IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i17p4666-d261492.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Study of Environmental Assessment Methods in the Evaluation of Resources and Environmental Carrying Capacity—A Case Study in Xinjiang, China

Author

Listed:
  • Zhiping Zhang

    (State Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Science, Urumqi 830011, China
    University of Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Fuqiang Xia

    (State Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Science, Urumqi 830011, China
    University of Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Degang Yang

    (State Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Science, Urumqi 830011, China
    University of Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Yufang Zhang

    (State Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Science, Urumqi 830011, China
    University of Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Tianyi Cai

    (State Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Science, Urumqi 830011, China
    University of Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Rongwei Wu

    (State Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Science, Urumqi 830011, China
    University of Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100049, China)

Abstract

Scientifically assessing the environmental carrying capacity (ECC) based on an evaluation of environmental quality standards (EQSs) holds great significance for establishing a long-term monitoring and early warning mechanism for resources and environmental carrying capacity (RECC) and for coordinating the sustainable development of ecological environments and regional economies. However, it remains unclear whether the evaluation of EQSs based on the short board effect is suitable for environmental assessments under different natural environments. In this research, Xinjiang is used as a case study. Based on the evaluation of EQSs, the atmospheric environmental carrying capacity (AECC), water environmental carrying capacity (WECC) and comprehensive environmental carrying capacity (CECC) are assessed using the short board effect and the weighted average. Additionally, the suitability of ECC evaluation in RECC evaluation is discussed. The results show the following: (1) In the atmosphere, the overload of inhalable particles (PM 10 ) and fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ) is more serious, while in water, the overload of total nitrogen (TN) is more serious. (2) The percentages of the AECC, WECC and CECC in overloaded counties and cities based on the short board effect are 84%, 45%, and 51%, respectively, while the percentages based on the weighted average are 32%, 6% and 7%, respectively. (3) The extreme effects of a single pollutant can be eliminated by the weighted average, which is more suitable for environmental assessments in Xinjiang. (4) In evaluating RECC monitoring and early warning systems, weighted average evaluation is used to assess the elements, and short board effect evaluation is used in the comprehensive integration to prevent the influence of the amplification of a single index. Thus, the interference of non-key factors in the regional system on the final evaluation results is reduced.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhiping Zhang & Fuqiang Xia & Degang Yang & Yufang Zhang & Tianyi Cai & Rongwei Wu, 2019. "Comparative Study of Environmental Assessment Methods in the Evaluation of Resources and Environmental Carrying Capacity—A Case Study in Xinjiang, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-16, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:17:p:4666-:d:261492
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/17/4666/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/17/4666/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wenyi Wang & Weihua Zeng, 2013. "Optimizing the Regional Industrial Structure Based on the Environmental Carrying Capacity: An Inexact Fuzzy Multi-Objective Programming Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(12), pages 1-25, December.
    2. Xuewei Hou & Dongdong Fei & Hanqing Kang & Yinglong Zhang & Jinhui Gao, 2018. "Seasonal statistical analysis of the impact of meteorological factors on fine particle pollution in China in 2013–2017," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 93(2), pages 677-698, September.
    3. Michelle C. Mack & Edward A. G. Schuur & M. Syndonia Bret-Harte & Gaius R. Shaver & F. Stuart Chapin, 2004. "Ecosystem carbon storage in arctic tundra reduced by long-term nutrient fertilization," Nature, Nature, vol. 431(7007), pages 440-443, September.
    4. Chanhoon Jung & Chanwoo Kim & Solhee Kim & Kyo Suh, 2018. "Analysis of Environmental Carrying Capacity with Emergy Perspective of Jeju Island," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-12, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Guiyou Zhang & Shuai Luo & Zhuowei Jing & Shuo Wei & Youhua Ma, 2020. "Evaluation and Forewarning Management of Regional Resources and Environment Carrying Capacity: A Case Study of Hefei City, Anhui Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-15, February.
    2. Xinhao Min & Yanning Wang & Jun Chen, 2022. "Resource Carrying Capacity Evaluation Based on Fuzzy Evaluation: Validation Using Karst Landscape Region in Southwest China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-19, December.
    3. Shengxin Lan & Xiaona Wang & Meifang Li & Xiaohua Fu & Mei Xu & Jian Zhu & Ping Wang & Yu Mao & Zuoji Dong & Jiahui Li & Lanfang Cao & Zhiming Liu, 2023. "Early Warning Evaluation and Warning Trend Analysis of the Resource and Environment Carrying Capacity in Altay Prefecture, Xinjiang," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-20, June.
    4. Hui Zou & Xiaohua Ma, 2021. "Identifying resource and environmental carrying capacity in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China: the perspectives of spatial differences and sustainable development," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(10), pages 14775-14798, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nicoletta Cannone & M. Guglielmin & P. Convey & M. R. Worland & S. E. Favero Longo, 2016. "Vascular plant changes in extreme environments: effects of multiple drivers," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 134(4), pages 651-665, February.
    2. Mengya Zhang & Shucheng Tan & Jinxuan Zhou & Chao Wang & Feipeng Liu, 2023. "Analyzing Resource and Environment Carrying Capacity of Kunming City Based on Fuzzy Matter–Element Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-20, July.
    3. Felix Bracht & Dennis Verhoeven, 2021. "Air pollution and innovation," CEP Discussion Papers dp1817, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    4. Chanhoon Jung & Chanwoo Kim & Solhee Kim & Kyo Suh, 2018. "Analysis of Environmental Carrying Capacity with Emergy Perspective of Jeju Island," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-12, May.
    5. Sheng Ye & Chao Wei & Zhanqi Wang & Han Wang & Ji Chai, 2021. "Resources and Environment Carrying Capacity, Social Development and Their Decoupling Relationship: A Case Study of Hubei Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-23, November.
    6. van Wijk, M.T., 2007. "Predicting ecosystem functioning from plant traits: Results from a multi-scale ecophysiological modeling approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 203(3), pages 453-463.
    7. Syed Amir Manzoor & Aisha Malik & Muhammad Zubair & Geoffrey Griffiths & Martin Lukac, 2019. "Linking Social Perception and Provision of Ecosystem Services in a Sprawling Urban Landscape: A Case Study of Multan, Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15, January.
    8. Stavros D Veresoglou & Barry Thornton & George Menexes & Andreas P Mamolos & Demetrios S Veresoglou, 2012. "Soil Fertilization Leads to a Decline in Between-Samples Variability of Microbial Community δ13C Profiles in a Grassland Fertilization Experiment," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(9), pages 1-8, September.
    9. Bowen Shen & Shijie Zhang, 2022. "Determinants of Workplace Choice: How Important Is the City’s Ecological Environment in Attracting Jobseekers in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-15, February.
    10. Xinhao Min & Yanning Wang & Jun Chen, 2022. "Resource Carrying Capacity Evaluation Based on Fuzzy Evaluation: Validation Using Karst Landscape Region in Southwest China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-19, December.
    11. Yingxue Rao & Min Zhou & Chunxia Cao & Shukui Tan & Yan Song & Zuo Zhang & Deyi Dai & Guoliang Ou & Lu Zhang & Xin Nie & Aiping Deng & Zhuoma Cairen, 2019. "Exploring the quantitive relationship between economic benefit and environmental constraint using an inexact chance-constrained fuzzy programming based industrial structure optimization model," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 53(4), pages 2199-2220, July.
    12. Jianzhou Wang & Pei Du, 2021. "Quarterly PM2.5 prediction using a novel seasonal grey model and its further application in health effects and economic loss assessment: evidences from Shanghai and Tianjin, China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 107(1), pages 889-909, May.
    13. Neill, Cathy, 2011. "Impacts of crop residue management on soil organic matter stocks: A modelling study," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(15), pages 2751-2760.
    14. Wenqi Wang & Yuhong Sun & Jing Wu, 2018. "Environmental Warning System Based on the DPSIR Model: A Practical and Concise Method for Environmental Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-20, May.
    15. Guiyou Zhang & Shuai Luo & Zhuowei Jing & Shuo Wei & Youhua Ma, 2020. "Evaluation and Forewarning Management of Regional Resources and Environment Carrying Capacity: A Case Study of Hefei City, Anhui Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-15, February.
    16. Małgorzata Świąder & Szymon Szewrański & Jan K. Kazak & Joost Van Hoof & David Lin & Mathis Wackernagel & Armando Alves, 2018. "Application of Ecological Footprint Accounting as a Part of an Integrated Assessment of Environmental Carrying Capacity: A Case Study of the Footprint of Food of a Large City," Resources, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-18, August.
    17. Shiwei Gong & Tao Zhang & Jixun Guo, 2019. "Warming and Nitrogen Addition Change the Soil and Soil Microbial Biomass C:N:P Stoichiometry of a Meadow Steppe," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-14, July.
    18. Nicoletta Cannone & M. Guglielmin & P. Convey & M. Worland & S. Favero Longo, 2016. "Vascular plant changes in extreme environments: effects of multiple drivers," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 134(4), pages 651-665, February.
    19. Chen, Shuaihong & Zhang, Shaowu & Li, Hui & Hu, Tiantian & Sun, Guangzhao & Cui, Xiaolu & Liu, Jie, 2024. "Optimizing irrigation and nitrogen management improves soil soluble nitrogen pools and reduces nitrate residues in a drip-fertigated apple orchard on the Loess Plateau," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 295(C).
    20. Jens Strauss & Christina Biasi & Tina Sanders & Benjamin W. Abbott & Thomas Schneider Deimling & Carolina Voigt & Matthias Winkel & Maija E. Marushchak & Dan Kou & Matthias Fuchs & Marcus A. Horn & Lo, 2022. "A globally relevant stock of soil nitrogen in the Yedoma permafrost domain," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-9, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:17:p:4666-:d:261492. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.