IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v119y2013icp218-228.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reliability of non-repairable phased-mission systems with propagated failures

Author

Listed:
  • Levitin, Gregory
  • Xing, Liudong
  • Amari, Suprasad V.
  • Dai, Yuanshun

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a recursive and exact method for reliability evaluation of phased-mission systems with failures originating from some system elements that can propagate causing the common cause failures of groups of elements. The system consists of multiple, consecutive, non-overlapping phases of operation, and non-identical binary non-repairable elements that can fail individually or due to propagated failures originating from other elements. The overall system can have binary states corresponding to the mission success and failure or multiple states characterized by different levels of system performance. Based on conditional probabilities as well as the branch and bound principle, the proposed method takes into account dynamic changes in system structure and demand across different phases. It also considers time-varying, phase-dependent failure rates and associated cumulative damage effects for the system elements. The main advantage of this method is that it does not require composition of decision diagrams and can be fully automated. Both an analytical example and a numerical example are analyzed to illustrate the proposed method.

Suggested Citation

  • Levitin, Gregory & Xing, Liudong & Amari, Suprasad V. & Dai, Yuanshun, 2013. "Reliability of non-repairable phased-mission systems with propagated failures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 218-228.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:119:y:2013:i:c:p:218-228
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2013.06.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832013001701
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2013.06.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hoepfer, V.M. & Saleh, J.H. & Marais, K.B., 2009. "On the value of redundancy subject to common-cause failures: Toward the resolution of an on-going debate," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(12), pages 1904-1916.
    2. A Shrestha & L Xing, 2008. "Improved modular reliability analyses of hybrid phased mission systems," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 222(4), pages 507-520, December.
    3. Vaurio, Jussi K., 2005. "Uncertainties and quantification of common cause failure rates and probabilities for system analyses," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 90(2), pages 186-195.
    4. Xing, Liudong & Levitin, Gregory, 2013. "BDD-based reliability evaluation of phased-mission systems with internal/external common-cause failures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 145-153.
    5. Levitin, Gregory & Hausken, Kjell, 2010. "Separation in homogeneous systems with independent identical elements," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 203(3), pages 625-634, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peng, Rui & Wu, Di & Xiao, Hui & Xing, Liudong & Gao, Kaiye, 2019. "Redundancy versus protection for a non-reparable phased-mission system subject to external impacts," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    2. Wang, Guanjun & Peng, Rui & Xing, Liudong, 2018. "Reliability evaluation of unrepairable k-out-of-n: G systems with phased-mission requirements based on record values," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 191-197.
    3. Levitin, Gregory & Finkelstein, Maxim & Dai, Yuanshun, 2017. "Redundancy optimization for series-parallel phased mission systems exposed to random shocks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 554-560.
    4. Huang, Xianzhen & Aslett, Louis J.M. & Coolen, Frank P.A., 2019. "Reliability analysis of general phased mission systems with a new survival signature," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 416-422.
    5. Wu, Xiaoyue & Hillston, Jane, 2015. "Mission reliability of semi-Markov systems under generalized operational time requirements," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 122-129.
    6. Mo, Huadong & Xie, Min & Levitin, Gregory, 2015. "Optimal resource distribution between protection and redundancy considering the time and uncertainties of attacks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 243(1), pages 200-210.
    7. Chen, Shun & Zhao, Xudong & Chen, Zhilong & Hou, Benwei & Wu, Yipeng, 2022. "A game-theoretic method to optimize allocation of defensive resource to protect urban water treatment plants against physical attacks," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 36(C).
    8. Matsuoka, Takeshi, 2023. "Reliability analysis of a BWR plant system at startup stage  - analysis by the GO-FLOW methodology with consideration of loop structures and phased mission problem -," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    9. Zaitseva, Elena & Levashenko, Vitaly & Kostolny, Jozef, 2015. "Importance analysis based on logical differential calculus and Binary Decision Diagram," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 135-144.
    10. Li, Shumin & Si, Shubin & Dui, Hongyan & Cai, Zhiqiang & Sun, Shudong, 2014. "A novel decision diagrams extension method," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 107-115.
    11. Min Zhang & Zhijian Zhang & Ali Mosleh & Sijuan Chen, 2017. "Common cause failure model updating for risk monitoring in nuclear power plants based on alpha factor model," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 231(3), pages 209-220, June.
    12. Xing, Liudong & Levitin, Gregory, 2013. "BDD-based reliability evaluation of phased-mission systems with internal/external common-cause failures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 145-153.
    13. Gianpaolo Di Bona & Antonio Forcina & Domenico Falcone & Luca Silvestri, 2020. "Critical Risks Method (CRM): A New Safety Allocation Approach for a Critical Infrastructure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-19, June.
    14. Gangwal, Utkarsh & Singh, Mayank & Pandey, Pradumn Kumar & Kamboj, Deepak & Chatterjee, Samrat & Bhatia, Udit, 2022. "Identifying early-warning indicators of onset of sudden collapse in networked infrastructure systems against sequential disruptions," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 591(C).
    15. Fan, Mengfei & Zeng, Zhiguo & Zio, Enrico & Kang, Rui & Chen, Ying, 2018. "A stochastic hybrid systems model of common-cause failures of degrading components," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 159-170.
    16. Abou, Seraphin C., 2010. "Performance assessment of multi-state systems with critical failure modes: Application to the flotation metallic arsenic circuit," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(6), pages 614-622.
    17. Vu, Hai Canh & Do, Phuc & Barros, Anne & Bérenguer, Christophe, 2014. "Maintenance grouping strategy for multi-component systems with dynamic contexts," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 233-249.
    18. Fiondella, Lance & Xing, Liudong, 2015. "Discrete and continuous reliability models for systems with identically distributed correlated components," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 1-10.
    19. Jung, Woo Sik, 2015. "A method to improve cutset probability calculation in probabilistic safety assessment of nuclear power plants," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 134-142.
    20. Hoepfer, V.M. & Saleh, J.H. & Marais, K.B., 2009. "On the value of redundancy subject to common-cause failures: Toward the resolution of an on-going debate," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(12), pages 1904-1916.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:119:y:2013:i:c:p:218-228. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.