IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i21p5927-d280061.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Fuzzy Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) of the Agricultural Cooperatives from South East Region of Romania

Author

Listed:
  • Andrei-Mirel Florea

    (The School for Doctoral Studies in Engineering, “Dunărea de Jos” University of Galati, 800001 Galati, Romania)

  • Florentin Bercu

    (Union of the National Branch of Crop Sector Cooperatives, 020491 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Riana Iren Radu

    (Departament of Business Administration, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, “Dunărea de Jos” University of Galati, 800001 Galati, Romania)

  • Silvius Stanciu

    (Center for Technology Transfer, “Dunărea de Jos” University of Galati, 800001 Galati, Romania)

Abstract

The need for Romanian agriculture development by efficient usage of resources and a rural environment has led to the establishment of agricultural cooperatives. Romania needs strong cooperatives and, in order to achieve this, the involvement of not only the authorities and agricultural producers, but also of each inhabitant from the rural area, is required. In the context of food market saturation with import products, it is necessary to revive the Romanian market in order to supply natural and quality products. A total of 1425 agricultural cooperatives were registered in Romania at the end of 2018, out of which 57% did not submit the Balance Sheet. The research performed within the study proposes the usage of fsQCA analysis in order to assess some conditions considered by us essential for the sustainability of the agricultural cooperatives. These conditions are represented by the initial contribution of the members, by the existence of a central collection space, by the employment of a manager, by the knowledge of the members on the development possibilities, and by the involvement of the members within the cooperative’s activity. The study highlights the fact that the absence of the conditions presented leads to the absence of a sustainable cooperative. We consider the dissolution of the cooperatives pertinent, which has not developed an activity for more than three years from their establishment and the publication on the MADR website of the National Registry of Cooperatives, which will offer a true image on the prosperity and viability of these types of entities.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrei-Mirel Florea & Florentin Bercu & Riana Iren Radu & Silvius Stanciu, 2019. "A Fuzzy Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) of the Agricultural Cooperatives from South East Region of Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-18, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:21:p:5927-:d:280061
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/21/5927/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/21/5927/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ahmad Bello, Dogarawa, 2005. "The Role of Cooperative Societies in Economic Development," MPRA Paper 23161, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2005.
    2. Silvius Stanciu & Cezar Bichescu & Alexandru Căpățînă & George-Bogdan Drăgan & Andrei-Mirel Florea, 2018. "Enablers and inhibitors of collaborative network development in organic food industry: A fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA)," Contemporary Economics, University of Economics and Human Sciences in Warsaw., vol. 12(4), December.
    3. Silvius Stanciu & Monica Laura Zlati & Valentin Marian Antohi & Cezar Ionut Bichescu, 2019. "The Development Analysis of the Romanian Traditional Product Market Based on the Performance Model for Sustainable Economic Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-27, February.
    4. Pavel Ciaian & d’Artis Kancs & Johan Swinnen, 2010. "EU Land Markets and the Common Agricultural Policy," Journal of Economics and Econometrics, Economics and Econometrics Society, vol. 53(3), pages 1-31.
    5. Andrei-Mirel Florea & Alexandru Capatina & Riana Iren Radu & Constanța Serban (Bacanu) & Madalina Georgiana Boboc & Cristina Stoica (Dinca) & Mihaela Munteanu (Pila) & Iuliana Manuela Ion (Dumitriu) &, 2019. "Limiting Factors that Influence the Formation of Producer Groups in the South-East Region of Romania: A Fuzzy Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-14, March.
    6. Yang, Huan & Klerkx, Laurens & Leeuwis, Cees, 2014. "Functions and limitations of farmer cooperatives as innovation intermediaries: Findings from China," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 115-125.
    7. Gert van Dijk & Panagiota Sergaki & George Baourakis, 2019. "The Cooperative Enterprise," Cooperative Management, Springer, number 978-3-030-16279-5, December.
    8. Mahlon G. Lang, 1995. "The Future of Agricultural Cooperatives in Canada and the United States: Discussion," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 77(5), pages 1162-1165.
    9. Nair, Lakshmi Balachandran & Gibbert, Michael, 2016. "Analyzing inconsistent cases in Management fsQCA studies: A methodological manifesto," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(4), pages 1464-1470.
    10. Donald M. Houessou & Ben G. J. S. Sonneveld & Augustin K. N. Aoudji & Frejus S. Thoto & Smith A. R. Dossou & Denyse J. R. M. Snelder & Anselme A. Adegbidi & Tjard De Cock Buning, 2019. "How to Transition from Cooperations to Cooperatives: A Case Study of the Factors Impacting the Organization of Urban Gardeners in Benin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-25, August.
    11. Constantine ILIOPOULOS, 2013. "Public Policy Support For Agricultural Cooperatives: An Organizational Economics Approach," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 84(3), pages 241-252, September.
    12. Bercu, Florentin, 2014. "Evolution of agricultural cooperatives in Romania in 2014," MPRA Paper 61757, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Constantine Iliopoulos & George Hendrikse, 2009. "Influence Costs in Agribusiness Cooperatives," International Studies of Management & Organization, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(4), pages 60-80, January.
    14. Achilleas Kontogeorgos & Panagiota Sergaki & Anastasia Kosma & Vassiliki Semou, 2018. "Organizational Models for Agricultural Cooperatives: Empirical Evidence for their Performance," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 9(4), pages 1123-1137, December.
    15. Liang, Qiao & Huang, Zuhui & Lu, Haiyang & Wang, Xinxin, 2015. "Social Capital, Member Participation, and Cooperative Performance: Evidence from China’s Zhejiang," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 18(1), pages 1-30, February.
    16. Dan Kahan, "undated". "The Logic of Reciprocity: Trust, Collective Action, and Law," Yale Law School John M. Olin Center for Studies in Law, Economics, and Public Policy Working Paper Series yale_lepp-1007, Yale Law School John M. Olin Center for Studies in Law, Economics, and Public Policy.
    17. Ragin, Charles C., 2006. "Set Relations in Social Research: Evaluating Their Consistency and Coverage," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(3), pages 291-310, July.
    18. Michael L. Cook, 1995. "The Future of U.S. Agricultural Cooperatives: A Neo-Institutional Approach," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 77(5), pages 1153-1159.
    19. Romeo Victor Ionescu & Monica Laura Zlati & Valentin Marian Antohi & Silvius Stanciu, 2018. "Reduced Inequalities as Factor of Sustainable Development: The Analysis Under Econometric Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-23, September.
    20. Michael L. Cook, 2018. "A Life Cycle Explanation of Cooperative Longevity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-20, May.
    21. Poulton, Colin & Dorward, Andrew & Kydd, Jonathan, 2010. "The Future of Small Farms: New Directions for Services, Institutions, and Intermediation," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 38(10), pages 1413-1428, October.
    22. Eduard Gabriel Ceptureanu & Sebastian Ion Ceptureanu & Violeta Radulescu & Stefan Alexandru Ionescu, 2018. "What Makes Coopetition Successful? An Inter-Organizational Side Analysis on Coopetition Critical Success Factors in Oil and Gas Distribution Networks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-20, December.
    23. Teresa Nelson & Dylan Nelson & Benjamin Huybrechts & Frédéric Dufays & Noreen O'Shea & Giorgia Trasciani, 2016. "Emergent identity formation and the co-operative : theory building in relation to alternative organizational forms," Post-Print hal-02312324, HAL.
    24. Kostas Karantininis, 2007. "The Network Form of the Cooperative Organization," Springer Books, in: Vertical Markets and Cooperative Hierarchies, chapter 0, pages 19-34, Springer.
    25. Jarka Chloupkova & Gunnar Svendsen & Gert Svendsen, 2003. "Building and destroying social capital: The case of cooperative movements in Denmark and Poland," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 20(3), pages 241-252, September.
    26. Teresa Nelson & Dylan Nelson & Benjamin Huybrechts & Frédéric Dufays & Noreen O’Shea & Giorgia Trasciani, 2016. "Emergent identity formation and the co-operative: theory building in relation to alternative organizational forms," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(3-4), pages 286-309, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daniel Kaimann & Joe Cox, 2021. "A Comparative Analysis of Consumption: Evidence from a Cultural Goods Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-21, November.
    2. Evangelia Krassadaki & Constantin Zopounidis & Christos Lemonakis, 2022. "Α fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis Approach for the evaluation of corporate viability," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 3549-3570, September.
    3. Pau Sendra-Pons & Sara Belarbi-Muñoz & Dolores Garzón & Alicia Mas-Tur, 2022. "Cross-country differences in drivers of female necessity entrepreneurship," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 16(4), pages 971-989, December.
    4. Monica Laura Zlati & Andrei Mirel Florea & Valentin Marian Antohi & Marius Sorin Dinca & Florentin Bercu & Costinela Fortea & Stanciu Silvius, 2023. "Financing Romanian Agricultural Cooperatives’ Investments for the 2023–2027 Horizon," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-28, January.
    5. Ionuț-Adrian Drăguleasa & Amalia Niță & Mirela Mazilu & Gheorghe Curcan, 2023. "Spatio-Temporal Distribution and Trends of Major Agricultural Crops in Romania Using Interactive Geographic Information System Mapping," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-25, October.
    6. Romeo Victor Ionescu & Monica Laura Zlati & Valentin Marian Antohi & Silvius Stanciu & Florina Oana Virlanuta & Cristina (Băcanu) Serban, 2020. "New Agricultural Model of Economic Sustainability for Wheat Seed Production in Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-21, May.
    7. Oana Diana LUPOAE & Riana Iren RADU & Rodica PRIPOAIE, 2019. "Aspects Regarding the Possibility of Increasing the Performance of the Organization by Motivating Human Resources (HR)," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 3, pages 22-27.
    8. Jasper Grashuis & Florentin Bercu & Andrei‐Mirel Florea & Riana Iren Radu, 2024. "The commercial growth of farmer cooperatives in Romania: A double‐hurdle model analysis," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 95(1), pages 113-127, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Constantine Iliopoulos & Vladislav Valentinov, 2018. "Member Heterogeneity in Agricultural Cooperatives: A Systems-Theoretic Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-22, April.
    2. Iliopoulos, Constantine & Valentinov, Vladislav, 2018. "Member heterogeneity in agricultural cooperatives: A systems-theoretic perspective," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 10(4), pages 1-22.
    3. Erika Ribašauskienė & Diana Šumylė & Artiom Volkov & Tomas Baležentis & Dalia Streimikiene & Mangirdas Morkunas, 2019. "Evaluating Public Policy Support for Agricultural Cooperatives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-15, July.
    4. Theo Benos & Nikos Kalogeras & Martin Wetzels & Ko De Ruyter & Joost M. E. Pennings, 2018. "Harnessing a ‘Currency Matrix’ for Performance Measurement in Cooperatives: A Multi-Phased Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-38, December.
    5. Niyazmetov, Davron & Soliev, Ilkhom & Theesfeld, Insa, 2021. "Ordered to volunteer? Institutional compatibility assessment of establishing agricultural cooperatives in Uzbekistan," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    6. Wendong Deng & George Hendrikse & Qiao Liang, 2021. "Internal social capital and the life cycle of agricultural cooperatives," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 301-323, January.
    7. Murillo Vetroni Barros & Rômulo Henrique Gomes Jesus & Bruno Silva Ribeiro & Cassiano Moro Piekarski, 2023. "Going in Circles: Key Aspects for Circular Economy Contributions to Agro-industrial Cooperatives," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 861-880, June.
    8. Jan Falkowski & Pavel Ciaian, 2016. "Factors Supporting the Development of Producer Organizations and their Impacts in the Light of Ongoing Changes in Food Supply Chains: A Literature Review," JRC Research Reports JRC101617, Joint Research Centre.
    9. Jos BIJMAN & Markus HANISCH, 2020. "Understanding the heterogeneity among agricultural cooperatives," CIRIEC Working Papers 2013, CIRIEC - Université de Liège.
    10. Annemarie Groot-Kormelinck & Jos Bijman & Jacques Trienekens & Laurens Klerkx, 2022. "Producer organizations as transition intermediaries? Insights from organic and conventional vegetable systems in Uruguay," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(4), pages 1277-1300, December.
    11. Wolz, Axel & Möllers, Judith & Micu, Marius Mihai, 2020. "Options for agricultural service cooperatives in a postsocialist economy: Evidence from Romania," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 49(1), pages 57-65.
    12. Liyan Yu & Jerker Nilsson, 2019. "Social Capital and Financial Capital in Chinese Cooperatives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-15, April.
    13. Isaac Zúñiga Aguilar, 2022. "Neuroeconomics in Cooperatives: Hierarchy of Emotional Patterns in the Collective Decision-Making Process for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-31, June.
    14. Matias Ramirez & Ian Clarke & Laurens Klerkx, 2018. "Analysing intermediary organisations and their influence on upgrading in emerging agricultural clusters," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 50(6), pages 1314-1335, September.
    15. Feifei Chen & Zhigang Xu & Yufeng Luo, 2023. "False prosperity: Rethinking government support for farmers’ cooperatives in China," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 94(3), pages 905-920, September.
    16. Jason R. V. Franken & Michael L. Cook, 2019. "Do Corporate Governance Recommendations Apply to U.S. Agricultural Cooperatives?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-16, September.
    17. Jasper Grashuis, 2018. "An Exploratory Study of Cooperative Survival: Strategic Adaptation to External Developments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-15, February.
    18. Franken, Jason & Cook, Michael L., 2022. "Cooperatives’ Role in Farm Risk Management," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322116, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    19. Marian Socoliuc & Cristina-Gabriela Cosmulese & Marius-Sorin Ciubotariu & Svetlana Mihaila & Iulia-Diana Arion & Veronica Grosu, 2020. "Sustainability Reporting as a Mixture of CSR and Sustainable Development. A Model for Micro-Enterprises within the Romanian Forestry Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-34, January.
    20. Clarke, Ian & Klerkx, Laurens & Ramirez, Matias, 2016. "Learning and innovation in developing economy clusters: Comparing private and non-profit intermediaries in cluster governance," Greenwich Papers in Political Economy 16712, University of Greenwich, Greenwich Political Economy Research Centre.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:21:p:5927-:d:280061. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.