IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i3p812-d311862.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research Progress of Energy Utilization of Agricultural Waste in China: Bibliometric Analysis by Citespace

Author

Listed:
  • Jiapei Wei

    (School of Business Administration, Guangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanning 530004, China
    Business School, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China)

  • Gefu Liang

    (Business School, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China)

  • James Alex

    (School of Electrical Engineering, Computing and Mathematical Sciences, Curtin University, Perth 6102, Australia)

  • Tongchao Zhang

    (School of Economics & Management, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China)

  • Chunbo Ma

    (UWA School of Agriculture and Environment, University of Western Australia, Perth 6009, Australia)

Abstract

Energy utilization of agricultural waste, due to the depletion of petroleum resources and the continuous deterioration of the ecological environment, has become an increasingly important development area at present, with broad prospects. The Citespace software was used to systematically summarize the research hotspots, development, and frontiers of researches on the energy utilization of agricultural waste in China from 1999 to 2018. The results show that (1) the number of publications in this field has increased, which includes a steady development stage, a rapid development stage, and a fluctuation and decline stage. (2) Research hotspots focused on technology for energy utilization of agricultural waste, benefits analysis of energy utilization of agricultural waste, energy conversion and upgrading path of agricultural waste, and energy potential of agricultural waste. (3) Development of research hotspots go through five stages: “technology for energy utilization of straw and the disposal of livestock and poultry waste”, “exploration of energy utilization mode of agricultural waste and the disposal of by-product from energy utilization of agricultural waste”, “technology upgrading from agricultural waste to fuel ethanol and recycling of livestock and poultry waste”, “resource recycling of by-product from biogas ” and “energy utilization of livestock and slaughterhouse waste”. It has revealed the focus in this field was changing from planting waste to breeding waste, and from unprocessed waste to by-product from energy utilization. (4) Energy utilization of slaughterhouse waste and cow manure has started to be considered as the frontiers of researches.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiapei Wei & Gefu Liang & James Alex & Tongchao Zhang & Chunbo Ma, 2020. "Research Progress of Energy Utilization of Agricultural Waste in China: Bibliometric Analysis by Citespace," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-22, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:3:p:812-:d:311862
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/3/812/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/3/812/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Scarlat, Nicolae & Dallemand, Jean-François & Fahl, Fernando, 2018. "Biogas: Developments and perspectives in Europe," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(PA), pages 457-472.
    2. Bilandzija, Nikola & Voca, Neven & Jelcic, Barbara & Jurisic, Vanja & Matin, Ana & Grubor, Mateja & Kricka, Tajana, 2018. "Evaluation of Croatian agricultural solid biomass energy potential," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 225-230.
    3. Lam, Pak Sui & Lam, Pak Yiu & Sokhansanj, Shahab & Lim, C. Jim & Bi, Xiaotao T. & Stephen, James D. & Pribowo, Amadeus & Mabee, Warren E., 2015. "Steam explosion of oil palm residues for the production of durable pellets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 160-166.
    4. Xue, Shengrong & Song, Jinghui & Wang, Xiaojiao & Shang, Zezhou & Sheng, Chenjing & Li, Chongyuan & Zhu, Yufan & Liu, Jingyu, 2020. "A systematic comparison of biogas development and related policies between China and Europe and corresponding insights," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    5. Wang, Xiaojiao & Lu, Xingang & Yang, Gaihe & Feng, Yongzhong & Ren, Guangxin & Han, Xinhui, 2016. "Development process and probable future transformations of rural biogas in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 703-712.
    6. Selvaggi, Roberta & Pappalardo, Gioacchino & Chinnici, Gaetano & Fabbri, Claudio I., 2018. "Assessing land efficiency of biomethane industry: A case study of Sicily," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 689-695.
    7. Erakhrumen, Andrew Agbontalor, 2014. "Growing pertinence of bioenergy in formal/informal global energy schemes: Necessity for optimising awareness strategies and increased investments in renewable energy technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 305-311.
    8. Scarlat, Nicolae & Fahl, Fernando & Dallemand, Jean-François & Monforti, Fabio & Motola, Vicenzo, 2018. "A spatial analysis of biogas potential from manure in Europe," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 915-930.
    9. Maria Raimondo & Francesco Caracciolo & Luigi Cembalo & Gaetano Chinnici & Biagio Pecorino & Mario D’Amico, 2018. "Making Virtue Out of Necessity: Managing the Citrus Waste Supply Chain for Bioeconomy Applications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-20, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alan, Hale & Köker, Ali Rıza, 2023. "Analyzing and mapping agricultural waste recycling research: An integrative review for conceptual framework and future directions," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PB).
    2. Shulun Han & Li Bai & Mingshu Chi & Xiuling Xu & Zhao Chen & Kecheng Yu, 2022. "Conversion of Waste Corn Straw to Value-Added Fuel via Hydrothermal Carbonization after Acid Washing," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-14, March.
    3. Koondhar, Mansoor Ahmed & Shahbaz, Muhammad & Memon, Kamran Ali & Ozturk, Ilhan & Rong, Kong, 2020. "A visualization review analysis of the last two decades for Environmental Kuznets Curve “EKC” based on co-citation analysis theory and pathfinder network scaling algorithms," MPRA Paper 104949, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 18 Dec 2020.
    4. Chen Li & Xiaohui Ji & Xuegang Luo, 2020. "Visualizing Hotspots and Future Trends in Phytomining Research Through Scientometrics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-17, June.
    5. Paweł Kut & Katarzyna Pietrucha-Urbanik & Martina Zeleňáková, 2024. "Assessing the Role of Hydrogen in Sustainable Energy Futures: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis of Research and International Collaborations in Energy and Environmental Engineering," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-26, April.
    6. Amrollah Shamsi & Rafaela Carolina Silva & Ting Wang & N. Vasantha Raju & Karen Santos-d’Amorim, 2022. "A grey zone for bibliometrics: publications indexed in Web of Science as anonymous," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(10), pages 5989-6009, October.
    7. Pratichi Singh & Swetanshu & Rajesh Yadav & Hadi Erfani & Shagufta Jabin & Sapana Jadoun, 2024. "Revisiting the modern approach to manage agricultural solid waste: an innovative solution," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(7), pages 16337-16361, July.
    8. Lihong Wang & Zaiwu Gong & Linna Shi & Zewen Hu & Ashfaq Ahmad Shah, 2021. "Knowledge mapping analysis of research progress and frontiers in integrated disaster risk management in a changing climate," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 107(3), pages 2033-2052, July.
    9. Yanran Liu & Tingting Tian & Xinyu Hao & Qin Zhang & Chengyan Yao & Guangfu Liu, 2021. "Promotion of Household Waste Utilization in China: Lessons Learnt from Three Case Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-14, October.
    10. Xiaoe Ding & Minrui Zheng & Xinqi Zheng, 2021. "The Application of Genetic Algorithm in Land Use Optimization Research: A Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-21, May.
    11. Ben Zhang & Lei Ma & Zheng Liu, 2020. "Literature Trend Identification of Sustainable Technology Innovation: A Bibliometric Study Based on Co-Citation and Main Path Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-20, October.
    12. Fakudze, Sandile & Wei, Yingyuan & Shang, Qianqian & Ma, Ru & Li, Yueh-Heng & Chen, Jianqiang & Zhou, Peiguo & Han, Jiangang & Liu, Chengguo, 2021. "Single-pot upgrading of run-of-mine coal and rice straw via Taguchi-optimized hydrothermal treatment: Fuel properties and synergistic effects," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    13. Yu Wang & Ali Jalalian Daghigh, 2024. "Two Decades of Audiovisual Translation Studies: A Bibliometric Literature Review," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(3), pages 21582440241, September.
    14. Jianrong Yao & Xiangliang Guo & Lu Wang & Hui Jiang, 2022. "Understanding Green Consumption: A Literature Review Based on Factor Analysis and Bibliometric Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-13, July.
    15. Ramchandra Bhandari & Benjamin Eduardo Arce & Vittorio Sessa & Rabani Adamou, 2021. "Sustainability Assessment of Electricity Generation in Niger Using a Weighted Multi-Criteria Decision Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-25, January.
    16. Kumar, Pankaj & Kumar, Vinod & Singh, Jogendra & Kumar, Piyush, 2021. "Electrokinetic assisted anaerobic digestion of spent mushroom substrate supplemented with sugar mill wastewater for enhanced biogas production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 418-426.
    17. Raghu Raman & Ricardo Vinuesa & Prema Nedungadi, 2021. "Bibliometric Analysis of SARS, MERS, and COVID-19 Studies from India and Connection to Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-20, July.
    18. Yunlong Niu & Mastura Adam & Hazreena Hussein, 2022. "Connecting Urban Green Spaces with Children: A Scientometric Analysis Using CiteSpace," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-23, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zheng, Lei & Cheng, Shikun & Han, Yanzhao & Wang, Min & Xiang, Yue & Guo, Jiali & Cai, Di & Mang, Heinz-Peter & Dong, Taili & Li, Zifu & Yan, Zhengxu & Men, Yu, 2020. "Bio-natural gas industry in China: Current status and development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    2. Susanne Theuerl & Christiane Herrmann & Monika Heiermann & Philipp Grundmann & Niels Landwehr & Ulrich Kreidenweis & Annette Prochnow, 2019. "The Future Agricultural Biogas Plant in Germany: A Vision," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-32, January.
    3. Xue, Shengrong & Song, Jinghui & Wang, Xiaojiao & Shang, Zezhou & Sheng, Chenjing & Li, Chongyuan & Zhu, Yufan & Liu, Jingyu, 2020. "A systematic comparison of biogas development and related policies between China and Europe and corresponding insights," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    4. Luo, Tao & Khoshnevisan, Benyamin & Huang, Ruyi & Chen, Qiu & Mei, Zili & Pan, Junting & Liu, Hongbin, 2020. "Analysis of revolution in decentralized biogas facilities caused by transition in Chinese rural areas," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    5. Park, Min-Ju & Kim, Hak-Min & Gu, Yun-Jeong & Jeong, Dae-Woon, 2023. "Optimization of biogas-reforming conditions considering carbon formation, hydrogen production, and energy efficiencies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    6. Alberto Benato & Alarico Macor, 2019. "Italian Biogas Plants: Trend, Subsidies, Cost, Biogas Composition and Engine Emissions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-31, March.
    7. Alessandro Casasso & Marta Puleo & Deborah Panepinto & Mariachiara Zanetti, 2021. "Economic Viability and Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Budget of the Biomethane Retrofit of Manure-Operated Biogas Plants: A Case Study from Piedmont, Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-18, July.
    8. Wang, Xuemei & Yan, Rui & Zhao, Yuying & Cheng, Shikun & Han, Yanzhao & Yang, Shuo & Cai, Di & Mang, Heinz-Peter & Li, Zifu, 2020. "Biogas standard system in China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 1265-1273.
    9. Xueqing Yang & Yang Liu & Mei Wang & Alberto Bezama & Daniela Thrän, 2021. "Identifying the Necessities of Regional-Based Analysis to Study Germany’s Biogas Production Development under Energy Transition," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-20, February.
    10. Erika Winquist & Michiel Van Galen & Simon Zielonka & Pasi Rikkonen & Diti Oudendag & Lijun Zhou & Auke Greijdanus, 2021. "Expert Views on the Future Development of Biogas Business Branch in Germany, The Netherlands, and Finland until 2030," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-20, January.
    11. Zhang, Lihui & Wang, Jianing & Li, Songrui, 2022. "Regional suitability analysis of the rural biogas power generation industry:A case of China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 293-306.
    12. Schlund, David & Schönfisch, Max, 2021. "Analysing the impact of a renewable hydrogen quota on the European electricity and natural gas markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    13. Wu, Di & Li, Lei & Peng, Yun & Yang, Pingjin & Peng, Xuya & Sun, Yongming & Wang, Xiaoming, 2021. "State indicators of anaerobic digestion: A critical review on process monitoring and diagnosis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    14. D'Adamo, Idiano & Falcone, Pasquale Marcello & Gastaldi, Massimo & Morone, Piergiuseppe, 2020. "RES-T trajectories and an integrated SWOT-AHP analysis for biomethane. Policy implications to support a green revolution in European transport," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    15. Şenol, Halil & Ali Dereli̇, Mehmet & Özbilgin, Ferdi, 2021. "Investigation of the distribution of bovine manure-based biomethane potential using an artificial neural network in Turkey to 2030," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    16. Wakeel, Muhammad & Hayat, Tasawer & Shah, Noor Samad & Iqbal, Jibran & Haq Khan, Zia Ul & Shah, Ghulam Mustafa & Rasool, Atta, 2023. "Biogas Energy Resources in Pakistan Status, Potential, and Barriers," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    17. Valenti, Francesca & Selvaggi, Roberta & Pecorino, Biagio & Porto, Simona MC., 2023. "Bioeconomy for sustainable development of biomethane sector: Potential and challenges for agro-industrial by-products," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    18. Lei Zheng & Jingang Chen & Mingyue Zhao & Shikun Cheng & Li-Pang Wang & Heinz-Peter Mang & Zifu Li, 2020. "What Could China Give to and Take from Other Countries in Terms of the Development of the Biogas Industry?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, February.
    19. Tjutju, N.A.S. & Ammenberg, J. & Lindfors, A., 2024. "Biogas potential studies: A review of their scope, approach, and relevance," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    20. Hamelin, Lorie & Møller, Henrik Bjarne & Jørgensen, Uffe, 2021. "Harnessing the full potential of biomethane towards tomorrow's bioeconomy: A national case study coupling sustainable agricultural intensification, emerging biogas technologies and energy system analy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:3:p:812-:d:311862. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.