IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i19p5281-d270701.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of Prediction Accuracy under the Selection of Optimum Time Granularity in Different Metro Stations

Author

Listed:
  • Peikun Li

    (School of Highway, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China)

  • Chaoqun Ma

    (School of Highway, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China)

  • Jing Ning

    (School of Highway, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China)

  • Yun Wang

    (School of Highway, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China)

  • Caihua Zhu

    (School of Highway, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China)

Abstract

The improvement of accuracy of short-term passenger flow prediction plays a key role in the efficient and sustainable development of metro operation. The primary objective of this study is to explore the factors that influence prediction accuracy from time granularity and station class. An important aim of the study was also in presenting the proposition of change in a forecasting method. Passenger flow data from 87 Metro stations in Xi’an was collected and analyzed. A framework of short-term passenger flow based on the Empirical Mode Decomposition-Support Vector Regression (EMD-SVR) was proposed to predict passenger flow for different types of stations. Also, the relationship between the generation of passenger flow prediction error and passenger flow data was investigated. First, the metro network was classified into four categories by using eight clustering factors based on the characteristics of inbound passenger flow. Second, Pearson correlation coefficient was utilized to explore the time interval and time granularity for short-term passenger flow prediction. Third, the EMD-SVR was used to predict the passenger flow in the optimal time interval for each station. Results showed that the proposed approach has a significant improvement compared to the traditional passenger flow forecast approach. Lookback Volatility (LVB) was applied to reflect the fluctuation difference of passenger flow data, and the linear fitting of prediction error was conducted. The goodness-of-fit (R 2 ) was found to be 0.768, indicating a good fitting of the data. Furthermore, it revealed that there are obvious differences in the prediction error of the four kinds of stations.

Suggested Citation

  • Peikun Li & Chaoqun Ma & Jing Ning & Yun Wang & Caihua Zhu, 2019. "Analysis of Prediction Accuracy under the Selection of Optimum Time Granularity in Different Metro Stations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-19, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:19:p:5281-:d:270701
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/19/5281/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/19/5281/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Delgado, Felipe & Munoz, Juan Carlos & Giesen, Ricardo, 2012. "How much can holding and/or limiting boarding improve transit performance?," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(9), pages 1202-1217.
    2. Hernández, Daniel & Muñoz, Juan Carlos & Giesen, Ricardo & Delgado, Felipe, 2015. "Analysis of real-time control strategies in a corridor with multiple bus services," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 83-105.
    3. Chen Zhong & Michael Batty & Ed Manley & Jiaqiu Wang & Zijia Wang & Feng Chen & Gerhard Schmitt, 2016. "Variability in Regularity: Mining Temporal Mobility Patterns in London, Singapore and Beijing Using Smart-Card Data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(2), pages 1-17, February.
    4. Lijie Yu & Quan Chen & Kuanmin Chen, 2019. "Deviation of Peak Hours for Urban Rail Transit Stations: A Case Study in Xi’an, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-21, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lu Zeng & Zinuo Li & Jie Yang & Xinyue Xu, 2022. "CEEMDAN-IPSO-LSTM: A Novel Model for Short-Term Passenger Flow Prediction in Urban Rail Transit Systems," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-19, December.
    2. Ting Chen & Jianxiao Ma & Shuang Li & Zhenjun Zhu & Xiucheng Guo, 2023. "Dynamic Evaluation Method for Mutation Degree of Passenger Flow in Urban Rail Transit," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-17, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Shukai & Liu, Ronghui & Yang, Lixing & Gao, Ziyou, 2019. "Robust dynamic bus controls considering delay disturbances and passenger demand uncertainty," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 88-109.
    2. Sánchez-Martínez, G.E. & Koutsopoulos, H.N. & Wilson, N.H.M., 2016. "Real-time holding control for high-frequency transit with dynamics," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 1-19.
    3. Wang, Zhichao & Jiang, Rui & Jiang, Yu & Gao, Ziyou & Liu, Ronghui, 2024. "Modelling bus bunching along a common line corridor considering passenger arrival time and transfer choice under stochastic travel time," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    4. Petit, Antoine & Lei, Chao & Ouyang, Yanfeng, 2019. "Multiline Bus Bunching Control via Vehicle Substitution," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 68-86.
    5. Sirmatel, Isik Ilber & Geroliminis, Nikolas, 2018. "Mixed logical dynamical modeling and hybrid model predictive control of public transport operations," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 325-345.
    6. Gkiotsalitis, K. & Cats, O., 2021. "At-stop control measures in public transport: Literature review and research agenda," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    7. Ying Zhao & Jie Wei & Haijun Li & Yan Huang, 2024. "Predicting Station-Level Peak Hour Ridership of Metro Considering the Peak Deviation Coefficient," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-16, February.
    8. Andres, Matthias & Nair, Rahul, 2017. "A predictive-control framework to address bus bunching," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 123-148.
    9. Bian, Bomin & Zhu, Ning & Meng, Qiang, 2023. "Real-time cruising speed design approach for multiline bus systems," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 1-24.
    10. Wu, Weitiao & Liu, Ronghui & Jin, Wenzhou, 2017. "Modelling bus bunching and holding control with vehicle overtaking and distributed passenger boarding behaviour," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 175-197.
    11. Wu, Weitiao & Liu, Ronghui & Jin, Wenzhou, 2016. "Designing robust schedule coordination scheme for transit networks with safety control margins," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 93(PA), pages 495-519.
    12. Muñoz, Juan Carlos & Batarce, Marco & Hidalgo, Dario, 2014. "Transantiago, five years after its launch," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 184-193.
    13. Qiang, Shengjie & Huang, Qingxia, 2023. "Impacts of bus holding strategies on the performance of mixed traffic system," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 611(C).
    14. Yi Cao & Xue Li, 2022. "Multi-Model Attention Fusion Multilayer Perceptron Prediction Method for Subway OD Passenger Flow under COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-16, November.
    15. N. Oort, 2016. "Incorporating enhanced service reliability of public transport in cost-benefit analyses," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 143-160, March.
    16. Xu, Xin-yue & Liu, Jun & Li, Hai-ying & Jiang, Man, 2016. "Capacity-oriented passenger flow control under uncertain demand: Algorithm development and real-world case study," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 130-148.
    17. Gkiotsalitis, K. & Alesiani, F., 2019. "Robust timetable optimization for bus lines subject to resource and regulatory constraints," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 30-51.
    18. Yu, Chao & Li, Haiying & Xu, Xinyue & Liu, Jun, 2020. "Data-driven approach for solving the route choice problem with traveling backward behavior in congested metro systems," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    19. Mahmood Mahmoodi Nesheli & Avishai (Avi) Ceder & Robin Brissaud, 2017. "Public transport service-quality elements based on real-time operational tactics," Transportation, Springer, vol. 44(5), pages 957-975, September.
    20. Wen, Jian & Nassir, Neema & Zhao, Jinhua, 2019. "Value of demand information in autonomous mobility-on-demand systems," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 346-359.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:19:p:5281-:d:270701. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.