IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i2p617-d308667.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable Urban Community Development: A Case Study from the Perspective of Self-Governance and Public Participation

Author

Listed:
  • Yang Fu

    (Department of Public Administration, College of Management, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, Guangdong, China)

  • Weihong Ma

    (Department of Public Administration, College of Management, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, Guangdong, China)

Abstract

(1) Background: There is a global trend to stimulate sustainable urbanization by updating the hardware of the built environment with green technologies. However, simply greening the city hardware does not ensure a sustainable urban system. In reality, urban communities, as cells of the city, play a crucial role in the sustainable development of the entire city. (2) Methods: This paper conducts a case study by investigating a community in Taipei with semi-structured interviews and other first-hand data. It examines how self-organization, voluntary groups, and the public participation of community members has successfully institutionalized a governing system for the sustainable development of communities; (3) Results: This paper identifies the major actors and mechanisms underpinning the sustainable development of urban communities with a case study in Taipei. The establishment of this more cost-effective form of community governance will possibly provide more benefits to community members; (4) Conclusions: This case study will shed light on the sustainable development of urban community in many other cities, offering possible pathways and epitome for self-organization of urban community in the coming era. Its cost-effective institutional design contributes greatly to sustainable community development, partly solving the current failure to promote urban sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang Fu & Weihong Ma, 2020. "Sustainable Urban Community Development: A Case Study from the Perspective of Self-Governance and Public Participation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-15, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:2:p:617-:d:308667
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/2/617/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/2/617/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vatn, Arild, 2010. "An institutional analysis of payments for environmental services," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(6), pages 1245-1252, April.
    2. Samuel Bowles & Herbert Gintis, 2002. "Social Capital and Community Governance," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 112(483), pages 419-436, November.
    3. Ostrom,Elinor, 2015. "Governing the Commons," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107569782, October.
    4. Nico Schulenkorf, 2012. "Sustainable community development through sport and events: A conceptual framework for Sport-for-Development projects," Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, January.
    5. Schulenkorf, Nico, 2012. "Sustainable community development through sport and events: A conceptual framework for Sport-for-Development projects," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12.
    6. E. Ostrom, 2010. "A Behavioral Approach to the Rational Choice Theory of Collective Action Presidential Address, American political Science Association, 1997," Public administration issues, Higher School of Economics, issue 1, pages 5-52.
    7. Farmer, Jane & Currie, Margaret & Kenny, Amanda & Munoz, Sarah-Anne, 2015. "An exploration of the longer-term impacts of community participation in rural health services design," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 64-71.
    8. Pamela A. Mischen & George C. Homsy & Carl P. Lipo & Robert Holahan & Valerie Imbruce & Andreas Pape & Weixing Zhu & Joseph Graney & Ziang Zhang & Louisa M. Holmes & Manuel Reina, 2019. "A Foundation for Measuring Community Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-16, March.
    9. O'Toole, Kevin & Dennis, Jennifer & Kilpatrick, Sue & Farmer, Jane, 2010. "From passive welfare to community governance: Youth NGOs in Australia and Scotland," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 430-436, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ungku Norani Sonet & Mustafa Klufallah & Michael D. Peters & Timothy J. Dixon, 2021. "Indicators of the Public Participation Exercise for Designing Public Parks in Malaysia: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-14, November.
    2. Dong, Feng & Li, Yangfan & Li, Kun & Zhu, Jiao & Zheng, Lu, 2022. "Can smart city construction improve urban ecological total factor energy efficiency in China? Fresh evidence from generalized synthetic control method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    3. Kexi Xu & Hui Gao & Haijun Bao & Fan Zhou & Jieyu Su, 2021. "Sustainable Transformation of Resettled Communities for Landless Peasants: Generation Logic of Spatial Conflicts," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-17, November.
    4. Batara Surya & Seri Suriani & Firman Menne & Herminawaty Abubakar & Muhammad Idris & Emil Salim Rasyidi & Hasanuddin Remmang, 2021. "Community Empowerment and Utilization of Renewable Energy: Entrepreneurial Perspective for Community Resilience Based on Sustainable Management of Slum Settlements in Makassar City, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-36, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rui Augusto da Costa & Ines Moleiro & Maria Fernanda Brasete, 2022. "Sports Tourism and High-Performance Centres in the Portugal Central Region," Academica Turistica - Tourism and Innovation Journal, University of Primorska Press, vol. 15(1), pages 111-121.
    2. Harris, Kevin & Adams, Andrew, 2016. "Power and discourse in the politics of evidence in sport for development," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 97-106.
    3. Matthew Walker & Stephen Hills & Bob Heere, 2017. "Evaluating a Socially Responsible Employment Program: Beneficiary Impacts and Stakeholder Perceptions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 143(1), pages 53-70, June.
    4. Richter, Andries & Grasman, Johan, 2013. "The transmission of sustainable harvesting norms when agents are conditionally cooperative," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 202-209.
    5. Louis Moustakas & Lisa Kalina, 2022. "Learning Football for Good: The Development and Evaluation of the Football3 MOOC," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-15, February.
    6. Chiara D'Angelo & Chiara Corvino & Eloisa Cianci & Caterina Gozzoli, 2020. "Sport for Vulnerable Youth: The Role of Multi-Professional Groups in Sustaining Intersectoral Collaboration," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(3), pages 129-138.
    7. Jones, Gareth J. & Edwards, Michael B. & Bocarro, Jason N. & Bunds, Kyle S. & Smith, Jordan W., 2018. "Leveraging community sport organizations to promote community capacity: Strategic outcomes, challenges, and theoretical considerations," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 279-292.
    8. LeCrom, Carrie W. & Martin, Tiesha & Dwyer, Brendan & Greenhalgh, Greg, 2019. "The role of management in achieving health outcomes in SFD programmes: A stakeholder perspective," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 53-67.
    9. Hoekman, Michael J. & Schulenkorf, Nico & Welty Peachey, Jon, 2019. "Re-engaging local youth for sustainable sport-for-development," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(5), pages 613-625.
    10. Ji Wu & Madeleine Orr & Kurumi Aizawa & Yuhei Inoue, 2021. "Language Relativity in Legacy Literature: A Systematic Review in Multiple Languages," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-18, October.
    11. Shaoxiong Yang & Jinfu Xu & Ruoyu Yang, 2020. "Research on Coordination and Driving Factors of Sports Industry and Regional Sustainable Development—Empirical Research Based on Panel Data of Provinces and Cities in Eastern China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-21, January.
    12. Seung Pil Lee, 2020. "Sustainable Reciprocity Mechanism of Social Initiatives in Sport: The Mediating Effect of Gratitude," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-18, November.
    13. Reis, Arianne C. & Vieira, Marcelo Carvalho & Sousa-Mast, Fabiana Rodrigues de, 2016. "“Sport for Development” in developing countries: The case of the Vilas Olímpicas do Rio de Janeiro," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 107-119.
    14. Authelet, Manon & Subervie, Julie & Meyfroidt, Patrick & Asquith, Nigel & Ezzine-de-Blas, Driss, 2021. "Economic, pro-social and pro-environmental factors influencing participation in an incentive-based conservation program in Bolivia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    15. Yanez-Pagans, Patricia, 2013. "Cash for Cooperation? Payments for Ecosystem Services and Common Property Management in Mexico," 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C. 151294, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    16. Kang, Seungmin & Svensson, Per G., 2019. "Shared leadership in sport for development and peace: A conceptual framework of antecedents and outcomes," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 464-476.
    17. Richter, Andries & van Soest, Daan & Grasman, Johan, 2013. "Contagious cooperation, temptation, and ecosystem collapse," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 141-158.
    18. Welty Peachey, Jon & Schulenkorf, Nico & Hill, Patrick, 2020. "Sport-for-development: A comprehensive analysis of theoretical and conceptual advancements," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(5), pages 783-796.
    19. Ansink, Erik & Tesfaye, Abonesh & Bouma, Jetske & Brouwer, Roy, 2017. "Cooperation in watershed management: A field experiment on location, trust, and enforcement," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 91-104.
    20. Vollan, Björn, 2012. "Pitfalls of Externally Initiated Collective Action: A Case Study from South Africa," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 758-770.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:2:p:617-:d:308667. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.