indicator," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-20, September.
    4. Lei Wang & Ruyin Long & Hong Chen, 2017. "Study of Urban Energy Performance Assessment and Its Influencing Factors Based on Improved Stochastic Frontier Analysis: A Case Study of Provincial Capitals in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-18, June.
    5. Yuantong Jiang & Shoukai Sun & Yening Wang & Shuanning Zheng, 2018. "Niche Evolution of China’s Provincial Social–Economic–Natural Complex Ecosystems, 2005–2015," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-19, August.
    6. Pin Li & Jinsuo Zhang, 2019. "Is China’s Energy Supply Sustainable? New Research Model Based on the Exponential Smoothing and GM(1,1) Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-30, January.
    7. Fiaz Ahmad Sulehri & Saba Sharif, 2022. "The Impact of Firm Sustainability on Firm Growth: Evidence from USA," Journal of Policy Research (JPR), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 8(2), pages 1-15, August.
    8. Gyula Dörgő & Viktor Sebestyén & János Abonyi, 2018. "Evaluating the Interconnectedness of the Sustainable Development Goals Based on the Causality Analysis of Sustainability Indicators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-26, October.
    9. Anibal Gusso & Cristina Cafruni & Fabiane Bordin & Mauricio Roberto Veronez & Leticia Lenz & Sabrina Crija, 2015. "Multi-Temporal Patterns of Urban Heat Island as Response to Economic Growth Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-17, March.
    10. Javier García López & Raffaele Sisto & Javier Benayas & Álvaro de Juanes & Julio Lumbreras & Carlos Mataix, 2021. "Assessment of the Results and Methodology of the Sustainable Development Index for Spanish Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-29, June.
    11. Wenyao Guo & Xianzhong Mu, 2022. "Identification of Cities in Underdeveloped Resource-Rich Areas and Its Sustainable Development: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-16, October.
    12. Oana Țugulea, 2017. "City Brand Personality—Relations with Dimensions and Dimensions Inter-Relations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-22, December.
    13. Ying Zhou & Weiwei Li & Pingtao Yi & Chengju Gong, 2019. "Evaluation of City Sustainability from the Perspective of Behavioral Guidance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-17, November.
    14. Jindamas Sutthichaimethee & Kuskana Kubaha, 2018. "The Relationship of Causal Factors Affecting the Future Equilibrium Change of Total Final Energy Consumption in Thailand’s Construction Sector under a Sustainable Development Goal: Enriching the SE-VA," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-18, December.
    15. Luiza Ossowska & Dorota Janiszewska & Natalia Bartkowiak-Bakun & Grzegorz Kwiatkowski, 2020. "Energy Consumption Versus Greenhouse Gas Emissions in EU," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 185-198.
    16. Hongqiang Wang & Linlin Zheng & Yingjie Zhang, 2022. "Research on Dynamic Comprehensive Evaluation of Metropolitan Area Development Level Based on Quadratic Weighting: A Case Study of Four Metropolitan Areas in the Yangtze River Delta Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-17, September.
    17. Ferretti, Paola & Zolin, Maria Bruna & Ferraro, Giacomo, 2020. "Relationships among sustainability dimensions: evidence from an Alpine area case study using Dominance-based Rough Set Approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    18. Irene Martínez Reverte & Tomás Gómez-Navarro & Carlos Sánchez-Díaz & Carla Montagud Montalvá, 2022. "Evaluation of Alternatives for Energy Supply from Fuel Cells in Compact Cities in the Mediterranean Climate; Case Study: City of Valencia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-30, June.
    19. Attila Buzási & Bettina Szimonetta Jäger, 2021. "Exploratory Analysis of Urban Sustainability by Applying a Strategy-Based Tailor-Made Weighting Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-18, June.
    20. Francis Rathinam & Sayak Khatua & Zeba Siddiqui & Manya Malik & Pallavi Duggal & Samantha Watson & Xavier Vollenweider, 2021. "Using big data for evaluating development outcomes: A systematic map," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(3), September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:1:p:293-:d:195862. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.