IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i24p7099-d296730.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Connectivity and Accessibility of the Railway Network in China: Guidance for Spatial Balanced Development

Author

Listed:
  • Jing Fan

    (The Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering, Ministry of Education, Shanghai 201804, China
    College of Transportation Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China)

  • Ye Li

    (The Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering, Ministry of Education, Shanghai 201804, China
    College of Transportation Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China)

  • Yu Zhang

    (The Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering, Ministry of Education, Shanghai 201804, China
    College of Transportation Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China)

  • Xiao Luo

    (The Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering, Ministry of Education, Shanghai 201804, China
    College of Transportation Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China)

  • Changxi Ma

    (Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, China)

Abstract

Good connectivity and accessibility help to enhance the competitiveness of regions and countries. This research provides a detailed analysis of the connectivity and accessibility of the Chinese railway network. The studied period starts in 1949 and ends in 2017. The research scope covers the railway system of the entire country (except Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Macao). Instead of focusing on main cities as research objects, this paper provides more detailed insights by using counties as the basic research units. The analysis shows that the achieved connectivity has been increasing continuously over the study period. Four accessibility indicators (temporal location indicator, weighted average travel time, daily accessibility, and potential indicator) provide comprehensive and complementary results, indicating that the most accessible cities and units are located in the southeastern part of the Hu line. In addition, higher economic level, or higher population density, is correlated with higher accessibility. Furthermore, the current network exhibits an unbalanced spatial distribution pattern, with an underdeveloped west. All the indicators show that the accessibility of the northwest and southwest regions is the lowest. Based on these conclusions, regional policy-making suggestions can be made to guide a rational railway network expansion and facilitate the equality and sustainable economic development of regions. The future railway system development is suggested to focus more on enhancing inner and inter-region communication in the west of China and attach importance to poverty-stricken counties in support of balanced regional growth and development. The railway development of the eastern regions needs to focus on optimizing the structure of the network as well as reasonably organizing railway routes.

Suggested Citation

  • Jing Fan & Ye Li & Yu Zhang & Xiao Luo & Changxi Ma, 2019. "Connectivity and Accessibility of the Railway Network in China: Guidance for Spatial Balanced Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-18, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:24:p:7099-:d:296730
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/24/7099/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/24/7099/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhenhua Chen & Kingsley E. Haynes, 2015. "Public surface transportation and regional output: A spatial panel approach," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 94(4), pages 727-751, November.
    2. R W Vickerman, 1974. "Accessibility, Attraction, and Potential: A Review of Some Concepts and Their Use in Determining Mobility," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 6(6), pages 675-691, December.
    3. Kotavaara, Ossi & Antikainen, Harri & Rusanen, Jarmo, 2011. "Population change and accessibility by road and rail networks: GIS and statistical approach to Finland 1970–2007," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 926-935.
    4. Lvhua Wang & Yongxue Liu & Liang Mao & Chao Sun, 2018. "Potential Impacts of China 2030 High-Speed Rail Network on Ground Transportation Accessibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-16, April.
    5. E Talen & L Anselin, 1998. "Assessing Spatial Equity: An Evaluation of Measures of Accessibility to Public Playgrounds," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 30(4), pages 595-613, April.
    6. Yuan Gao & Qingsong He & Yaolin Liu & Lingyu Zhang & Haofeng Wang & Enxiang Cai, 2016. "Imbalance in Spatial Accessibility to Primary and Secondary Schools in China: Guidance for Education Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-16, November.
    7. Shicheng Li & Jian Gong & Qinghai Deng & Tianyu Zhou, 2018. "Impacts of the Qinghai–Tibet Railway on Accessibility and Economic Linkage of the Third Pole," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-17, October.
    8. Chen, Chia-Lin, 2012. "Reshaping Chinese space-economy through high-speed trains: opportunities and challenges," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 312-316.
    9. Wang, Jiaoe & Jin, Fengjun & Mo, Huihui & Wang, Fahui, 2009. "Spatiotemporal evolution of China's railway network in the 20th century: An accessibility approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 43(8), pages 765-778, October.
    10. S L Handy & D A Niemeier, 1997. "Measuring Accessibility: An Exploration of Issues and Alternatives," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 29(7), pages 1175-1194, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yuejiao Lv & Yajuan Chen, 2022. "Research on the Evolution Characteristics and Synergistic Relationship between HSR Network and Economic Network in Hubei Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-25, July.
    2. Xiaoyi Xie & Peiji Shi, 2023. "Dynamic Evolution and Collaborative Development Model of Urban Agglomeration in Hexi Corridor from the Perspective of Economic Flow," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-20, January.
    3. Jing Fan & Hironori Kato & Xinghua Liu & Ye Li & Changxi Ma & Liang Zhou & Mingzhang Liang, 2022. "High-Speed Railway Network Development, Inter-County Accessibility Improvements, and Regional Poverty Alleviation: Evidence from China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-22, October.
    4. Rui Ding & Jun Fu & Yiming Du & Linyu Du & Tao Zhou & Yilin Zhang & Siwei Shen & Yuqi Zhu & Shihui Chen, 2022. "Structural Evolution and Community Detection of China Rail Transit Route Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-19, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cao, Jing & Liu, Xiaoyue Cathy & Wang, Yinhai & Li, Qingquan, 2013. "Accessibility impacts of China’s high-speed rail network," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 12-21.
    2. Vandenbulcke, Grégory & Steenberghen, Thérèse & Thomas, Isabelle, 2009. "Mapping accessibility in Belgium: a tool for land-use and transport planning?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 39-53.
    3. Ottensmann, John R. & Lindsey, Greg, 2008. "A Use-Based Measure of Accessibility to Linear Features to Predict Urban Trail Use," The Journal of Transport and Land Use, Center for Transportation Studies, University of Minnesota, vol. 1(1), pages 41-63.
    4. Wang, Lvhua & Liu, Yongxue & Sun, Chao & Liu, Yahui, 2016. "Accessibility impact of the present and future high-speed rail network: A case study of Jiangsu Province, China," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 161-172.
    5. Wenjie Wu & Yutian Liang & Di Wu, 2016. "Evaluating the Impact of China’s Rail Network Expansions on Local Accessibility: A Market Potential Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-11, May.
    6. Jiao, Jingjuan & Wang, Jiaoe & Jin, Fengjun & Dunford, Michael, 2014. "Impacts on accessibility of China’s present and future HSR network," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 123-132.
    7. Dong, Xiaojing & Ben-Akiva, Moshe E. & Bowman, John L. & Walker, Joan L., 2006. "Moving from trip-based to activity-based measures of accessibility," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 163-180, February.
    8. José Manuel Naranjo Gómez, 2016. "Impacts on the Social Cohesion of Mainland Spain’s Future Motorway and High-Speed Rail Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-22, July.
    9. Hasnine, Md Sami & Graovac, Ana & Camargo, Felipe & Habib, Khandker Nurul, 2019. "A random utility maximization (RUM) based measure of accessibility to transit: Accurate capturing of the first-mile issue in urban transit," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 313-320.
    10. Pokharel, Ramesh & Bertolini, Luca & te Brömmelstroet, Marco & Acharya, Surya Raj, 2021. "Spatio-temporal evolution of cities and regional economic development in Nepal: Does transport infrastructure matter?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    11. Ahmed El-Geneidy & David Levinson, 2011. "Place Rank: Valuing Spatial Interactions," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 11(4), pages 643-659, December.
    12. Zhang Weiyang & Derudder Ben, 2016. "Approximating actual flows in physical infrastructure networks: the case of the Yangtze River Delta high-speed railway network," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 31(31), pages 145-160, March.
    13. Cascetta, Ennio & Cartenì, Armando & Montanino, Marcello, 2016. "A behavioral model of accessibility based on the number of available opportunities," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 45-58.
    14. Houde, Maxime & Apparicio, Philippe & Séguin, Anne-Marie, 2018. "A ride for whom: Has cycling network expansion reduced inequities in accessibility in Montreal, Canada?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 9-21.
    15. Wang, Lei & Yuan, Feng & Duan, Xuejun, 2018. "How high-speed rail service development influenced commercial land market dynamics: A case study of Jiangsu province, China," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 248-257.
    16. Rosik, Piotr & Stępniak, Marcin & Komornicki, Tomasz, 2015. "The decade of the big push to roads in Poland: Impact on improvement in accessibility and territorial cohesion from a policy perspective," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 134-146.
    17. Lvhua Wang & Yongxue Liu & Liang Mao & Chao Sun, 2018. "Potential Impacts of China 2030 High-Speed Rail Network on Ground Transportation Accessibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-16, April.
    18. Gao, Deng & Li, Shicheng, 2022. "Spatiotemporal impact of railway network in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau on accessibility and economic linkages during 1984–2030," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    19. Blair, Neale & Hine, Julian & Bukhari, Syed Murtaza Asghar, 2013. "Analysing the impact of network change on transport disadvantage: a GIS-based case study of Belfast," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 192-200.
    20. Ruben Cordera & Pierluigi Coppola & Luigi dell’Olio & Ángel Ibeas, 2017. "Is accessibility relevant in trip generation? Modelling the interaction between trip generation and accessibility taking into account spatial effects," Transportation, Springer, vol. 44(6), pages 1577-1603, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:24:p:7099-:d:296730. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.