IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i19p8268-d424887.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the Operational Flood Forecasting Practices Using Low-Quality Data Input of a Distributed Hydrological Model

Author

Listed:
  • Binquan Li

    (Institute of Water Science and Technology, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China
    College of Hydrology and Water Resources, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China)

  • Zhongmin Liang

    (College of Hydrology and Water Resources, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China)

  • Qingrui Chang

    (School of Hydraulic Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China
    Science and Technology Promotion Centre, Ministry of Water Resources P.R.C., Beijing 100038, China)

  • Wei Zhou

    (School of Public Administration, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China)

  • Huan Wang

    (State Key Laboratory of Hydrology-Water Resources and Hydraulic Engineering, Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute, Nanjing 210029, China)

  • Jun Wang

    (College of Hydrology and Water Resources, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China)

  • Yiming Hu

    (College of Hydrology and Water Resources, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China)

Abstract

Low-quality input data (such as sparse rainfall gauges, low spatial resolution soil type and land use maps) have limited the application of physically-based distributed hydrological models in operational practices in many data-sparse regions. It is necessary to quantify the uncertainty in the deterministic forecast results of distributed models. In this paper, the TOPographic Kinematic Approximation and Integration (TOPKAPI) distributed model was used for deterministic forecasts with low-quality input data, and then the Hydrologic Uncertainty Processor (HUP) was used to provide the probabilistic forecast results for operational practices. Results showed that the deterministic forecasts by TOPKAPI performed poorly in some flood seasons, such as the years 1997, 2001 and 2008, despite which the overall accuracy of the whole study period 1996–2008 could be acceptable and generally reproduced the hydrological behaviors of the catchment (Lushi basin, China). The HUP model can not only provide probabilistic forecasts (e.g., 90% predictive uncertainty bounds), but also provides deterministic forecasts in terms of 50% percentiles. The 50% percentiles obviously improved the forecast accuracy of selected flood events at the leading time of one hour. Besides, the HUP performance decayed with the leading time increasing (6, 12 h). This work revealed that deterministic model outputs had large uncertainties in flood forecasts, and the HUP model may provide an alternative for operational flood forecasting practices in those areas with low-quality data.

Suggested Citation

  • Binquan Li & Zhongmin Liang & Qingrui Chang & Wei Zhou & Huan Wang & Jun Wang & Yiming Hu, 2020. "On the Operational Flood Forecasting Practices Using Low-Quality Data Input of a Distributed Hydrological Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-16, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:19:p:8268-:d:424887
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/19/8268/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/19/8268/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kuaile Feng & Jianzhong Zhou & Yi Liu & Chengwei Lu & Zhongzheng He, 2019. "Hydrological Uncertainty Processor (HUP) with Estimation of the Marginal Distribution by a Gaussian Mixture Model," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 33(9), pages 2975-2990, July.
    2. J. C. J. H. Aerts & W. J. Botzen & K. C. Clarke & S. L. Cutter & J. W. Hall & B. Merz & E. Michel-Kerjan & J. Mysiak & S. Surminski & H. Kunreuther, 2018. "Integrating human behaviour dynamics into flood disaster risk assessment," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 8(3), pages 193-199, March.
    3. Meixiu Yu & Qiongfang Li & Xiaolong Liu & Jianyun Zhang, 2016. "Quantifying the effect on flood regime of land-use pattern changes via hydrological simulation in the upper Huaihe River basin, China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 84(3), pages 2279-2297, December.
    4. Huaping Huang & Zhongmin Liang & Binquan Li & Dong Wang & Yiming Hu & Yujie Li, 2019. "Combination of Multiple Data-Driven Models for Long-Term Monthly Runoff Predictions Based on Bayesian Model Averaging," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 33(9), pages 3321-3338, July.
    5. Brenden Jongman & Stefan Hochrainer-Stigler & Luc Feyen & Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts & Reinhard Mechler & W. J. Wouter Botzen & Laurens M. Bouwer & Georg Pflug & Rodrigo Rojas & Philip J. Ward, 2014. "Increasing stress on disaster-risk finance due to large floods," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 4(4), pages 264-268, April.
    6. Xu, Bin & Zhu, Feilin & Zhong, Ping-an & Chen, Juan & Liu, Weifeng & Ma, Yufei & Guo, Le & Deng, Xiaoliang, 2019. "Identifying long-term effects of using hydropower to complement wind power uncertainty through stochastic programming," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jingyu Li & Yangbo Chen & Yanzheng Zhu & Jun Liu, 2023. "Study of Flood Simulation in Small and Medium-Sized Basins Based on the Liuxihe Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-16, July.
    2. Joško Trošelj & Han Soo Lee & Lena Hobohm, 2023. "Enhancing a Real-Time Flash Flood Predictive Accuracy Approach for the Development of Early Warning Systems: Hydrological Ensemble Hindcasts and Parameterizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-33, September.
    3. Hengxu Jin & Xiaoping Rui & Xiaoyan Li, 2022. "Analysing the Performance of Four Hydrological Models in a Chinese Arid and Semi-Arid Catchment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-15, March.
    4. Yan Zhou & Zhongmin Liang & Binquan Li & Yixin Huang & Kai Wang & Yiming Hu, 2021. "Seamless Integration of Rainfall Spatial Variability and a Conceptual Hydrological Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-16, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Philip Bubeck & Lisa Berghäuser & Paul Hudson & Annegret H. Thieken, 2020. "Using Panel Data to Understand the Dynamics of Human Behavior in Response to Flooding," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(11), pages 2340-2359, November.
    2. Allan Beltrán & David Maddison & Robert J. R. Elliott, 2018. "Assessing the Economic Benefits of Flood Defenses: A Repeat‐Sales Approach," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(11), pages 2340-2367, November.
    3. Mook Bangalore & Andrew Smith & Ted Veldkamp, 2019. "Exposure to Floods, Climate Change, and Poverty in Vietnam," Economics of Disasters and Climate Change, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 79-99, April.
    4. Matteo Coronese & Davide Luzzati, 2022. "Economic impacts of natural hazards and complexity science: a critical review," LEM Papers Series 2022/13, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    5. Belinda Storey & Sally Owen & Christian Zammit & Ilan Noy, 2024. "Insurance retreat in residential properties from future sea level rise in Aotearoa New Zealand," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 177(3), pages 1-21, March.
    6. Zhiqiang Jiang & Zhengyang Tang & Yi Liu & Yuyun Chen & Zhongkai Feng & Yang Xu & Hairong Zhang, 2019. "Area Moment and Error Based Forecasting Difficulty and its Application in Inflow Forecasting Level Evaluation," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 33(13), pages 4553-4568, October.
    7. Wang, Jin & Zhao, Zhipeng & Zhou, Jinglin & Cheng, Chuntian & Su, Huaying, 2024. "Developing operating rules for a hydro–wind–solar hybrid system considering peak-shaving demands," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 360(C).
    8. Guzmics Sándor & Pflug Georg Ch., 2020. "A new extreme value copula and new families of univariate distributions based on Freund’s exponential model," Dependence Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 330-360, January.
    9. Jin, Xiaoyu & Liu, Benxi & Liao, Shengli & Cheng, Chuntian & Zhang, Yi & Zhao, Zhipeng & Lu, Jia, 2022. "Wasserstein metric-based two-stage distributionally robust optimization model for optimal daily peak shaving dispatch of cascade hydroplants under renewable energy uncertainties," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    10. Yang, Yuqi & Zhou, Jianzhong & Liu, Guangbiao & Mo, Li & Wang, Yongqiang & Jia, Benjun & He, Feifei, 2020. "Multi-plan formulation of hydropower generation considering uncertainty of wind power," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    11. Riepin, Iegor & Möbius, Thomas & Müsgens, Felix, 2021. "Modelling uncertainty in coupled electricity and gas systems—Is it worth the effort?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    12. Julien Boulange & Yukiko Hirabayashi & Masahiro Tanoue & Toshinori Yamada, 2023. "Quantitative evaluation of flood damage methodologies under a portfolio of adaptation scenarios," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 118(3), pages 1855-1879, September.
    13. Tovar Reaños, Miguel A., 2021. "Floods, flood policies and changes in welfare and inequality: Evidence from Germany," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    14. Syed Abu Shoaib & Mohammad Zaved Kaiser Khan & Nahid Sultana & Taufique H. Mahmood, 2021. "Quantifying Uncertainty in Food Security Modeling," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, January.
    15. Weili Duan & Bin He & Daniel Nover & Jingli Fan & Guishan Yang & Wen Chen & Huifang Meng & Chuanming Liu, 2016. "Floods and associated socioeconomic damages in China over the last century," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 82(1), pages 401-413, May.
    16. Tian Liu & Peijun Shi & Jian Fang, 2022. "Spatiotemporal variation in global floods with different affected areas and the contribution of influencing factors to flood-induced mortality (1985–2019)," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 111(3), pages 2601-2625, April.
    17. S. Surminski & J. Aerts & W. Botzen & P. Hudson & J. Mysiak & C. Pérez-Blanco, 2015. "Reflections on the current debate on how to link flood insurance and disaster risk reduction in the European Union," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 79(3), pages 1451-1479, December.
    18. Thakur, Jagruti & Hesamzadeh, Mohammad Reza & Date, Paresh & Bunn, Derek, 2023. "Pricing and hedging wind power prediction risk with binary option contracts," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    19. Jun Dong & Anyuan Fu & Yao Liu & Shilin Nie & Peiwen Yang & Linpeng Nie, 2019. "Two-Stage Optimization Model for Two-Side Daily Reserve Capacity of a Power System Considering Demand Response and Wind Power Consumption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-22, December.
    20. Gong, Yu & Liu, Pan & Ming, Bo & Xu, Weifeng & Huang, Kangdi & Li, Xiao, 2021. "Deriving pack rules for hydro–photovoltaic hybrid power systems considering diminishing marginal benefit of energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:19:p:8268-:d:424887. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.