IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i3p993-d314485.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A HAZOP with MCDM Based Risk-Assessment Approach: Focusing on the Deviations with Economic/Health/Environmental Impacts in a Process Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Panagiotis K. Marhavilas

    (Department of Production and Management Engineering, Democritus-University of Thrace, 67132 Xanthi, Greece)

  • Michail Filippidis

    (Department of Production and Management Engineering, Democritus-University of Thrace, 67132 Xanthi, Greece)

  • Georgios K. Koulinas

    (Department of Production and Management Engineering, Democritus-University of Thrace, 67132 Xanthi, Greece)

  • Dimitrios E. Koulouriotis

    (Department of Production and Management Engineering, Democritus-University of Thrace, 67132 Xanthi, Greece)

Abstract

A joint-analysis by the use of (i) the multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) technique of Typical-Analytical-Hierarchy-Process (T_AHP) and Fuzzy-Analytical-Hierarchy-Process (F_AHP) with (ii) the Hazard and Operability (HAZOP) method respectively, was conducted in a sour-crude-oil process industry (SCOPI), focusing on the deviations with economic/health/environmental impact. Consequently, the intention of this paper is dual; that means the first one is the presentation and application of the traditional HAZOP method on a SCOPI, and the second one the illustration and usage of the combined HAZOP_TAHP/FAHP framework in the previous referred industry, via the resulted hazards with economical, health and also environmental impacts, unveiling the sustainable dimension of this approach. The choice of the particular SCOPI for executing the HAZOP process is greatly powerful for the implementation of this approach, due to the plentiful hazards that the process includes, and due to its sophisticated design, as well. Originally, the conventional HAZOP study was carried out for finding out the potential destructive causes of abnormal circumstances in the SCOPI’s establishment. Subsequently, the defined (by HAZOP) hazards with particular economic, health and environmental impacts were elaborated by the T_AHP and F_AHP techniques in order to broaden the HAZOP results and prioritize the risks in the worksite of the SCOPI. It is worthwhile mentioning that this joint-analysis can afford a reliable base to enhance procedure safety and upgrade the occupational health safety’s level (OHS). Likewise, it might be a constructive means for the decision-makers to: (i) evaluate the urgent situation of the restricted resources’ investment, in measures of preventing particular deviations (like the ones with economical, health and environmental consequences), and (ii) to endorse the sustainable growth of this industry, taking into account that a significant part of literature utilized the issue of sustainability as a frame for the development of OHS RAA techniques.

Suggested Citation

  • Panagiotis K. Marhavilas & Michail Filippidis & Georgios K. Koulinas & Dimitrios E. Koulouriotis, 2020. "A HAZOP with MCDM Based Risk-Assessment Approach: Focusing on the Deviations with Economic/Health/Environmental Impacts in a Process Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-29, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:3:p:993-:d:314485
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/3/993/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/3/993/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. G.K. Koulinas & O.E. Demesouka & P.K. Marhavilas & A.P. Vavatsikos & D.E. Koulouriotis, 2019. "Risk Assessment Using Fuzzy TOPSIS and PRAT for Sustainable Engineering Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15, January.
    2. Panagiotis Marhavilas & Dimitrios Koulouriotis & Ioannis Nikolaou & Sotiria Tsotoulidou, 2018. "International Occupational Health and Safety Management-Systems Standards as a Frame for the Sustainability: Mapping the Territory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-26, October.
    3. Marhavilas, P.K. & Koulouriotis, D.E., 2012. "A combined usage of stochastic and quantitative risk assessment methods in the worksites: Application on an electric power provider," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 97(1), pages 36-46.
    4. Rajagopal, 2014. "The Human Factors," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Architecting Enterprise, chapter 9, pages 225-249, Palgrave Macmillan.
    5. Chang, Da-Yong, 1996. "Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(3), pages 649-655, December.
    6. Marhavilas, P.K. & Koulouriotis, D.E. & Spartalis, S.H., 2013. "Harmonic analysis of occupational-accident time-series as a part of the quantified risk evaluation in worksites: Application on electric power industry and construction sector," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 8-25.
    7. Thomas L. Saaty, 1994. "How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 24(6), pages 19-43, December.
    8. Jagtman, H.M. & Hale, A.R. & Heijer, T., 2005. "A support tool for identifying evaluation issues of road safety measures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 90(2), pages 206-216.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gianpaolo Di Bona & Antonio Forcina & Domenico Falcone & Luca Silvestri, 2020. "Critical Risks Method (CRM): A New Safety Allocation Approach for a Critical Infrastructure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-19, June.
    2. Fotis Kitsios & Elpiniki Chatzidimitriou & Maria Kamariotou, 2022. "Developing a Risk Analysis Strategy Framework for Impact Assessment in Information Security Management Systems: A Case Study in IT Consulting Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-19, January.
    3. Suleyman Enes Hacibektasoglu & Bulent Mertoglu & Hakan Tozan, 2021. "Application of a Novel Hybrid f-SC Risk Analysis Method in the Paint Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-23, December.
    4. Robertas Alzbutas & Mindaugas Vaisnoras & Inga Saruniene & Ricardas Krikstolaitis & Mindaugas Valincius & Egidijus Babilas & Juozas Augutis & Sigitas Rimkevicius & Tomas Iesmantas & Feliksas Anusauska, 2021. "Aggregated Risk Assessment and Survey for Risk Reduction in Oil Terminals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-21, November.
    5. Georgios K. Koulinas & Olympia E. Demesouka & Gerasimos G. Bougelis & Dimitrios E. Koulouriotis, 2022. "Risk Prioritization in a Natural Gas Compressor Station Construction Project Using the Analytical Hierarchy Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-17, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Panagiotis K. Marhavilas & Michael G. Tegas & Georgios K. Koulinas & Dimitrios E. Koulouriotis, 2020. "A Joint Stochastic/Deterministic Process with Multi-Objective Decision Making Risk-Assessment Framework for Sustainable Constructions Engineering Projects—A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-21, May.
    2. Fotis Kitsios & Elpiniki Chatzidimitriou & Maria Kamariotou, 2023. "The ISO/IEC 27001 Information Security Management Standard: How to Extract Value from Data in the IT Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-17, March.
    3. Önder Çağlayan & Murat Aymelek, 2024. "An Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision Support Model for Sustainable Ship Queuing Policy Application via Vessel Traffic Service (VTS)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-33, May.
    4. Weiliang Qiao & Yu Liu & Xiaoxue Ma & Yang Liu, 2020. "Human Factors Analysis for Maritime Accidents Based on a Dynamic Fuzzy Bayesian Network," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(5), pages 957-980, May.
    5. Ping-Lung Huang & Bruce C.Y. Lee & Chen-Song Wang & Chi-Te Sun, 2017. "Relative Importance of the Factors under the ISO-10015 Quality Management Guidelines that Influence the Service Quality of Certification Bodies," Journal of Economics and Management, College of Business, Feng Chia University, Taiwan, vol. 13(1), pages 105-137, February.
    6. Junqiao Zhang & Xuebo Chen & Qiubai Sun, 2019. "A Safety Performance Assessment Framework for the Petroleum Industry’s Sustainable Development Based on FAHP-FCE and Human Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-20, June.
    7. Meng-Chuan Tsai & Chin-Tsai Lin, 2012. "Selecting an Optimal Region by Fuzzy Group Decision Making: Empirical Evidence from Medical Investors," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 399-416, May.
    8. Fakhradin Ghasemi & Mohammad Babamiri & Zahra Pashootan, 2022. "A comprehensive method for the quantification of medication error probability based on fuzzy SLIM," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(2), pages 1-17, February.
    9. G.K. Koulinas & O.E. Demesouka & P.K. Marhavilas & A.P. Vavatsikos & D.E. Koulouriotis, 2019. "Risk Assessment Using Fuzzy TOPSIS and PRAT for Sustainable Engineering Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15, January.
    10. Gavriil D. Chaitidis & Panagiotis K. Marhavilas & Venetis Kanakaris, 2022. "Potential Effects on Human Safety and Health from Infrasound and Audible Frequencies Generated by Vibrations of Diesel Engines Using Biofuel Blends at the Workplaces of Sustainable Engineering Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-23, June.
    11. Kandemir, Cagatay & Celik, Metin, 2021. "Determining the error producing conditions in marine engineering maintenance and operations through HFACS-MMO," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    12. Havle, Celal Alpay & Kılıç, Bilal, 2019. "A hybrid approach based on the fuzzy AHP and HFACS framework for identifying and analyzing gross navigation errors during transatlantic flights," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 21-30.
    13. Weiliang Qiao & Yang Liu & Xiaoxue Ma & He Lan, 2021. "Cognitive Gap and Correlation of Safety-I and Safety-II: A Case of Maritime Shipping Safety Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-24, May.
    14. Chandra Sekhar & Manoj Patwardhan & Rohit Kumar Singh, 2016. "Prioritising the dimensions of employee motivation using analytic hierarchy process," International Journal of Business and Emerging Markets, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(1), pages 49-66.
    15. Rahman, Shaikh Moksadur, 2020. "Relationship between Job Satisfaction and Turnover Intention: Evidence from Bangladesh," Asian Business Review, Asian Business Consortium, vol. 10(2), pages 99-108.
    16. Benyou Jia & Slobodan P. Simonovic & Pingan Zhong & Zhongbo Yu, 2016. "A Multi-Objective Best Compromise Decision Model for Real-Time Flood Mitigation Operations of Multi-Reservoir System," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(10), pages 3363-3387, August.
    17. Wang Kai, 2019. "Towards a Taxonomy of Idea Generation Techniques," Foundations of Management, Sciendo, vol. 11(1), pages 65-80, January.
    18. Bridgelall, Raj & Stubbing, Edward, 2021. "Forecasting the effects of autonomous vehicles on land use," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    19. Bevilacqua, Maurizio & Ciarapica, Filippo Emanuele, 2018. "Human factor risk management in the process industry: A case study," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 149-159.
    20. Naveena Prakasam & Louisa Huxtable-Thomas, 2021. "Reddit: Affordances as an Enabler for Shifting Loyalties," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 723-751, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:3:p:993-:d:314485. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.