IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i2p643-d309118.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Indoor Environmental Quality in Latin American Buildings: A Systematic Literature Review

Author

Listed:
  • Claudia Valderrama-Ulloa

    (School of Civil Construction, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Av. Libertador Bernardo O’Higgins 340, 8331150 Santiago, Chile)

  • Lorena Silva-Castillo

    (School of Civil Construction, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Av. Libertador Bernardo O’Higgins 340, 8331150 Santiago, Chile)

  • Catalina Sandoval-Grandi

    (School of Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Av. Libertador Bernardo O’Higgins 340, 8331150 Santiago, Chile)

  • Carlos Robles-Calderon

    (School of Civil Construction, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Av. Libertador Bernardo O’Higgins 340, 8331150 Santiago, Chile)

  • Fabien Rouault

    (School of Civil Construction, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Av. Libertador Bernardo O’Higgins 340, 8331150 Santiago, Chile)

Abstract

The amount of time people spend inside buildings is significant. Indoor environment quality deficiencies in some of these buildings may affect the health of its users. Therefore, a systematic literature review has been conducted to assess the quality of indoor environments in existing buildings in Latin America. The objectives of this review are (1) identifying countries and building types whose indoor environment quality has been analyzed the most, (2) identifying most used evaluation strategies, (3) identifying comfort types and most evaluated variables, and (4) determining whether or not Latin American buildings are comfortable and what local factors contribute to that effect. From the 100 selected papers for this analysis, it was noted that Brazil and Argentina led the studies on residences and schools. It was also noted that hygrothermal comfort was the most analyzed comfort type, with temperature and humidity leading the number of studies. Finally, this review shows a lack of studies including buildings whose users are sensitive to indoor environmental quality, such as nurseries, senior homes, or health facilities. Additionally, there is a sustained discrepancy between objective measuring methods and user perception. Furthermore, a detailed analysis of 88 buildings shows that in Latin America, 67.5% of buildings are uncomfortable; thus, it is necessary to improve the designs and regulatory standards, to educate users, and to improve building monitoring management at the operational stage.

Suggested Citation

  • Claudia Valderrama-Ulloa & Lorena Silva-Castillo & Catalina Sandoval-Grandi & Carlos Robles-Calderon & Fabien Rouault, 2020. "Indoor Environmental Quality in Latin American Buildings: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-19, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:2:p:643-:d:309118
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/2/643/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/2/643/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Taleghani, Mohammad & Tenpierik, Martin & Kurvers, Stanley & van den Dobbelsteen, Andy, 2013. "A review into thermal comfort in buildings," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 201-215.
    2. Martínez-Molina, Antonio & Tort-Ausina, Isabel & Cho, Soolyeon & Vivancos, José-Luis, 2016. "Energy efficiency and thermal comfort in historic buildings: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 70-85.
    3. Filippín, C. & Flores Larsen, S., 2012. "Summer thermal behaviour of compact single family housing in a temperate climate in Argentina," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 3439-3455.
    4. Zomorodian, Zahra Sadat & Tahsildoost, Mohammad & Hafezi, Mohammadreza, 2016. "Thermal comfort in educational buildings: A review article," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 895-906.
    5. David Moher & Alessandro Liberati & Jennifer Tetzlaff & Douglas G Altman & The PRISMA Group, 2009. "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(7), pages 1-6, July.
    6. Francesco Fassio & Aldo Fanchiotti & Roberto De Lieto Vollaro, 2014. "Linear, Non-Linear and Alternative Algorithms in the Correlation of IEQ Factors with Global Comfort: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(11), pages 1-15, November.
    7. Krüger, E.L. & Laroca, C., 2010. "Thermal performance evaluation of a low-cost housing prototype made with plywood panels in Southern Brazil," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(2), pages 661-672, February.
    8. Djongyang, Noël & Tchinda, René & Njomo, Donatien, 2010. "Thermal comfort: A review paper," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(9), pages 2626-2640, December.
    9. Filippín, C. & Larsen, S. Flores & Mercado, V., 2011. "Winter energy behaviour in multi-family block buildings in a temperate-cold climate in Argentina," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 203-219, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ana Angelita Costa Neves da Rocha & Juan Lucas Nachez, 2023. "School Space and Sustainability in the Tropics: The Case of Thermal Comfort in Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-12, September.
    2. Pablo Alberto Sáinz-Ruiz & Javier Sanz-Valero & Vicente Gea-Caballero & Pedro Melo & Tam H. Nguyen & Juan Daniel Suárez-Máximo & José Ramón Martínez-Riera, 2021. "Dimensions of Community Assets for Health. A Systematised Review and Meta-Synthesis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-20, May.
    3. Esperanza García López & Christopher Heard, 2023. "Social Acceptance of a Thermal Architectural Implementation Proposal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-17, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Enescu, Diana, 2017. "A review of thermal comfort models and indicators for indoor environments," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 1353-1379.
    2. Michał Piasecki & Małgorzata Fedorczak-Cisak & Marcin Furtak & Jacek Biskupski, 2019. "Experimental Confirmation of the Reliability of Fanger’s Thermal Comfort Model—Case Study of a Near-Zero Energy Building (NZEB) Office Building," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-25, April.
    3. Van Craenendonck, Stijn & Lauriks, Leen & Vuye, Cedric & Kampen, Jarl, 2018. "A review of human thermal comfort experiments in controlled and semi-controlled environments," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 3365-3378.
    4. Paulína Šujanová & Monika Rychtáriková & Tiago Sotto Mayor & Affan Hyder, 2019. "A Healthy, Energy-Efficient and Comfortable Indoor Environment, a Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-37, April.
    5. Ribeiro, Thatiana Jessica da Silva & Mady, Carlos Eduardo Keutenedjian, 2022. "Comparison among exergy analysis methods applied to a human body thermal model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PE).
    6. Djamila, Harimi, 2017. "Indoor thermal comfort predictions: Selected issues and trends," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 569-580.
    7. Taleghani, Mohammad & Tenpierik, Martin & van den Dobbelsteen, Andy, 2014. "Energy performance and thermal comfort of courtyard/atrium dwellings in the Netherlands in the light of climate change," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 486-497.
    8. Azar, Elie & Nikolopoulou, Christina & Papadopoulos, Sokratis, 2016. "Integrating and optimizing metrics of sustainable building performance using human-focused agent-based modeling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 926-937.
    9. Abad, B. & Borca-Tasciuc, D.-A. & Martin-Gonzalez, M.S., 2017. "Non-contact methods for thermal properties measurement," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 1348-1370.
    10. Hugo Valdés & Christian Correa & Felipe Mellado, 2018. "Proposed Model of Sustainable Construction Skills for Engineers in Chile," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-19, August.
    11. Croitoru, Cristiana & Nastase, Ilinca & Bode, Florin & Meslem, Amina & Dogeanu, Angel, 2015. "Thermal comfort models for indoor spaces and vehicles—Current capabilities and future perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 304-318.
    12. Chong Peng & Chu Li & Zuyu Zou & Suwan Shen & Dongqi Sun, 2015. "Improvement of Air Quality and Thermal Environment in an Old City District by Constructing Wind Passages," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-21, September.
    13. Wonyoung Yang & Hyeun Jun Moon & Jin Yong Jeon, 2019. "Comparison of Response Scales as Measures of Indoor Environmental Perception in Combined Thermal and Acoustic Conditions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-26, July.
    14. Ajabli, Houda & Zoubir, Amine & Elotmani, Rabie & Louzazni, Mohamed & Kandoussi, Khalid & Daya, Abdelmajid, 2023. "Review on Eco-friendly insulation material used for indoor comfort in building," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    15. Yang, Liu & Yan, Haiyan & Lam, Joseph C., 2014. "Thermal comfort and building energy consumption implications – A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 164-173.
    16. Charani Shandiz, Saeid & Rismanchi, Behzad & Foliente, Greg, 2021. "Energy master planning for net-zero emission communities: State of the art and research challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    17. Mardani, Abbas & Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras & Streimikiene, Dalia & Jusoh, Ahmad & Khoshnoudi, Masoumeh, 2017. "A comprehensive review of data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach in energy efficiency," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 1298-1322.
    18. Milen Balbis-Morejón & Javier M. Rey-Hernández & Carlos Amaris-Castilla & Eloy Velasco-Gómez & Julio F. San José-Alonso & Francisco Javier Rey-Martínez, 2020. "Experimental Study and Analysis of Thermal Comfort in a University Campus Building in Tropical Climate," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-18, October.
    19. İlkay Unay-Gailhard & Mark A. Brennen, 2022. "How digital communications contribute to shaping the career paths of youth: a review study focused on farming as a career option," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(4), pages 1491-1508, December.
    20. Mahin Ghafari & Vali Baigi & Zahra Cheraghi & Amin Doosti-Irani, 2016. "The Prevalence of Asymptomatic Bacteriuria in Iranian Pregnant Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(6), pages 1-10, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:2:p:643-:d:309118. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.