IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v256y2019ics0306261919316472.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Potential energy recovery by integrating an ORC in a biogas plant

Author

Listed:
  • Baccioli, Andrea
  • Ferrari, Lorenzo
  • Vizza, Francesco
  • Desideri, Umberto

Abstract

An increasing interest is devoted to biogas plants as they might play a key role in the reduction of current fossil fuel consumption for power production. The main component of the plant is the anaerobic digester where the organic fraction of waste products is converted in a gas with high concentration of methane and carbon dioxide. This biogas is converted in power and heat in a cogeneration unit that may consist in a micro gas turbine or an internal combustion engine. A portion of the heat is used to keep the digester at a constant temperature as requested by the anaerobic digestion, the reaming is generally dissipated. An Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) can be adopted to increase thermal energy recovery and increase the power produced by the plant. This study focuses on the potential improvements of an anaerobic digestion plant when a commercial (ORC) is adopted as an additional thermal user to reduce the amount of dissipated heat and increase the power production. The study is based on an existing biogas plant operating in the town of Viareggio (Italy) which will be equipped with a 600kWe micro gas turbine. The integration of the two systems was studied in detail by investigating the plant modifications, which are necessary to reach high values of thermal energy recovery. A reference and a modified solution were simulated in AMESim by considering a yearlong period with actual ambient conditions. Three different commercial size for ORC (30, 40 and 50 kW) were considered to determine the most suitable from the thermodynamic and economic point of view. A sensitivity analysis on the sludge regenerator, which recovers part of the heat from the digestate to preheat the sludge entering in the plant, was carried out showing a strong increase in the ORC performance with the size of the sludge regenerator. The larger was the ORC size, the larger should be the sludge regenerator to increase system efficiency and avoid winter shutdown. The economic analysis showed that profitability index was maximum for the 30 kW ORC, due to the inefficiency of a larger size during winter, while the most remunerable solution was the 40 kW configuration, due to the larger amount of energy produced during the year.

Suggested Citation

  • Baccioli, Andrea & Ferrari, Lorenzo & Vizza, Francesco & Desideri, Umberto, 2019. "Potential energy recovery by integrating an ORC in a biogas plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:256:y:2019:i:c:s0306261919316472
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113960
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261919316472
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113960?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Huster, Wolfgang R. & Vaupel, Yannic & Mhamdi, Adel & Mitsos, Alexander, 2018. "Validated dynamic model of an organic Rankine cycle (ORC) for waste heat recovery in a diesel truck," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 647-661.
    2. Bruno, Joan Carles & Ortega-López, Víctor & Coronas, Alberto, 2009. "Integration of absorption cooling systems into micro gas turbine trigeneration systems using biogas: Case study of a sewage treatment plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(6), pages 837-847, June.
    3. Scarlat, Nicolae & Dallemand, Jean-François & Fahl, Fernando, 2018. "Biogas: Developments and perspectives in Europe," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(PA), pages 457-472.
    4. Gazda, Wiesław & Stanek, Wojciech, 2016. "Energy and environmental assessment of integrated biogas trigeneration and photovoltaic plant as more sustainable industrial system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 138-149.
    5. Sunhee Kim & Taehong Sung & Kyung Chun Kim, 2017. "Thermodynamic Performance Analysis of a Biogas-Fuelled Micro-Gas Turbine with a Bottoming Organic Rankine Cycle for Sewage Sludge and Food Waste Treatment Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-22, February.
    6. Lecompte, Steven & Huisseune, Henk & van den Broek, Martijn & Vanslambrouck, Bruno & De Paepe, Michel, 2015. "Review of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) architectures for waste heat recovery," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 448-461.
    7. Pöschl, Martina & Ward, Shane & Owende, Philip, 2010. "Evaluation of energy efficiency of various biogas production and utilization pathways," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(11), pages 3305-3321, November.
    8. Yağlı, Hüseyin & Koç, Yıldız & Koç, Ali & Görgülü, Adnan & Tandiroğlu, Ahmet, 2016. "Parametric optimization and exergetic analysis comparison of subcritical and supercritical organic Rankine cycle (ORC) for biogas fuelled combined heat and power (CHP) engine exhaust gas waste heat," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 923-932.
    9. Xu, Bin & Rathod, Dhruvang & Yebi, Adamu & Filipi, Zoran & Onori, Simona & Hoffman, Mark, 2019. "A comprehensive review of organic rankine cycle waste heat recovery systems in heavy-duty diesel engine applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 145-170.
    10. Gómez Aláez, S.L. & Bombarda, P. & Invernizzi, C.M. & Iora, P. & Silva, P., 2015. "Evaluation of ORC modules performance adopting commercial plastic heat exchangers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 882-890.
    11. Jiménez-Arreola, Manuel & Pili, Roberto & Wieland, Christoph & Romagnoli, Alessandro, 2018. "Analysis and comparison of dynamic behavior of heat exchangers for direct evaporation in ORC waste heat recovery applications from fluctuating sources," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 724-740.
    12. Alberto Benato & Alarico Macor, 2017. "Biogas Engine Waste Heat Recovery Using Organic Rankine Cycle," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, March.
    13. Hakawati, Rawan & Smyth, Beatrice M. & McCullough, Geoffrey & De Rosa, Fabio & Rooney, David, 2017. "What is the most energy efficient route for biogas utilization: Heat, electricity or transport?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 1076-1087.
    14. Lantz, Mikael, 2012. "The economic performance of combined heat and power from biogas produced from manure in Sweden – A comparison of different CHP technologies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 502-511.
    15. Baccioli, A. & Antonelli, M. & Desideri, U., 2017. "Technical and economic analysis of organic flash regenerative cycles (OFRCs) for low temperature waste heat recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 69-87.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Al-Dahidi, Sameer & Alrbai, Mohammad & Al-Ghussain, Loiy & Alahmer, Ali, 2024. "Maximizing energy efficiency in wastewater treatment plants: A data-driven approach for waste heat recovery and an economic analysis using Organic Rankine Cycle and thermal energy storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 362(C).
    2. Bedoić, Robert & Dorotić, Hrvoje & Schneider, Daniel Rolph & Čuček, Lidija & Ćosić, Boris & Pukšec, Tomislav & Duić, Neven, 2021. "Synergy between feedstock gate fee and power-to-gas: An energy and economic analysis of renewable methane production in a biogas plant," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 12-23.
    3. Zhang, Yi-Fan & Li, Ming-Jia & Ren, Xiao & Duan, Xin-Yue & Wu, Chia-Jung & Xi, Huan & Feng, Yong-Qiang & Gong, Liang & Hung, Tzu-Chen, 2022. "Effect of heat source supplies on system behaviors of ORCs with different capacities: An experimental comparison between the 3 kW and 10 kW unit," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PB).
    4. Gianluca Caposciutti & Andrea Baccioli & Lorenzo Ferrari & Umberto Desideri, 2020. "Biogas from Anaerobic Digestion: Power Generation or Biomethane Production?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-15, February.
    5. Shi, Yao & Zhang, Zhiming & Xie, Lei & Wu, Xialai & Liu, Xueqin Amy & Lu, Shan & Su, Hongye, 2022. "Modified hierarchical strategy for transient performance improvement of the ORC based waste heat recovery system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PA).
    6. Wang, Likun & Bliznakov, Stoyan & Isseroff, Rebecca & Zhou, Yuchen & Zuo, Xianghao & Raut, Aniket & Wang, Wanhua & Cuiffo, Michael & Kim, Taejin & Rafailovich, Miriam H., 2020. "Enhancing proton exchange membrane fuel cell performance via graphene oxide surface synergy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrea Baccioli & Lorenzo Ferrari & Romain Guiller & Oumayma Yousfi & Francesco Vizza & Umberto Desideri, 2019. "Feasibility Analysis of Bio-Methane Production in a Biogas Plant: A Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-16, February.
    2. Pei Lu & Zheng Liang & Xianglong Luo & Yangkai Xia & Jin Wang & Kaihuang Chen & Yingzong Liang & Jianyong Chen & Zhi Yang & Jiacheng He & Ying Chen, 2023. "Design and Optimization of Organic Rankine Cycle Based on Heat Transfer Enhancement and Novel Heat Exchanger: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-34, January.
    3. Maghanaki, M. Mohammadi & Ghobadian, B. & Najafi, G. & Galogah, R. Janzadeh, 2013. "Potential of biogas production in Iran," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 702-714.
    4. Sunhee Kim & Taehong Sung & Kyung Chun Kim, 2017. "Thermodynamic Performance Analysis of a Biogas-Fuelled Micro-Gas Turbine with a Bottoming Organic Rankine Cycle for Sewage Sludge and Food Waste Treatment Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-22, February.
    5. Arslan, Muhammed & Yılmaz, Ceyhun, 2022. "Thermodynamic Optimization and Thermoeconomic Evaluation of Afyon Biogas Plant assisted by organic Rankine Cycle for waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    6. Yıldız Koç & Hüseyin Yağlı & Ali Koç, 2019. "Exergy Analysis and Performance Improvement of a Subcritical/Supercritical Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) for Exhaust Gas Waste Heat Recovery in a Biogas Fuelled Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Engine Thro," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-22, February.
    7. Li, Xiaoya & Xu, Bin & Tian, Hua & Shu, Gequn, 2021. "Towards a novel holistic design of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) systems operating under heat source fluctuations and intermittency," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    8. Gazda, Wiesław & Stanek, Wojciech, 2016. "Energy and environmental assessment of integrated biogas trigeneration and photovoltaic plant as more sustainable industrial system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 138-149.
    9. Ramírez-Arpide, Félix Rafael & Espinosa-Solares, Teodoro & Gallegos-Vázquez, Clemente & Santoyo-Cortés, Vinicio Horacio, 2019. "Bioenergy production from nopal cladodes and dairy cow manure on a farm-scale level: Challenges for its economic feasibility in Mexico," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 383-392.
    10. Chatzopoulou, Maria Anna & Markides, Christos N., 2018. "Thermodynamic optimisation of a high-electrical efficiency integrated internal combustion engine – Organic Rankine cycle combined heat and power system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 1229-1251.
    11. Kamila Klimek & Magdalena Kapłan & Serhiy Syrotyuk & Nikolay Bakach & Nikolay Kapustin & Ryszard Konieczny & Jakub Dobrzyński & Kinga Borek & Dorota Anders & Barbara Dybek & Agnieszka Karwacka & Grzeg, 2021. "Investment Model of Agricultural Biogas Plants for Individual Farms in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-30, November.
    12. Su, Bosheng & Han, Wei & Zhang, Xiaosong & Chen, Yi & Wang, Zefeng & Jin, Hongguang, 2018. "Assessment of a combined cooling, heating and power system by synthetic use of biogas and solar energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 922-935.
    13. Shi, Yao & Zhang, Zhiming & Chen, Xiaoqiang & Xie, Lei & Liu, Xueqin & Su, Hongye, 2023. "Data-Driven model identification and efficient MPC via quasi-linear parameter varying representation for ORC waste heat recovery system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    14. Huang, Zhi & Su, Bosheng & Wang, Yilin & Yuan, Shuo & Huang, Yupeng & Li, Liang & Cai, Jiahao & Chen, Zhiqiang, 2024. "A novel biogas-driven CCHP system based on chemical reinjection," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 297(C).
    15. Herz, Gregor & Reichelt, Erik & Jahn, Matthias, 2017. "Design and evaluation of a Fischer-Tropsch process for the production of waxes from biogas," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 370-381.
    16. Su, Bosheng & Han, Wei & Jin, Hongguang, 2017. "Proposal and assessment of a novel integrated CCHP system with biogas steam reforming using solar energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 1-11.
    17. Nur Izzah Hamna A. Aziz & Marlia M. Hanafiah & Shabbir H. Gheewala & Haikal Ismail, 2020. "Bioenergy for a Cleaner Future: A Case Study of Sustainable Biogas Supply Chain in the Malaysian Energy Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-24, April.
    18. Rawan Hakawati & Beatrice Smyth & Helen Daly & Geoffrey McCullough & David Rooney, 2019. "Is the Fischer-Tropsch Conversion of Biogas-Derived Syngas to Liquid Fuels Feasible at Atmospheric Pressure?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-28, March.
    19. Mehta, Neha & Anderson, Aine & Johnston, Christopher R. & Rooney, David W., 2022. "Evaluating the opportunity for utilising anaerobic digestion and pyrolysis of livestock manure and grass silage to decarbonise gas infrastructure: A Northern Ireland case study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 343-357.
    20. Francis Kemausuor & Muyiwa S. Adaramola & John Morken, 2018. "A Review of Commercial Biogas Systems and Lessons for Africa," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-21, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:256:y:2019:i:c:s0306261919316472. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.