IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i23p10053-d454819.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Genetic Algorithm for Energy Commitment in a Power System Supplied by Multiple Energy Carriers

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammad Dehghani

    (Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Shiraz University of Technology, Shiraz 71557-13876, Iran)

  • Mohammad Mardaneh

    (Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Shiraz University of Technology, Shiraz 71557-13876, Iran)

  • Om P. Malik

    (Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada)

  • Josep M. Guerrero

    (Department of Energy Technology, Center for Research on Microgrids, Aalborg University, 9220 Aalborg, Denmark)

  • Carlos Sotelo

    (Tecnologico de Monterrey, School of Engineering and Sciences, Monterrey N.L. 64849, Mexico)

  • David Sotelo

    (Tecnologico de Monterrey, School of Engineering and Sciences, Monterrey N.L. 64849, Mexico)

  • Morteza Nazari-Heris

    (104 Engineering Unit A, Department of Architectural Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA 16802, USA)

  • Kamal Al-Haddad

    (École de Technologie Supérieure, University of Quebec, Montreal, QC H3C 3P8, Canada)

  • Ricardo A. Ramirez-Mendoza

    (Tecnologico de Monterrey, School of Engineering and Sciences, Monterrey N.L. 64849, Mexico)

Abstract

In recent years, energy consumption has notably been increasing. This poses a challenge to the power grid operators due to the management and control of the energy supply and consumption. Here, energy commitment is an index criterion useful to specify the quality level and the development of human life. Henceforth, continuity of long-term access to resources and energy delivery requires an appropriate methodology that must consider energy scheduling such as an economic and strategic priority, in which primary energy carriers play an important role. The integrated energy networks such as power and gas systems lead the possibility to minimize the operating costs; this is based on the conversion of energy from one form to another and considering the starting energy in various types. Therefore, the studies toward multi-carrier energy systems are growing up taking into account the interconnection among various energy carriers and the penetration of energy storage technologies in such systems. In this paper, using dynamic programming and genetic algorithm, the energy commitment of an energy network that includes gas and electrical energy is carried out. The studied multi-carrier energy system has considered defending parties including transportation, industrial and agriculture sectors, residential, commercial, and industrial consumers. The proposed study is mathematically modeled and implemented on an energy grid with four power plants and different energy consumption sectors for a 24-h energy study period. In this simulation, an appropriate pattern of using energy carriers to supply energy demand is determined. Simulation results and analysis show that energy carriers can be used efficiently using the proposed energy commitment method.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammad Dehghani & Mohammad Mardaneh & Om P. Malik & Josep M. Guerrero & Carlos Sotelo & David Sotelo & Morteza Nazari-Heris & Kamal Al-Haddad & Ricardo A. Ramirez-Mendoza, 2020. "Genetic Algorithm for Energy Commitment in a Power System Supplied by Multiple Energy Carriers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-23, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:23:p:10053-:d:454819
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/23/10053/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/23/10053/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hobbs, Benjamin F. & Centolella, Paul, 1995. "Environmental policies and their effects on utility planning and operations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 255-271.
    2. Wang, Yongli & Wang, Yudong & Huang, Yujing & Li, Fang & Zeng, Ming & Li, Jiapu & Wang, Xiaohai & Zhang, Fuwei, 2019. "Planning and operation method of the regional integrated energy system considering economy and environment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 731-750.
    3. Yu Huang & Kai Yang & Weiting Zhang & Kwang Y. Lee, 2018. "Hierarchical Energy Management for the MultiEnergy Carriers System with Different Interest Bodies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-18, October.
    4. Cormio, C. & Dicorato, M. & Minoia, A. & Trovato, M., 2003. "A regional energy planning methodology including renewable energy sources and environmental constraints," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 7(2), pages 99-130, April.
    5. Nolberto Munier & Eloy Hontoria & Fernando Jiménez-Sáez, 2019. "Strategic Approach in Multi-Criteria Decision Making," International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Springer, number 978-3-030-02726-1, December.
    6. Prina, Matteo Giacomo & Lionetti, Matteo & Manzolini, Giampaolo & Sparber, Wolfram & Moser, David, 2019. "Transition pathways optimization methodology through EnergyPLAN software for long-term energy planning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 356-368.
    7. Ridjan, Iva & Mathiesen, Brian Vad & Connolly, David & Duić, Neven, 2013. "The feasibility of synthetic fuels in renewable energy systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 76-84.
    8. Yang, Ming, 2006. "Demand side management in Nepal," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(14), pages 2677-2698.
    9. Carvallo, Juan Pablo & Larsen, Peter H. & Sanstad, Alan H. & Goldman, Charles A., 2018. "Long term load forecasting accuracy in electric utility integrated resource planning," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 410-422.
    10. Barbir, Frano, 2009. "Transition to renewable energy systems with hydrogen as an energy carrier," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 308-312.
    11. Morteza Nazari-Heris & Behnam Mohammadi-Ivatloo & Somayeh Asadi, 2020. "Optimal Operation of Multi-Carrier Energy Networks Considering Uncertain Parameters and Thermal Energy Storage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-20, June.
    12. Atikol, Uğur, 2004. "A demand-side planning approach for the commercial sector of developing countries," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 257-266.
    13. Jiashen Teh & Ching-Ming Lai & Yu-Huei Cheng, 2018. "Improving the Penetration of Wind Power with Dynamic Thermal Rating System, Static VAR Compensator and Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-16, April.
    14. Kyu-Hyung Jo & Mun-Kyeom Kim, 2018. "Improved Genetic Algorithm-Based Unit Commitment Considering Uncertainty Integration Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-18, May.
    15. Jianfeng Li & Dongxiao Niu & Ming Wu & Yongli Wang & Fang Li & Huanran Dong, 2018. "Research on Battery Energy Storage as Backup Power in the Operation Optimization of a Regional Integrated Energy System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-20, November.
    16. Hoog, David T. & Hobbs, Benjamin F., 1993. "An Integrated Resource Planning model considering customer value, emissions, and regional economic impacts," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 18(11), pages 1153-1160.
    17. Nolberto Munier & Eloy Hontoria & Fernando Jiménez-Sáez, 2019. "Linear Programming Fundamentals," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Strategic Approach in Multi-Criteria Decision Making, chapter 0, pages 101-116, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ghareeb Moustafa & Ali M. El-Rifaie & Idris H. Smaili & Ahmed Ginidi & Abdullah M. Shaheen & Ahmed F. Youssef & Mohamed A. Tolba, 2023. "An Enhanced Dwarf Mongoose Optimization Algorithm for Solving Engineering Problems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-26, July.
    2. Mohamed Derbeli & Cristian Napole & Oscar Barambones & Jesus Sanchez & Isidro Calvo & Pablo Fernández-Bustamante, 2021. "Maximum Power Point Tracking Techniques for Photovoltaic Panel: A Review and Experimental Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-31, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Østergaard, P.A. & Lund, H. & Thellufsen, J.Z. & Sorknæs, P. & Mathiesen, B.V., 2022. "Review and validation of EnergyPLAN," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    2. De Jonghe, C. & Hobbs, B. F. & Belmans, R., 2011. "Integrating short-term demand response into long-term investment planning," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1132, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    3. Trifunovic, J. & Mikulovic, J. & Djurisic, Z. & Djuric, M. & Kostic, M., 2009. "Reductions in electricity consumption and power demand in case of the mass use of compact fluorescent lamps," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(9), pages 1355-1363.
    4. Malik, Arif S., 2007. "Impact on power planning due to demand-side management (DSM) in commercial and government sectors with rebound effect—A case study of central grid of Oman," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(11), pages 2157-2166.
    5. David Maya-Drysdale & Louise Krog Jensen & Brian Vad Mathiesen, 2020. "Energy Vision Strategies for the EU Green New Deal: A Case Study of European Cities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, May.
    6. Nhan Thanh Nguyen & Minh Ha-Duong, 2009. "The potential for mitigation of CO2 emissions in Vietnam's power sector," Post-Print halshs-00441085, HAL.
    7. Dzene, Ilze & Rošā, Marika & Blumberga, Dagnija, 2011. "How to select appropriate measures for reductions in negative environmental impact? Testing a screening method on a regional energy system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 1878-1883.
    8. Carvallo, Juan Pablo & Sanstad, Alan H. & Larsen, Peter H., 2019. "Exploring the relationship between planning and procurement in western U.S. electric utilities," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 4-15.
    9. Yongjie Zhong & Hongwei Zhou & Xuanjun Zong & Zhou Xu & Yonghui Sun, 2019. "Hierarchical Multi-Objective Fuzzy Collaborative Optimization of Integrated Energy System under Off-Design Performance," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-27, March.
    10. Després, Jacques & Hadjsaid, Nouredine & Criqui, Patrick & Noirot, Isabelle, 2015. "Modelling the impacts of variable renewable sources on the power sector: Reconsidering the typology of energy modelling tools," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 486-495.
    11. Selin Kocaman, Ayse & Abad, Carlos & Troy, Tara J. & Tim Huh, Woonghee & Modi, Vijay, 2016. "A stochastic model for a macroscale hybrid renewable energy system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 688-703.
    12. Shouman, Enas R. & El Shenawy, E.T. & Khattab, N.M., 2016. "Market financial analysis and cost performance for photovoltaic technology through international and national perspective with case study for Egypt," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 540-549.
    13. Koo, Jamin & Park, Kyungtae & Shin, Dongil & Yoon, En Sup, 2011. "Economic evaluation of renewable energy systems under varying scenarios and its implications to Korea's renewable energy plan," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(6), pages 2254-2260, June.
    14. Yang, Ming & Dixon, Robert K., 2012. "Investing in efficient industrial boiler systems in China and Vietnam," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 432-437.
    15. Liu, Qian & Li, Wanjun & Zhao, Zhen & Jian, Gan, 2024. "Optimal operation of coordinated multi-carrier energy hubs for integrated electricity and gas networks," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    16. Luo, Yu & Shi, Yixiang & Li, Wenying & Cai, Ningsheng, 2014. "Comprehensive modeling of tubular solid oxide electrolysis cell for co-electrolysis of steam and carbon dioxide," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 420-434.
    17. Stephan Kigle & Michael Ebner & Andrej Guminski, 2022. "Greenhouse Gas Abatement in EUROPE—A Scenario-Based, Bottom-Up Analysis Showing the Effect of Deep Emission Mitigation on the European Energy System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-18, February.
    18. Luis Montero & Antonio Bello & Javier Reneses, 2022. "A Review on the Unit Commitment Problem: Approaches, Techniques, and Resolution Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-40, February.
    19. Tommaso Ortalli & Andrea Di Martino & Michela Longo & Dario Zaninelli, 2024. "Make-or-Buy Policy Decision in Maintenance Planning for Mobility: A Multi-Criteria Approach," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-18, May.
    20. Behnam Zakeri & Samuli Rinne & Sanna Syri, 2015. "Wind Integration into Energy Systems with a High Share of Nuclear Power—What Are the Compromises?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-35, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:23:p:10053-:d:454819. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.