IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i1p355-d304356.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigating Critical Non-Value Adding Activities and Their Resulting Wastes in BIM-Based Project Delivery

Author

Listed:
  • Longhui Liao

    (Sino-Australia Joint Research Center in BIM and Smart Construction, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China)

  • Evelyn Ai Lin Teo

    (Department of Building, School of Design and Environment, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117566, Singapore)

  • Ruidong Chang

    (School of Architecture and Built Environment, The University of Adelaide, North Terrace, Adelaide 5005, Australia)

  • Linhui Li

    (Bank of China Limited Singapore Branch, Singapore 049908, Singapore)

Abstract

Building information modeling (BIM) is deemed a useful innovation for technological and sustainable development of the economy. It is partially used in building projects in Singapore, although its implementation is mandated by the local government, resulting in various wastes and suboptimal productivity. Little is known about how non-value adding (NVA) BIM implementation practices were perceived by the local practitioners and how these practices affected productivity in building projects in Singapore. This study aimed to identify critical NVA BIM implementation activities and investigate the criticality of their resulting wastes to productivity performance in the current project delivery process in Singapore. The results from a questionnaire survey of 73 experts and four post-survey interviews in Singapore revealed that 38 NVA BIM implementation activities were deemed critical, among which “lack of involvement by contractors to contribute site knowledge” in the design development phase was ranked top; the top five resulting wastes with highest criticalities were reworks/abortive works, requests for information, design deficiencies, defects, and waiting/idle time. Furthermore, an independent-samples t -test was conducted to examine whether construction firms and upfront stakeholders perceived the NVA activities differently. It was discovered that most NVA activities exerted more agreement from construction firms than upfront non-construction organizations. Six strategies were proposed to mitigate the NVA activities and wastes. The findings can help practitioners identify weak areas of their BIM implementation practices and prioritize resources accordingly to eliminate the wastes and foster sustainability, as well as help overseas project teams, with minor adjustments, customize their own NVA BIM implementation activities and management strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Longhui Liao & Evelyn Ai Lin Teo & Ruidong Chang & Linhui Li, 2020. "Investigating Critical Non-Value Adding Activities and Their Resulting Wastes in BIM-Based Project Delivery," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-20, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:1:p:355-:d:304356
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/1/355/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/1/355/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lei Zhang & Zhenwei Chu & Qing He & Peipei Zhai, 2019. "Investigating the Constraints to Buidling Information Modeling (BIM) Applications for Sustainable Building Projects: A Case of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-17, March.
    2. Amin Nikakhtar & Alireza Abbasian Hosseini & Kuan Yew Wong & Amir Zavichi, 2015. "Application of lean construction principles to reduce construction process waste using computer simulation: a case study," International Journal of Services and Operations Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 20(4), pages 461-480.
    3. Joosung Lee & Jaejun Kim, 2017. "BIM-Based 4D Simulation to Improve Module Manufacturing Productivity for Sustainable Building Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-23, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Longhui Liao & Evelyn Ai Lin Teo & Ruidong Chang & Xianbo Zhao, 2020. "Diffusion of Building Information Modeling in Building Projects and Firms in Singapore," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-23, September.
    2. Wei He & Wenjing Li & Wei Wang, 2021. "Developing a Resource Allocation Approach for Resource-Constrained Construction Operation under Multi-Objective Operation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-22, June.
    3. Hamidreza Khalesi & Amirhossein Balali & Alireza Valipour & Jurgita Antucheviciene & Darius Migilinskas & Viaceslav Zigmund, 2020. "Application of Hybrid SWARA–BIM in Reducing Reworks of Building Construction Projects from the Perspective of Time," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-20, October.
    4. Qurratulain Malik & Abdur Rehman Nasir & Rabiah Muhammad & Muhammad Jamaluddin Thaheem & Fahim Ullah & Khurram Iqbal Ahmad Khan & Muhammad Usman Hassan, 2021. "BIMp-Chart—A Global Decision Support System for Measuring BIM Implementation Level in Construction Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-25, August.
    5. Ki Pyung Kim & Rob Freda & Tan Hai Dang Nguyen, 2020. "Building Information Modelling Feasibility Study for Building Surveying," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-19, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zezhou Wu & Changhong Chen & Yuzhu Cai & Chen Lu & Hao Wang & Tao Yu, 2019. "BIM-Based Visualization Research in the Construction Industry: A Network Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-13, September.
    2. Yongliang Deng & Jinyun Li & Qiuting Wu & Shuangshuang Pei & Na Xu & Guodong Ni, 2020. "Using Network Theory to Explore BIM Application Barriers for BIM Sustainable Development in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-22, April.
    3. Shuvo Dip Datta & Bassam A. Tayeh & Ibrahim Y. Hakeem & Yazan I. Abu Aisheh, 2023. "Benefits and Barriers of Implementing Building Information Modeling Techniques for Sustainable Practices in the Construction Industry—A Comprehensive Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-28, August.
    4. Jan Růžička & Jakub Veselka & Zdeněk Rudovský & Stanislav Vitásek & Petr Hájek, 2022. "BIM and Automation in Complex Building Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-20, February.
    5. Yu Cao & Liyan Huang & Nur Mardhiyah Aziz & Syahrul Nizam Kamaruzzaman, 2022. "Building Information Modelling (BIM) Capabilities in the Design and Planning of Rural Settlements in China: A Systematic Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-34, October.
    6. Isabel Jordan-Palomar & Patricia Tzortzopoulos & Jorge García-Valldecabres & Eugenio Pellicer, 2018. "Protocol to Manage Heritage-Building Interventions Using Heritage Building Information Modelling (HBIM)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-19, March.
    7. Xueying Wu & Wenyi Zhao & Tianshan Ma & Ziyu Yang, 2019. "Improving the Efficiency of Highway Construction Project Management Using Lean Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-27, July.
    8. Yanqiu Cui & Simeng Li & Chunlu Liu & Ninghan Sun, 2020. "Creation and Diversified Applications of Plane Module Libraries for Prefabricated Houses Based on BIM," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-17, January.
    9. Ahsan Waqar & Abdul Hannan Qureshi & Wesam Salah Alaloul, 2023. "Barriers to Building Information Modeling (BIM) Deployment in Small Construction Projects: Malaysian Construction Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-30, January.
    10. Boateng Ali, 2019. "Supply chain management and lean concept in construction: a case of Ghanaian building construction industry," Organization, Technology and Management in Construction, Sciendo, vol. 11(1), pages 2034-2043, January.
    11. Li, Shuquan & Wu, Xiuyu & Zhou, Yuan & Liu, Xin, 2017. "A study on the evaluation of implementation level of lean construction in two Chinese firms," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 846-851.
    12. Abdullah Alghuried, 2023. "Measuring the Benefits and Barriers of the Implementation of BIM in Sustainable Practice in the Construction Industry of Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-26, September.
    13. Wael Alattyih & Husnain Haider & Halim Boussabaine, 2019. "Development of Value Creation Drivers for Sustainable Design of Green Buildings in Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-33, October.
    14. Younès Dagdougui & Ahmed Ouammi & Rachid Benchrifa, 2020. "Energy Management-Based Predictive Controller for a Smart Building Powered by Renewable Energy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-18, May.
    15. Woong-Gi Kim & Namhyuk Ham & Jae-Jun Kim, 2021. "Enhanced Subcontractors Allocation for Apartment Construction Project Applying Conceptual 4D Digital Twin Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-21, October.
    16. Myungdo Lee & Dongmin Lee & Taehoon Kim & Ung-Kyun Lee, 2020. "Practical Analysis of BIM Tasks for Modular Construction Projects in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-16, August.
    17. Ki Pyung Kim & Rob Freda & Tan Hai Dang Nguyen, 2020. "Building Information Modelling Feasibility Study for Building Surveying," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-19, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:1:p:355-:d:304356. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.