IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i5p1997-d328871.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Glass Waste 3 : A Preliminary Study for a New Industrial Recovery Processing

Author

Listed:
  • Rossana Bellopede

    (Department of Environment, Land and Infrastructure Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi, 24, 10129 Torino, Italy)

  • Lorena Zichella

    (Department of Environment, Land and Infrastructure Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi, 24, 10129 Torino, Italy)

  • Paola Marini

    (Department of Environment, Land and Infrastructure Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi, 24, 10129 Torino, Italy)

Abstract

In recent times, the selection and treatment of glass waste are implemented in processing plants where a secondary raw material (SRM) named glass cullet, which is suitable for glass production, and a waste containing a high percentage of glass (glass waste 2 ) is obtained. In the literature, there are many studies conducted on the recovery of the cullet, while few are the studies on the recovery of the waste that is produced by cullet processing. According to the 2013 Joint Research Centre (JRC) Reference report, the cullet produces savings in terms of energy and raw materials. However, it has a high current cost and its availability is becoming difficult, therefore its use is not always economically advantageous. The goal and strategy of the European Union is zero waste. For this purpose, further treatment of glass waste has been investigated. Through the industrial treatment of the glass waste 2 , a glass waste 3 constituted again by an SRM made of glass is obtained together with a high quantity of presumed SRM (e.g., heavy plastic, corks, iron, non-ferrous metals, etc.). The process treatment separating these SRMs from the glass waste 3 is, in this case, a pilot plant that needs to be optimized in order to reach an economic and sustainable industrial process solution. In particular, the materials to be recycled are exploitable product fractions with different particle sizes and physical properties (such as density, shape and resistance). This research is based on data collected from a North Italy process plant and is aimed at solving the issue of waste in this kind of process by implementing a pilot plant already present. Representative samples of feed material (glass waste 3 ) and different products of the pilot plant have been analyzed. Moreover, laboratory tests were executed to improve separation efficiency and to valorize the different product fractions. A flow sheet of a new treatment plant has been developed and an economic evaluation has been made. The materials that will be separated in the new plant could be traded as SRM—e.g., plastics, metals, synthetic and cork stoppers—which constitute almost 90% of the total feed of the plant.

Suggested Citation

  • Rossana Bellopede & Lorena Zichella & Paola Marini, 2020. "Glass Waste 3 : A Preliminary Study for a New Industrial Recovery Processing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-11, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:5:p:1997-:d:328871
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/5/1997/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/5/1997/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mario Testa & Ornella Malandrino & Maria Rosaria Sessa & Stefania Supino & Daniela Sica, 2017. "Long-Term Sustainability from the Perspective of Cullet Recycling in the Container Glass Industry: Evidence from Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-19, October.
    2. LECOMTE Thierry & FERRERIA DE LA FUENTE Jose Felix & NEUWAHL Frederik & CANOVA Michele & PINASSEAU Antoine & JANKOV Ivan & BRINKMANN Thomas & ROUDIER Serge & DELGADO SANCHO Luis, 2017. "Best Available Techniques (BAT) Reference Document for Large Combustion Plants. Industrial Emissions Directive 2010/75/EU (Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control)," JRC Research Reports JRC107769, Joint Research Centre.
    3. Luis Delgado Sancho & Ana Sofia Catarino & Peter Eder & Donald Litten & Zheng Luo & Alejandro Villanueva Krzyzaniak, 2009. "End-of-Waste Criteria," JRC Research Reports JRC53238, Joint Research Centre.
    4. Serge Roudier & Luis Delgado Sancho & Bianca Scalet & Marcos Garcia Muñoz & Aivi, 2013. "Best Available Techniques (BAT) Reference Document for the Manufacture of Glass: Industrial Emissions Directive 2010/75/EU:(Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control)," JRC Research Reports JRC78091, Joint Research Centre.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mario Testa & Ornella Malandrino & Maria Rosaria Sessa & Stefania Supino & Daniela Sica, 2017. "Long-Term Sustainability from the Perspective of Cullet Recycling in the Container Glass Industry: Evidence from Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-19, October.
    2. Alessandra Cantini & Leonardo Leoni & Filippo De Carlo & Marcello Salvio & Chiara Martini & Fabrizio Martini, 2021. "Technological Energy Efficiency Improvements in Cement Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-28, March.
    3. Letizia Lo Presti & Mario Testa & Vittoria Marino & Pierpaolo Singer, 2019. "Engagement in Healthcare Systems: Adopting Digital Tools for a Sustainable Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, January.
    4. Marco Abis & Martina Bruno & Kerstin Kuchta & Franz-Georg Simon & Raul Grönholm & Michel Hoppe & Silvia Fiore, 2020. "Assessment of the Synergy between Recycling and Thermal Treatments in Municipal Solid Waste Management in Europe," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-15, December.
    5. Pekka Taskinen & Katri Avarmaa, 2021. "Simulation of Slag–Matte/Metal Equilibria for Complex and Low-Grade Raw Materials," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-13, November.
    6. Mahmoud Abu-Saleem & Yan Zhuge & Reza Hassanli & Mark Ellis & Md Mizanur Rahman & Peter Levett, 2021. "Impact Resistance and Sodium Sulphate Attack Testing of Concrete Incorporating Mixed Types of Recycled Plastic Waste," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-18, August.
    7. Paul Suski & Klaus Wiesen, 2016. "Einsatz von Sekundärmaterial vs. recyclinggerechtes Design: Diskussion verschiedener End-of-Life-Allokationen unter Berücksichtigung der europäischen Abfallhierarchie [Use of secondary material vs ," Sustainability Nexus Forum, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 7-13, June.
    8. Arijit Bhattacharya & Shefali Srivastava & Abhijit Majumdar, 2024. "Circular supply chains in manufacturing—Quo vadis? Accomplishments, challenges and future opportunities," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(5), pages 4397-4423, July.
    9. Karolina Sobieraj & Sylwia Stegenta-Dąbrowska & Jacek A. Koziel & Andrzej Białowiec, 2021. "Modeling of CO Accumulation in the Headspace of the Bioreactor during Organic Waste Composting," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-17, March.
    10. Panagiotis Grammelis & Nikolaos Margaritis & Petros Dallas & Dimitrios Rakopoulos & Georgios Mavrias, 2021. "A Review on Management of End of Life Tires (ELTs) and Alternative Uses of Textile Fibers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-20, January.
    11. Furszyfer Del Rio, Dylan D. & Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Foley, Aoife M. & Griffiths, Steve & Bazilian, Morgan & Kim, Jinsoo & Rooney, David, 2022. "Decarbonizing the glass industry: A critical and systematic review of developments, sociotechnical systems and policy options," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    12. Pasquale Pazienza & Caterina De Lucia, 2020. "The EU policy for a plastic economy: Reflections on a sectoral implementation strategy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 779-788, February.
    13. Magdalena Rybaczewska-Błażejowska & Aneta Masternak-Janus, 2021. "Assessing and Improving the Eco-Efficiency of Manufacturing: Learning and Challenges from a Polish Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-20, December.
    14. Leonardo Leoni & Alessandra Cantini & Filippo De Carlo & Marcello Salvio & Chiara Martini & Claudia Toro & Fabrizio Martini, 2021. "Energy-Saving Technology Opportunities and Investments of the Italian Foundry Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-29, December.
    15. Jiménez-Rivero, Ana & García-Navarro, Justo, 2017. "Exploring factors influencing post-consumer gypsum recycling and landfilling in the European Union," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 116-123.
    16. Łukasz Bartela & Paweł Gładysz & Charalampos Andreades & Staffan Qvist & Janusz Zdeb, 2021. "Techno-Economic Assessment of Coal-Fired Power Unit Decarbonization Retrofit with KP-FHR Small Modular Reactors," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-25, April.
    17. Maedeh Rahnama Mobarakeh & Miguel Santos Silva & Thomas Kienberger, 2021. "Pulp and Paper Industry: Decarbonisation Technology Assessment to Reach CO 2 Neutral Emissions—An Austrian Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-30, February.
    18. Marie Kampmann Eriksen & Anders Damgaard & Alessio Boldrin & Thomas Fruergaard Astrup, 2019. "Quality Assessment and Circularity Potential of Recovery Systems for Household Plastic Waste," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 23(1), pages 156-168, February.
    19. Wachter, Philipp & Gaber, Christian & Demuth, Martin & Hochenauer, Christoph, 2020. "Experimental investigation of tri-reforming on a stationary, recuperative TCR-reformer applied to an oxy-fuel combustion of natural gas, using a Ni-catalyst," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    20. Carlo Cravero & Davide De Domenico, 2019. "The Use of CFD for the Design and Development of Innovative Configurations in Regenerative Glass Production Furnaces," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-17, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:5:p:1997-:d:328871. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.