IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i19p8264-d424767.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of Psychometric Properties of the Quality and Satisfaction Questionnaire Focused on Sustainability in Higher Education

Author

Listed:
  • María del Carmen Olmos-Gómez

    (Department of Research Methods and Diagnosis in Education, Faculty of Education and Sport Science, University of Granada, 52005 Melilla, Spain)

  • Mónica Luque-Suárez

    (Department of Sociology, Faculty of Education and Sport Science, University of Granada, 52005 Melilla, Spain)

  • Concetta Ferrara

    (Associazione Culturale Italiana Per La Formazione, A.C.I.F. University of Naples, Via Salvatore Gambardella, 19, 80145 Napoli NA, Italy)

  • Jesús Manuel Cuevas-Rincón

    (Department of Research Methods and Diagnosis in Education, Faculty of Education and Sport Science, University of Granada, 52005 Melilla, Spain)

Abstract

The aim of this research was to develop and validate a questionnaire to assess the quality of education, from a sustainability perspective, in higher education institutions of Naples (Italy), and determine whether differences exist between the groups (families, teachers and, students) with respect to their level of satisfaction concerning that quality, since it is important that education policies promote that assessment from an economic, social, environmental, and organisational dimension. The questionnaire was validated using a quantitative, quasi experimental, cross sectional method. A multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was conducted on a sample of n = 1091 subjects to study the differences between the groups and their level of satisfaction. The results show a good reliability and validity. In this MANOVA, significant differences and large effect sizes were found. Families and teachers consider that quality management in higher education is adequate. The three groups are very satisfied with teaching management, and the teachers’ group has the higher level of satisfaction with teaching planning. It is concluded that this validated questionnaire provides information on the opinions about the quality of education from a sustainability perspective and that the self-assessment of those responsible for teaching is essential to achieve continuous improvement.

Suggested Citation

  • María del Carmen Olmos-Gómez & Mónica Luque-Suárez & Concetta Ferrara & Jesús Manuel Cuevas-Rincón, 2020. "Analysis of Psychometric Properties of the Quality and Satisfaction Questionnaire Focused on Sustainability in Higher Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-16, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:19:p:8264-:d:424767
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/19/8264/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/19/8264/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Amalia Vanacore & Maria Sole Pellegrino, 2019. "How Reliable are Students’ Evaluations of Teaching (SETs)? A Study to Test Student’s Reproducibility and Repeatability," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 146(1), pages 77-89, November.
    2. Ariane Díaz-Iso & Almudena Eizaguirre & Ana García-Olalla, 2019. "Extracurricular Activities in Higher Education and the Promotion of Reflective Learning for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-18, August.
    3. María del Carmen Olmos-Gómez & Mónica Luque Suárez & Concetta Ferrara & Eva María Olmedo-Moreno, 2020. "Quality of Higher Education through the Pursuit of Satisfaction with a Focus on Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-20, March.
    4. Carla Farinha & Sandra Caeiro & Ulisses Azeiteiro, 2019. "Sustainability Strategies in Portuguese Higher Education Institutions: Commitments and Practices from Internal Insights," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-25, June.
    5. Luis Matosas-López & Cesar Bernal-Bravo & Alberto Romero-Ania & Irene Palomero-Ilardia, 2019. "Quality Control Systems in Higher Education Supported by the Use of Mobile Messaging Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-14, October.
    6. Bankole Osita Awuzie & Amal Abuzeinab, 2019. "Modelling Organisational Factors Influencing Sustainable Development Implementation Performance in Higher Education Institutions: An Interpretative Structural Modelling (ISM) Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-18, August.
    7. Sergio W. Carvalho & Márcio de Oliveira Mota, 2010. "The role of trust in creating value and student loyalty in relational exchanges between higher education institutions and their students," Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 145-165, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ismaila Rimi Abubakar & Yusuf A. Aina & Habib M. Alshuwaikhat, 2020. "Sustainable Development at Saudi Arabian Universities: An Overview of Institutional Frameworks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-15, September.
    2. Amila Omazic & Bernd Markus Zunk, 2021. "Semi-Systematic Literature Review on Sustainability and Sustainable Development in Higher Education Institutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-45, July.
    3. María del Carmen Olmos-Gómez & Mónica Luque Suárez & Concetta Ferrara & Eva María Olmedo-Moreno, 2020. "Quality of Higher Education through the Pursuit of Satisfaction with a Focus on Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-20, March.
    4. Nicola Andreij Rieg & Birgitta Gatersleben & Ian Christie, 2021. "Organizational Change Management for Sustainability in Higher Education Institutions: A Systematic Quantitative Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-18, June.
    5. Mercedes Varela-Losada & Azucena Arias-Correa & Uxío Pérez-Rodríguez & Pedro Vega-Marcote, 2019. "How Can Teachers Be Encouraged to Commit to Sustainability? Evaluation of a Teacher-Training Experience in Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-12, August.
    6. Kalafatis, Stavros P. & Ledden, Lesley & Riley, Debra & Singh, Jaywant, 2016. "The added value of brand alliances in higher education," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 3122-3132.
    7. Maria Rosario Perello-Marín & Gabriela Ribes-Giner & Odette Pantoja Díaz, 2018. "Enhancing Education for Sustainable Development in Environmental University Programmes: A Co-Creation Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-17, January.
    8. Melchor Gómez-García & Luis Matosas-López & Julio Ruiz-Palmero, 2020. "Social Networks Use Patterns among University Youth: The Validity and Reliability of an Updated Measurement Instrument," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-14, April.
    9. Yi-Chen Lai & Li-Hsun Peng, 2019. "Effective Teaching and Activities of Excellent Teachers for the Sustainable Development of Higher Design Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-27, December.
    10. Yuan Li & Tianhong Liao & Jia Li, 2023. "Optimizing Higher Education for Sustainable Development through the Design and Implementation of the Global Engagement Program," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-16, June.
    11. Mara Bauer & Sebastian Niedlich & Marco Rieckmann & Inka Bormann & Larissa Jaeger, 2020. "Interdependencies of Culture and Functions of Sustainability Governance at Higher Education Institutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-21, April.
    12. Gracia González-Gijón & Nazaret Martínez-Heredia & Francisco Javier Jiménez Ríos & Andrés Soriano Díaz, 2021. "Analysis of Ecological Values in Future Education Professionals in Andalusia (Spain)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-12, July.
    13. Ariane Díaz-Iso & Almudena Eizaguirre & Ana García-Olalla, 2020. "Understanding the Role of Social Interactions in the Development of an Extracurricular University Volunteer Activity in a Developing Country," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-17, June.
    14. Nathaniel S. Wright & Tony G. Reames, 2020. "Unraveling the Links between Organizational Factors and Perceptions of Community Sustainability Performance: An Empirical Investigation of Community-Based Nongovernmental Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-20, June.
    15. Neszveda, Gábor & Horváth, Zsófia, 2024. "Új szempont a magyar felsőoktatási intézmények teljesítményének mérésében - az egyetemek online láthatósága [Online visibility - A new aspect of measuring the performance of Hungarian higher educat," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(7), pages 755-790.
    16. Małgorzata Dzimińska & Justyna Fijałkowska & Łukasz Sułkowski, 2018. "Trust-Based Quality Culture Conceptual Model for Higher Education Institutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-22, July.
    17. María del Carmen Olmos-Gómez & Mónica Luque-Suárez & Diego Becerril-Ruiz & Jesús Manuel Cuevas-Rincón, 2021. "Gender and Socioeconomic Status as Factors of Individual Differences in Pre-University Students’ Decision-Making for Careers, with a Focus on Family Influence and Psychosocial Factors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-12, February.
    18. Zhenwen Liu & Hsi-Chi Yang & Yan-Chyuan Shiau, 2020. "Investigation on Evaluation Framework of Elementary School Teaching Materials for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-19, May.
    19. Fátima Leal & Bruno Veloso & Carla Santos Pereira & Fernando Moreira & Natércia Durão & Natacha Jesus Silva, 2022. "Interpretable Success Prediction in Higher Education Institutions Using Pedagogical Surveys," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-18, October.
    20. Ana C. Urquidi-Martín & Carmen Tamarit-Aznar & Javier Sánchez-García, 2019. "Determinants of the Effectiveness of Using Renewable Resource Management-Based Simulations in the Development of Critical Thinking: An Application of the Experiential Learning Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-15, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:19:p:8264-:d:424767. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.