IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i22p9702-d448477.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Opportunities and Limitations of Building Energy Performance Simulation Tools in the Early Stages of Building Design in the UK

Author

Listed:
  • Ramy Mahmoud

    (School of Architecture, Planning and Landscape, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK)

  • John M. Kamara

    (School of Architecture, Planning and Landscape, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK)

  • Neil Burford

    (School of Architecture, Planning and Landscape, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK)

Abstract

This research investigates the use of Building Energy Performance Simulation (BEPS) tools in the early stages of building design in UK architectural practices with a particular focus on the barriers and opportunities to their effective application and further uptake. Two primary methods of investigation were undertaken; the first was a wide survey among UK architects and architectural practices, where the responses of 418 participants were electronically gathered and analysed. A deeper understanding of the issues was developed through an analysis of the process of low-energy building design using semi-structured interviews with six representatives of well-established architectural practices in the UK. The findings reveal that while there is an increasing understanding of the importance of BEPS involvement at the early design stages, there was limited evidence of actual early implementation of BEPS tools other than a few well known but specialised tools such as Passive House Planning Package (PHPP) which were used mainly for domestic energy performance evaluation. However, many practices surveyed showed interest in achieving higher standards than the “basic” regulatory backstops, which has resulted in Passive House and BREEAM seeing increasing use in domestic and non-domestic projects respectively. Although there has been a significant increase in the development and availability of tools and methodologies for assessing building energy performance our study shows that the focus for future research needs to be shifted from the “tool development” to looking at methods of implementing and using such tools in practice at the early design stages.

Suggested Citation

  • Ramy Mahmoud & John M. Kamara & Neil Burford, 2020. "Opportunities and Limitations of Building Energy Performance Simulation Tools in the Early Stages of Building Design in the UK," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-29, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:22:p:9702-:d:448477
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/22/9702/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/22/9702/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tian, Wei & Heo, Yeonsook & de Wilde, Pieter & Li, Zhanyong & Yan, Da & Park, Cheol Soo & Feng, Xiaohang & Augenbroe, Godfried, 2018. "A review of uncertainty analysis in building energy assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 285-301.
    2. Tian Han & Qiong Huang & Anxiao Zhang & Qi Zhang, 2018. "Simulation-Based Decision Support Tools in the Early Design Stages of a Green Building—A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-23, October.
    3. Maria-Mar Fernandez-Antolin & José-Manuel del-Río & Fernando del Ama Gonzalo & Roberto-Alonso Gonzalez-Lezcano, 2020. "The Relationship between the Use of Building Performance Simulation Tools by Recent Graduate Architects and the Deficiencies in Architectural Education," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-20, March.
    4. Adrian Pitts, 2017. "Passive House and Low Energy Buildings: Barriers and Opportunities for Future Development within UK Practice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-26, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Łukasz Mazur & Anna Bać & Magdalena Daria Vaverková & Jan Winkler & Aleksandra Nowysz & Eugeniusz Koda, 2022. "Evaluation of the Quality of the Housing Environment Using Multi-Criteria Analysis That Includes Energy Efficiency: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-24, October.
    2. Säwén, Toivo & Sasic Kalagasidis, Angela & Hollberg, Alexander, 2024. "Critical perspectives on life cycle building performance assessment tool reviews," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    3. Ahsan Waqar & Idris Othman & Nasir Shafiq & Hasim Altan & Bertug Ozarisoy, 2023. "Modeling the Effect of Overcoming the Barriers to Passive Design Implementation on Project Sustainability Building Success: A Structural Equation Modeling Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-26, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhou, Yuekuan & Zheng, Siqian, 2020. "Uncertainty study on thermal and energy performances of a deterministic parameters based optimal aerogel glazing system using machine-learning method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    2. Rongrong Yu & Ning Gu & Michael J. Ostwald, 2022. "Architects’ Perceptions about Sustainable Design Practice and the Support Provided for This by Digital Tools: A Study in Australia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-18, October.
    3. Younghun Choi & Takuro Kobashi & Yoshiki Yamagata & Akito Murayama, 2021. "Assessment of waterfront office redevelopment plan on optimal building energy demand and rooftop photovoltaics for urban decarbonization," Papers 2108.09029, arXiv.org.
    4. Belen Moreno Santamaria & Fernando del Ama Gonzalo & Benito Lauret Aguirregabiria & Juan A. Hernandez Ramos, 2020. "Experimental Validation of Water Flow Glazing: Transient Response in Real Test Rooms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-24, July.
    5. Deb, C. & Gelder, L.V. & Spiekman, M. & Pandraud, Guillaume & Jack, R. & Fitton, R., 2021. "Measuring the heat transfer coefficient (HTC) in buildings: A stakeholder's survey," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    6. George M. Stavrakakis & Dimitris Al. Katsaprakakis & Markos Damasiotis, 2021. "Basic Principles, Most Common Computational Tools, and Capabilities for Building Energy and Urban Microclimate Simulations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-41, October.
    7. Ghada Elshafei & Silvia Vilcekova & Martina Zelenakova & Abdelazim M. Negm, 2021. "Towards an Adaptation of Efficient Passive Design for Thermal Comfort Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-23, August.
    8. Li, Sihui & Gong, Guangcai & Peng, Jinqing, 2019. "Dynamic coupling method between air-source heat pumps and buildings in China’s hot-summer/cold-winter zone," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    9. Lily Warren & Ayotunde Dawodu & Ayomikun Solomon Adewumi & Cheng Quan, 2024. "Can the UK Deliver Zero Carbon Ready Homes by 2050?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-25, July.
    10. Su, Ziyi & Li, Xiaofeng, 2022. "Extraction of key parameters and simplification of sub-system energy models using sensitivity analysis in subway stations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PA).
    11. Urbano, Eva M. & Martinez-Viol, Victor & Kampouropoulos, Konstantinos & Romeral, Luis, 2022. "Risk assessment of energy investment in the industrial framework – Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis for energy design and operation optimisation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PA).
    12. Zhang, Hu & Tian, Wei & Tan, Jingyuan & Yin, Juchao & Fu, Xing, 2024. "Sensitivity analysis of multiple time-scale building energy using Bayesian adaptive spline surfaces," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 363(C).
    13. Shan Dai & Wenfeng Bai & Jing Xiao, 2024. "Balancing Environmental Impact and Practicality: A Case Study on the Cement-Stabilized Rammed Earth Construction in Southeast Rural China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-18, October.
    14. Joohyun Lee & Mardelle McCuskey Shepley & Jungmann Choi, 2021. "Analysis of Professionals’ and the General Public’s Perceptions of Passive Houses in Korea: Needs Assessment for the Improvement of the Energy Efficiency and Indoor Environmental Quality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-20, August.
    15. Hamed Yassaghi & Simi Hoque, 2021. "Impact Assessment in the Process of Propagating Climate Change Uncertainties into Building Energy Use," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-27, January.
    16. Li, Hangxin & Wang, Shengwei, 2020. "Coordinated robust optimal design of building envelope and energy systems for zero/low energy buildings considering uncertainties," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    17. Hasim Altan & Bertug Ozarisoy, 2022. "An Analysis of the Development of Modular Building Design Elements to Improve Thermal Performance of a Representative High Rise Residential Estate in the Coastline City of Famagusta, Cyprus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-50, March.
    18. Singh, Manav Mahan & Singaravel, Sundaravelpandian & Geyer, Philipp, 2021. "Machine learning for early stage building energy prediction: Increment and enrichment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    19. Ahsan Waqar & Idris Othman & Nasir Shafiq & Hasim Altan & Bertug Ozarisoy, 2023. "Modeling the Effect of Overcoming the Barriers to Passive Design Implementation on Project Sustainability Building Success: A Structural Equation Modeling Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-26, June.
    20. Belen Moreno Santamaria & Fernando del Ama Gonzalo & Danielle Pinette & Roberto-Alonso Gonzalez-Lezcano & Benito Lauret Aguirregabiria & Juan A. Hernandez Ramos, 2020. "Application and Validation of a Dynamic Energy Simulation Tool: A Case Study with Water Flow Glazing Envelope," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-20, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:22:p:9702-:d:448477. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.