IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i12p4949-d372770.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Critical Risks Method (CRM): A New Safety Allocation Approach for a Critical Infrastructure

Author

Listed:
  • Gianpaolo Di Bona

    (Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, 03043 Cassino FR, Italy)

  • Antonio Forcina

    (Department of Engineering, University of Naples “Parthenope”, 80100 Naples, Italy)

  • Domenico Falcone

    (Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, 03043 Cassino FR, Italy)

  • Luca Silvestri

    (Department of Engineering, University “Niccolò Cusano”, 00166 Roma RM, Italy)

Abstract

In the current research, a safety allocation technique named the Critical Risks Method (CRM) has been developed. Starting from a literature review, we analyzed the shortcomings of conventional methods. The outcomes show the primary two criticalities of the most important safety allocation approaches: (1) They are developed for series configuration, but not for parallel ones; (2) they ordinarily give only qualitative outputs, but not quantitative ones. Moreover, by applying the conventional methods, an increase in safety of the units to ensure the safety target leads to an increase of the production costs of the units. The proposed strategy can overcome the shortcomings of traditional techniques with a safety approach useful to series–parallel systems in order to obtain quantitative outputs in terms of failures in a year. The CRM considers six factors that are able to ensure its applicability to a great variety of critical infrastructures. In addition, CRM is described by a simply analytic definition. The CRM was applied to a critical infrastructure (Liquid Nitrogen Cooling Installation) in a nuclear plant designed with series–parallel units. By comparing the CRM outputs with databank safety values, the proposed method was validated.

Suggested Citation

  • Gianpaolo Di Bona & Antonio Forcina & Domenico Falcone & Luca Silvestri, 2020. "Critical Risks Method (CRM): A New Safety Allocation Approach for a Critical Infrastructure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-19, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:12:p:4949-:d:372770
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/12/4949/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/12/4949/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anna Kosovac & Brian Davidson & Hector Malano, 2019. "Are We Objective? A Study into the Effectiveness of Risk Measurement in the Water Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-13, February.
    2. Gianpaolo Di Bona & Alessandro Silvestri & Antonio Forcina & Antonella Petrillo, 2018. "Total efficient risk priority number (TERPN): a new method for risk assessment," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(11), pages 1384-1408, November.
    3. Panagiotis K. Marhavilas & Michail Filippidis & Georgios K. Koulinas & Dimitrios E. Koulouriotis, 2020. "A HAZOP with MCDM Based Risk-Assessment Approach: Focusing on the Deviations with Economic/Health/Environmental Impacts in a Process Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-29, January.
    4. Vaurio, Jussi K., 2005. "Uncertainties and quantification of common cause failure rates and probabilities for system analyses," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 90(2), pages 186-195.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. H. Metatla & M. Rouainia, 2022. "Functional and dysfunctional analysis of a safety instrumented system (SIS) through the common cause failures (CCFs) assessment. Case of high integrity protection pressure system (HIPPS)," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 13(4), pages 1932-1954, August.
    2. Shihab Uddin & Qing Lu & Hung Nguyen, 2021. "Truck Impact on Buried Water Pipes in Interdependent Water and Road Infrastructures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-16, October.
    3. Fotis Kitsios & Elpiniki Chatzidimitriou & Maria Kamariotou, 2023. "The ISO/IEC 27001 Information Security Management Standard: How to Extract Value from Data in the IT Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-17, March.
    4. Dan Su & Yi-Sheng Liu & Xin-Tong Li & Xiao-Yan Chen & Dong-Han Li, 2020. "Management Path of Concrete Beam Bridge in China from the Perspective of Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-22, September.
    5. Barbara Tchórzewska-Cieślak & Katarzyna Pietrucha-Urbanik & Emilia Kuliczkowska, 2020. "An Approach to Analysing Water Consumers’ Acceptance of Risk-Reduction Costs," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-16, November.
    6. Ievgen Babeshko & Oleg Illiashenko & Vyacheslav Kharchenko & Kostiantyn Leontiev, 2022. "Towards Trustworthy Safety Assessment by Providing Expert and Tool-Based XMECA Techniques," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(13), pages 1-25, June.
    7. Fabio De Felice & Ilaria Baffo & Antonella Petrillo, 2022. "Critical Infrastructures Overview: Past, Present and Future," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-20, February.
    8. Xinxing Yuan & Fernando Moreu & Maryam Hojati, 2021. "Cost-Effective Inspection of Rebar Spacing and Clearance Using RGB-D Sensors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-17, November.
    9. Ben J. M. Ale & Des N. D. Hartford & David H. Slater, 2021. "Living with Legacy Risk—The Limits of Practicalities?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-14, March.
    10. Suchismita Satapathy, 2022. "Work place discomfort and risk factors for construction site workers," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 13(2), pages 668-680, April.
    11. Saeideh Sheikhpour & Amin Kargar-Barzi & Ali Mahani, 2022. "A novel component mixing and mixed redundancy strategy for reliability optimization," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 13(1), pages 328-346, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. James J. H. Liou & Perry C. Y. Liu & Huai-Wei Lo, 2020. "A Failure Mode Assessment Model Based on Neutrosophic Logic for Switched-Mode Power Supply Risk Analysis," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-19, December.
    2. Suleyman Enes Hacibektasoglu & Bulent Mertoglu & Hakan Tozan, 2021. "Application of a Novel Hybrid f-SC Risk Analysis Method in the Paint Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-23, December.
    3. Min Zhang & Zhijian Zhang & Ali Mosleh & Sijuan Chen, 2017. "Common cause failure model updating for risk monitoring in nuclear power plants based on alpha factor model," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 231(3), pages 209-220, June.
    4. Abou, Seraphin C., 2010. "Performance assessment of multi-state systems with critical failure modes: Application to the flotation metallic arsenic circuit," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(6), pages 614-622.
    5. Hoepfer, V.M. & Saleh, J.H. & Marais, K.B., 2009. "On the value of redundancy subject to common-cause failures: Toward the resolution of an on-going debate," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(12), pages 1904-1916.
    6. Muhammet Gul & Muhammet Fatih Ak, 2022. "Occupational Risk Assessment for Flight Schools: A 3,4-Quasirung Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making-Based Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-22, July.
    7. Lizhong Tong & Zhongmin Pu & Jizheng Ma, 2019. "Maintenance Supplier Evaluation and Selection for Safe and Sustainable Production in the Chemical Industry: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-15, March.
    8. Fotis Kitsios & Elpiniki Chatzidimitriou & Maria Kamariotou, 2022. "Developing a Risk Analysis Strategy Framework for Impact Assessment in Information Security Management Systems: A Case Study in IT Consulting Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-19, January.
    9. Cui, Lirong & Li, Haijun, 2007. "Analytical method for reliability and MTTF assessment of coherent systems with dependent components," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(3), pages 300-307.
    10. Martin Folch-Calvo & Francisco Brocal-Fernández & Cristina González-Gaya & Miguel A. Sebastián, 2020. "Analysis and Characterization of Risk Methodologies Applied to Industrial Parks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-35, September.
    11. KanÄ ev, DuÅ¡ko & ÄŒepin, Marko, 2012. "A new method for explicit modelling of single failure event within different common cause failure groups," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 84-93.
    12. Veljanovski, N. & ÄŒepin, M., 2024. "Event tree-based risk and financial assessment for power plants," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    13. Tatiana Karkoszka, 2023. "Operational Control Model Based on Integrated Failure Analysis and Risk Assessment in Sustainable Technological Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-24, December.
    14. Jiaxu Zhou & Xiaohu Jia & Guoqiang Xu & Junhan Jia & Rihan Hai & Chongsen Gao & Shuo Zhang, 2019. "The Relationship between Different Types of Alarm Sounds and Children’s Perceived Risk Based on Their Physiological Responses," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-17, December.
    15. Rocío Rodríguez-Rivero & Isabel Ortiz-Marcos & Luis Ballesteros-Sánchez & Xabier Martínez-Beneitez, 2020. "Identifying Risks for Better Project Management between Two Different Cultures: The Chinese and the Spanish," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-14, September.
    16. L Xing & P Boddu & Y Sun & W Wang, 2010. "Reliability analysis of static and dynamic fault-tolerant systems subject to probabilistic common-cause failures," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 224(1), pages 43-53, March.
    17. Levitin, Gregory & Xing, Liudong & Amari, Suprasad V. & Dai, Yuanshun, 2013. "Reliability of non-repairable phased-mission systems with propagated failures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 218-228.
    18. Quigley, John & Walls, Lesley, 2011. "Mixing Bayes and empirical Bayes inference to anticipate the realization of engineering concerns about variant system designs," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(8), pages 933-941.
    19. Zhou, Taotao & Droguett, Enrique López & Modarres, Mohammad, 2020. "A common cause failure model for components under age-related degradation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    20. Zaretalab, Arash & Hajipour, Vahid & Tavana, Madjid, 2020. "Redundancy allocation problem with multi-state component systems and reliable supplier selection," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:12:p:4949-:d:372770. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.