IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i19p7862-d417961.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

BIM-VE-Based Optimization of Green Building Envelope from the Perspective of both Energy Saving and Life Cycle Cost

Author

Listed:
  • Zhenmin Yuan

    (School of Mechanics and Civil Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
    State Key Laboratory for Geomechanics and Deep Underground Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Jianliang Zhou

    (School of Mechanics and Civil Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
    State Key Laboratory for Geomechanics and Deep Underground Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Yaning Qiao

    (School of Mechanics and Civil Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
    State Key Laboratory for Geomechanics and Deep Underground Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Yadi Zhang

    (School of Civil Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China)

  • Dandan Liu

    (School of Mechanics and Civil Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Hui Zhu

    (School of Mechanics and Civil Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

Abstract

In the context of the increasingly severe energy crisis and global warming, green buildings and their energy-saving issues are being paid more attention in the world. Since envelope optimization can significantly reduce the energy consumption of green buildings, value engineering (VE) technology and building information modeling (BIM) technology are used to optimize the envelope of green buildings, which takes into account both energy saving and life cycle cost. The theoretical framework of optimization for green building envelope based on BIM-VE is proposed, including a BIM model for architecture, a life cycle cost analysis model, energy-saving analysis model, and a value analysis model. In the life-cycle cost model, a mathematical formula for the life-cycle cost is established, and BIM technology is used to generate a bill of quantity. In the energy-saving analysis model, a mathematical formula for energy saving is established, and BIM technology is used for the building energy simulation. In the scheme decision-making sub-model, VE technology integrating life cycle cost with energy saving is used to assess the envelope schemes and select the optimal one. A prefabricated project case is used to simulate and test the established methodology. The important results show that the 16 envelope schemes make the 16 corresponding designed buildings meet the green building evaluation standards, and the optimal envelope scheme is the “energy-saving and anti-theft door + exterior window 2+ floor 1+ exterior wall 1 + inner shear wall + inner partition wall 2 + planted roof” with the value 10.80 × 10 −2 MW·h/ten thousand yuan. A significant finding is that the value generally rises with the increase of energy-saving rate while the life cycle cost is irregular with the increase of energy-saving rate. Compared with previous efforts in the literature, this study introduces VE technology into architectural design to further expand the current boundary of building energy-saving theory. The findings and suggestions will provide a valuable reference and guidance for the architectural design industry to optimize the envelope of green buildings from the perspective of both energy saving and life cycle cost.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhenmin Yuan & Jianliang Zhou & Yaning Qiao & Yadi Zhang & Dandan Liu & Hui Zhu, 2020. "BIM-VE-Based Optimization of Green Building Envelope from the Perspective of both Energy Saving and Life Cycle Cost," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-16, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:19:p:7862-:d:417961
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/19/7862/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/19/7862/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cristina Baglivo & Paolo Maria Congedo & Matteo Di Cataldo & Luigi Damiano Coluccia & Delia D’Agostino, 2017. "Envelope Design Optimization by Thermal Modelling of a Building in a Warm Climate," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-34, November.
    2. Pathomthat Chiradeja & Atthapol Ngaopitakkul, 2019. "Energy and Economic Analysis of Tropical Building Envelope Material in Compliance with Thailand’s Building Energy Code," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-23, December.
    3. Shilei Lu & Minchao Fan & Yiqun Zhao, 2018. "A System to Pre-Evaluate the Suitability of Energy-Saving Technology for Green Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-19, October.
    4. Huang, Zhiyu & Yuan, Hongping & Shen, Liyin, 2012. "Contribution of promoting the green residence assessment scheme to energy saving," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 374-381.
    5. Tran, Duc-Hoc & Luong, Duc-Long & Chou, Jui-Sheng, 2020. "Nature-inspired metaheuristic ensemble model for forecasting energy consumption in residential buildings," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    6. Joseph Iwaro & Abrahams Mwasha & Pramenath Narinesingh, 2017. "Validation of integrated performance model for sustainable envelope performance assessment and design," International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, Oxford University Press, vol. 12(2), pages 189-207.
    7. Zoran Pučko & Damjan Maučec & Nataša Šuman, 2020. "Energy and Cost Analysis of Building Envelope Components Using BIM: A Systematic Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-24, May.
    8. Raji, Babak & Tenpierik, Martin J. & van den Dobbelsteen, Andy, 2015. "The impact of greening systems on building energy performance: A literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 610-623.
    9. Shilei Lu & Zichen Wang & Tianshuai Zhang, 2020. "Quantitative Analysis and Multi-Index Evaluation of the Green Building Envelope Performance in the Cold Area of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-38, January.
    10. Ying Zhang & Jian Kang & Hong Jin, 2018. "A Review of Green Building Development in China from the Perspective of Energy Saving," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-18, February.
    11. Kokogiannakis, Georgios & Darkwa, Jo, 2014. "Support for the integration of green roof constructions within Chinese building energy performance policies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 71-79.
    12. Bratislav Svetozarevic & Moritz Begle & Prageeth Jayathissa & Stefan Caranovic & Robert F. Shepherd & Zoltan Nagy & Illias Hischier & Johannes Hofer & Arno Schlueter, 2019. "Dynamic photovoltaic building envelopes for adaptive energy and comfort management," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 4(8), pages 671-682, August.
    13. Omrany, Hossein & Ghaffarianhoseini, Ali & Ghaffarianhoseini, Amirhosein & Raahemifar, Kaamran & Tookey, John, 2016. "Application of passive wall systems for improving the energy efficiency in buildings: A comprehensive review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 1252-1269.
    14. Shilei Lu & Ran Wang & Shaoqun Zheng, 2017. "Passive Optimization Design Based on Particle Swarm Optimization in Rural Buildings of the Hot Summer and Warm Winter Zone of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-30, December.
    15. Andre Feliks Setiawan & Tzu-Ling Huang & Chun-Ta Tzeng & Chi-Ming Lai, 2015. "The Effects of Envelope Design Alternatives on the Energy Consumption of Residential Houses in Indonesia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-15, April.
    16. Wang, Zeyu & Srinivasan, Ravi S., 2017. "A review of artificial intelligence based building energy use prediction: Contrasting the capabilities of single and ensemble prediction models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 796-808.
    17. Yinqi Zhang & He Wang & Weijun Gao & Fan Wang & Nan Zhou & Daniel M. Kammen & Xiaoyu Ying, 2019. "A Survey of the Status and Challenges of Green Building Development in Various Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-29, September.
    18. Xu, Guangyue & Wang, Weimin, 2020. "China’s energy consumption in construction and building sectors: An outlook to 2100," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    19. Sadineni, Suresh B. & Madala, Srikanth & Boehm, Robert F., 2011. "Passive building energy savings: A review of building envelope components," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(8), pages 3617-3631.
    20. Coma, Julià & Chàfer, Marta & Pérez, Gabriel & Cabeza, Luisa F., 2020. "How internal heat loads of buildings affect the effectiveness of vertical greenery systems? An experimental study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 919-930.
    21. Lin, Yu-Hao & Tsai, Kang-Ting & Lin, Min-Der & Yang, Ming-Der, 2016. "Design optimization of office building envelope configurations for energy conservation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 336-346.
    22. Xiaohuan Xie & Yi Lu & Zhonghua Gou, 2017. "Green Building Pro-Environment Behaviors: Are Green Users Also Green Buyers?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-13, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jungsik Choi & Sejin Lee, 2023. "A Suggestion of the Alternatives Evaluation Method through IFC-Based Building Energy Performance Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-14, January.
    2. Kropotin, P. & Marchuk, I., 2024. "Analytical and quantitative assessment of capital expenditures for construction of an aboveground suspended weight energy storage," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    3. Belen Moreno Santamaria & Fernando del Ama Gonzalo & Matthew Griffin & Benito Lauret Aguirregabiria & Juan A. Hernandez Ramos, 2021. "Life Cycle Assessment of Dynamic Water Flow Glazing Envelopes: A Case Study with Real Test Facilities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-17, April.
    4. Clyde Zhengdao Li & Mingcong Hu & Bing Xiao & Zhe Chen & Vivian W. Y. Tam & Yiyu Zhao, 2021. "Mapping the Knowledge Domains of Emerging Advanced Technologies in the Management of Prefabricated Construction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-31, August.
    5. Tatjana Vilutienė & Rasa Džiugaitė-Tumėnienė & Diana Kalibatienė & Darius Kalibatas, 2021. "How BIM Contributes to a Building’s Energy Efficiency throughout Its Whole Life Cycle: Systematic Mapping," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-27, October.
    6. Fernando del Ama Gonzalo & Belen Moreno Santamaria & José Antonio Ferrándiz Gea & Matthew Griffin & Juan A. Hernandez Ramos, 2021. "Zero Energy Building Economic and Energetic Assessment with Simulated and Real Data Using Photovoltaics and Water Flow Glazing," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-20, June.
    7. Genbao Liu & Tengfei Zhao & Hong Yan & Han Wu & Fuming Wang, 2022. "Evaluation of Urban Green Building Design Schemes to Achieve Sustainability Based on the Projection Pursuit Model Optimized by the Atomic Orbital Search," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-23, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiaodong Yang & Jiayu Zhang & Xianbo Zhao, 2018. "Factors Affecting Green Residential Building Development: Social Network Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-21, May.
    2. Yu Cao & Cong Xu & Syahrul Nizam Kamaruzzaman & Nur Mardhiyah Aziz, 2022. "A Systematic Review of Green Building Development in China: Advantages, Challenges and Future Directions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-29, September.
    3. Ascione, Fabrizio & De Masi, Rosa Francesca & de Rossi, Filippo & Ruggiero, Silvia & Vanoli, Giuseppe Peter, 2016. "Optimization of building envelope design for nZEBs in Mediterranean climate: Performance analysis of residential case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 938-957.
    4. Shi Yin & Yudan Zhao, 2024. "An agent-based evolutionary system model of the transformation from building material industry (BMI) to green intelligent BMI under supply chain management," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    5. Zhang, Lili & Hou, Yuyao & Liu, Zu’an & Du, Junfei & Xu, Long & Zhang, Guomin & Shi, Long, 2020. "Trombe wall for a residential building in Sichuan-Tibet alpine valley – A case study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 31-46.
    6. Belen Moreno Santamaria & Fernando del Ama Gonzalo & Matthew Griffin & Benito Lauret Aguirregabiria & Juan A. Hernandez Ramos, 2021. "Life Cycle Assessment of Dynamic Water Flow Glazing Envelopes: A Case Study with Real Test Facilities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-17, April.
    7. Miroslav Čekon & Richard Slávik, 2017. "A Non-Ventilated Solar Façade Concept Based on Selective and Transparent Insulation Material Integration: An Experimental Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-21, June.
    8. Jungsik Choi & Sejin Lee, 2023. "A Suggestion of the Alternatives Evaluation Method through IFC-Based Building Energy Performance Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-14, January.
    9. Lavinia Denisia Cuc & Dana Rad & Daniel Manațe & Silviu Gabriel Szentesi & Anca Dicu & Mioara Florina Pantea & Vanina Adoriana Trifan & Cosmin Silviu Raul Joldeș & Graziella Corina Bâtcă-Dumitru, 2023. "Representations of the Smart Green Concept and the Intention to Implement IoT in Romanian Real Estate Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-15, May.
    10. Verbeke, Stijn & Audenaert, Amaryllis, 2018. "Thermal inertia in buildings: A review of impacts across climate and building use," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 2300-2318.
    11. Kropotin, P. & Marchuk, I., 2024. "Analytical and quantitative assessment of capital expenditures for construction of an aboveground suspended weight energy storage," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    12. Krzysztof Grygierek & Joanna Ferdyn-Grygierek & Anna Gumińska & Łukasz Baran & Magdalena Barwa & Kamila Czerw & Paulina Gowik & Klaudia Makselan & Klaudia Potyka & Agnes Psikuta, 2020. "Energy and Environmental Analysis of Single-Family Houses Located in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-25, May.
    13. Su, Yuan & Wang, Linwei & Feng, Wei & Zhou, Nan & Wang, Luyuan, 2021. "Analysis of green building performance in cold coastal climates: An in-depth evaluation of green buildings in Dalian, China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    14. Elaouzy, Y. & El Fadar, A., 2022. "Energy, economic and environmental benefits of integrating passive design strategies into buildings: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    15. Qu, Yue & Chen, Jiayu & Liu, Lifang & Xu, Tao & Wu, Huijun & Zhou, Xiaoqing, 2020. "Study on properties of phase change foam concrete block mixed with paraffin / fumed silica composite phase change material," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 1127-1135.
    16. Lilliana L. H. Peng & C. Y. Jim, 2015. "Seasonal and Diurnal Thermal Performance of a Subtropical Extensive Green Roof: The Impacts of Background Weather Parameters," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-16, August.
    17. Zhang, Haihua & Yang, Dong & Tam, Vivian W.Y. & Tao, Yao & Zhang, Guomin & Setunge, Sujeeva & Shi, Long, 2021. "A critical review of combined natural ventilation techniques in sustainable buildings," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    18. López, Marlén & Rubio, Ramón & Martín, Santiago & Ben Croxford,, 2017. "How plants inspire façades. From plants to architecture: Biomimetic principles for the development of adaptive architectural envelopes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 692-703.
    19. Abhinandana Boodi & Karim Beddiar & Yassine Amirat & Mohamed Benbouzid, 2022. "Building Thermal-Network Models: A Comparative Analysis, Recommendations, and Perspectives," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-27, February.
    20. He, Q. & Tapia, F. & Reith, A., 2023. "Quantifying the influence of nature-based solutions on building cooling and heating energy demand: A climate specific review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:19:p:7862-:d:417961. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.