IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i5p1245-d209329.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Elemental Composition and Flue Gas Emissions of Different Components from Five Semi-Arid Woody Species in Pyrolysed and Non-Pyrolysed Material

Author

Listed:
  • Maginot Ngangyo Heya

    (Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas (FCB), Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León (UANL), Av. Universidad s/n Cd. Universitaria, San Nicolás de los Garza 66451, Nuevo León, Mexico)

  • Rahim Foroughbakhch Pournavab

    (Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas (FCB), Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León (UANL), Av. Universidad s/n Cd. Universitaria, San Nicolás de los Garza 66451, Nuevo León, Mexico)

  • Artemio Carrillo Parra

    (Instituto de Silvicultura e Industria de la Madera (ISIMA), Universidad Juárez del Estado de Durango (UJED), Boulevard del Guadiana #501, Ciudad Universitaria, Torre de Investigación, Durango 34120, Mexico)

  • Volker Zelinski

    (Faculty of Resource Management, University of Applied Sciences and Arts (HAWK), Büsgenweg 1A, D-37077 Gottingen, Germany)

  • Lidia Rosaura Salas Cruz

    (Facultad de Agronomía (FA), Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León (UANL), Francisco Villa s/n, Col. Ex-Hacienda “El Canadá”, Escobedo 66050, Nuevo León, Mexico)

Abstract

Biofuels are sustainable alternatives to fossil fuels. However, they must comply with energy efficiency requirements and contribute to environmental protection. This study was focused on elemental composition (carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, sulphur and chlorine) of different plants’ components (stems, branches, twigs and leaves) from pyrolysed (charcoal) and non-pyrolysed samples of five semi-arid trees: Acacia berlandieri , A. wrightii , Ebenopsis ebano , Havardia pallens and Helietta parvifolia . Carbon fluctuated from 80.77% to 89.30% in charcoal and 44.99% to 49.70% in non-pyrolysed biomass, and hydrogen ranged from 2.38% to 2.69% in charcoal and 5.89% to 6.62% in non-pyrolysed biomass. Nitrogen accounted for 0.39%–0.65% (branches) and 0.32%–0.64% (stems) in charcoal, and the ranges for non-pyrolyzed material were 2.33–4.00% (leaves), 1.06%–1.76% (twigs), 0.21%–0.52% (branches) and 0.15%–0.28% (stems). Considerably higher concentrations of sulphur compared to chlorine were found, with increasing values for both elements from the base of trees to the leaves. Non-pyrolysed samples were characterized by 68.05 mg/kg–769.16 mg/kg (stems), 118.02 mg/kg–791.68 mg/kg (branches), 225.11 mg/kg–1742.25 mg/kg (twigs) and 374.73 mg/kg–6811.52 mg/kg (leaves) for sulphur, and 117.86 mg/kg–528.08 mg/kg (stems), 109.18 mg/kg–464.15 mg/kg (branches), 905.47 mg/kg–4205.19 mg/kg (twigs) and 2799.68 mg/kg–5072.76 mg/kg (leaves) for chlorine. In charcoal, the concentration ranges for sulphur were 47.54 mg/kg–376.95 mg/kg (branches) and 42.73–292.20 mg/kg (stems) and 139.34 mg/kg–419.68 mg/kg (branches) and 177.39 mg/kg–479.16 (stems) for chlorine. The study has shown that pyrolysis increased the amount of carbon and decreased the amount of hydrogen. Coincidentally, the amount of nitrogen, chlorine and sulphur could be decreased significantly by pyrolysis which means an improvement of the fuel considering the flue gas emissions. Besides the influence of the type of combustion plant and the influence of the source of biofuel, the treatment has a significant influence on the amount and composition of flue gases emitted in the combustion.

Suggested Citation

  • Maginot Ngangyo Heya & Rahim Foroughbakhch Pournavab & Artemio Carrillo Parra & Volker Zelinski & Lidia Rosaura Salas Cruz, 2019. "Elemental Composition and Flue Gas Emissions of Different Components from Five Semi-Arid Woody Species in Pyrolysed and Non-Pyrolysed Material," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-12, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:5:p:1245-:d:209329
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/5/1245/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/5/1245/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Esperanza Monedero & Juan José Hernández & Rocío Collado, 2017. "Combustion-Related Properties of Poplar, Willow and Black Locust to be used as Fuels in Power Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-11, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stolarski, Mariusz J. & Dudziec, Paweł & Krzyżaniak, Michał & Graban, Łukasz & Lajszner, Waldemar & Olba–Zięty, Ewelina, 2024. "How do key for the bioenergy industry properties of baled biomass change over two years of storage?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    2. José Antonio Soriano & Reyes García-Contreras & Antonio José Carpio de Los Pinos, 2021. "Study of the Thermochemical Properties of Lignocellulosic Biomass from Energy Crops," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-18, June.
    3. Paweł Stachowicz & Mariusz Jerzy Stolarski, 2022. "Thermophysical Properties and Elemental Composition of Black Locust, Poplar and Willow Biomass," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-16, December.
    4. Jadwiga Wyszkowska & Agata Borowik & Magdalena Zaborowska & Jan Kucharski, 2023. "Calorific Value of Zea mays Biomass Derived from Soil Contaminated with Chromium (VI) Disrupting the Soil’s Biochemical Properties," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-19, April.
    5. Alicja Kicińska & Grzegorz Caba, 2021. "Leaching of Chlorides, Sulphates, and Phosphates from Ashes Formed as a Result of Burning Conventional Fuels, Alternative Fuels, and Municipal Waste in Household Furnaces," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-18, June.
    6. Mariusz Jerzy Stolarski & Michał Krzyżaniak & Kazimierz Warmiński & Dariusz Załuski & Ewelina Olba-Zięty, 2020. "Willow Biomass as Energy Feedstock: The Effect of Habitat, Genotype and Harvest Rotation on Thermophysical Properties and Elemental Composition," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-17, August.
    7. Mariusz Jerzy Stolarski & Michał Krzyżaniak & Ewelina Olba-Zięty & Jakub Stolarski, 2023. "Changes in Commercial Dendromass Properties Depending on Type and Acquisition Time," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-20, December.
    8. Mariusz Jerzy Stolarski & Łukasz Gil & Michał Krzyżaniak & Ewelina Olba-Zięty & Ai-Min Wu, 2024. "Willow, Poplar, and Black Locust Debarked Wood as Feedstock for Energy and Other Purposes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-28, March.
    9. Mariusz Jerzy Stolarski & Natalia Wojciechowska & Mateusz Seliwiak & Tomasz Krzysztof Dobrzański, 2024. "Properties of Forest Tree Branches as an Energy Feedstock in North-Eastern Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-18, April.
    10. Esperanza Monedero & Henar Portero & Magín Lapuerta, 2018. "Combustion of Poplar and Pine Pellet Blends in a 50 kW Domestic Boiler: Emissions and Combustion Efficiency," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-17, June.
    11. Krzysztof Mudryk & Marcin Jewiarz & Marek Wróbel & Marcin Niemiec & Arkadiusz Dyjakon, 2021. "Evaluation of Urban Tree Leaf Biomass-Potential, Physico-Mechanical and Chemical Parameters of Raw Material and Solid Biofuel," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-14, February.
    12. Mariusz Jerzy Stolarski & Kazimierz Warmiński & Michał Krzyżaniak, 2020. "Energy Value of Yield and Biomass Quality of Poplar Grown in Two Consecutive 4-Year Harvest Rotations in the North-East of Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-13, March.
    13. Mariusz Jerzy Stolarski & Stefan Szczukowski & Michał Krzyżaniak & Józef Tworkowski, 2020. "Energy Value of Yield and Biomass Quality in a 7-Year Rotation of Willow Cultivated on Marginal Soil," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-12, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:5:p:1245-:d:209329. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.