IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i13p3502-d243075.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Study on Consumers’ Preferences for the Palace Museum’s Cultural and Creative Products from the Perspective of Cultural Sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • Jui-Che Tu

    (Graduate School of Design, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, Yunlin 64002, Taiwan)

  • Li-Xia Liu

    (Graduate School of Design, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, Yunlin 64002, Taiwan
    College of Arts, Beijing Union University, Beijing 100101, China)

  • Yang Cui

    (School of Art and Communication, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China)

Abstract

In recent years, the development and design of the cultural and creative products of the Palace Museum in Beijing have become a hot topic in the product design field. Many critics have pointed out that cultural and creative products have failed to faithfully convey the implied meanings of the cultural stories of the Palace Museum. To effectively narrow the cognitive gap between designers and consumers, designers must urgently clarify the relationship between different design attributes and consumer preferences. The questionnaires were used to obtain data from 297 subjects. Through SPSS statistical software, the results were analyzed by descriptive statistics, explore factor analysis (EFA), independent sample t -test, and ANOVA to explore consumers’ attitudes and preferences on the Palace Museum’s cultural and creative products. The results showed that consumers attach great importance to factors such as “cultural connotation” and “unique creativity” when choosing the Palace Museum’s cultural and creative products. The consumer in different genders had significant differences in the design factors of the Palace Museum’s cultural and creative products. There were significant differences in the factors of “Forbidden City culture”, “cultural sustainability” and “traditional culture” to different educational backgrounds. There were significant differences in the factor of “Forbidden City culture” to different ages. There were significant differences in the factors of “cultural traits” and “cultural identity” between the with and without a design background groups. The results of this study will identify the key factors for the design of the Palace’s Museum cultural and creative products and provide references for designers.

Suggested Citation

  • Jui-Che Tu & Li-Xia Liu & Yang Cui, 2019. "A Study on Consumers’ Preferences for the Palace Museum’s Cultural and Creative Products from the Perspective of Cultural Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-23, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:13:p:3502-:d:243075
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/13/3502/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/13/3502/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jui-Che Tu & Yang Cui & Li-Xia Liu & Meng-Hui Lin, 2019. "A Study on the Preference of Healing Products for Single Office Workers of Various Lifestyles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-23, April.
    2. Jing Lin & Jianming Cai & Yan Han & He Zhu & Zhe Cheng, 2016. "Culture Sustainability: Culture Quotient (CQ) and Its Quantitative Empirical Application to Chinese Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-12, November.
    3. Chaney, Damien & Pulh, Mathilde & Mencarelli, Rémi, 2018. "When the arts inspire businesses: Museums as a heritage redefinition tool of brands," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 452-458.
    4. Damien Chaney & Mathilde Pulh & Rémi Mencarelli, 2018. "When the arts inspire businesses: Museums as a heritage redefinition tool of brands," Post-Print hal-02047968, HAL.
    5. Katriina Soini & Joost Dessein, 2016. "Culture-Sustainability Relation: Towards a Conceptual Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-12, February.
    6. Damien Chaney & Mathilde Pulh & Rémi Mencarelli, 2018. "When the arts inspire businesses: Museums as a heritage redefinition tool of brands," Post-Print hal-01698405, HAL.
    7. Sagoff, Mark, 2003. "On the relation between preference and choice," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 587-598.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hui Cheng & Xu Sun & Jing Xie & Bing-Jian Liu & Liang Xia & Shi-Jian Luo & Xin Tian & Xiao Qiu & Wei Li & Yang Li, 2024. "Constructing and validating the museum product creativity measurement (MPCM): dimensions for creativity assessment of souvenir products in Chinese urban historical museums," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, December.
    2. Danni Shen & Herui Guo & Linghui Yu & Jie Ying & Jie Shen & Shuchen Ying & Defu Bao & Ying Wang, 2022. "Sound Design of Guqin Culture: Interactive Art Promotes the Sustainable Development of Traditional Culture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-16, February.
    3. Zhao Li & Shujin Shu & Jun Shao & Elizabeth Booth & Alastair M. Morrison, 2021. "Innovative or Not? The Effects of Consumer Perceived Value on Purchase Intentions for the Palace Museum’s Cultural and Creative Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.
    4. Manuel J. Carretero-Ayuso & Carlos E. Rodríguez-Jiménez, 2019. "Calculation of the Risk of Lawsuits over Construction Flaws in Flat Roofs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-18, September.
    5. Jun Wu & Wenzhe Luo & Jiaru Chen & Rungtai Lin & Yanru Lyu, 2023. "Design Ritual into Modern Product: A Case Study of Chinese Bronze Ware," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-18, August.
    6. Kuo-Kuang Fan & Ying Zhou, 2020. "The Influence of Traditional Cultural Resources (TCRs) on the Communication of Clothing Brands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-19, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mathilde Pulh & Rémi Mencarelli & Damien Chaney, 2019. "The consequences of the heritage experience in brand museums on the consumer–brand relationship," Post-Print halshs-02142424, HAL.
    2. repec:fan:istois:v:html10.3280/isto2023-047002 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Chiara Dalle Nogare & Monika Murzyn-Kupisz, 2024. "Core functions, visitor friendliness and digitalisation: a comparative analysis of corporate museums’ performance," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 48(3), pages 405-437, September.
    4. Siyi Wang & Liying Yu & Yuan Rong, 2024. "Measuring museum sustainability in China: a DSR model-driven approach to empower sustainable development goals (SDGs)," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, December.
    5. repec:fan:istois:v:html10.3280/isto2023-047003 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Danni Shen & Herui Guo & Linghui Yu & Jie Ying & Jie Shen & Shuchen Ying & Defu Bao & Ying Wang, 2022. "Sound Design of Guqin Culture: Interactive Art Promotes the Sustainable Development of Traditional Culture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-16, February.
    7. Ernestyna Szpakowska-Loranc, 2021. "Multi-Attribute Analysis of Contemporary Cultural Buildings in the Historic Urban Fabric as Sustainable Spaces—Krakow Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-25, May.
    8. Wende Wang & Mozhuang Fu & Qingwu Hu, 2020. "The Behavioral Pattern of Chinese Public Cultural Participation in Museums," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-22, April.
    9. Çağla Beyaz & Çilen Erçin, 2023. "Evaluation of Modern Architecture Criteria in the Context of Sustainability and Architectural Approach; Modern Period in North Nicosia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-48, June.
    10. Robert J. DiNapoli & Carl P. Lipo & Terry L. Hunt, 2021. "Triumph of the Commons: Sustainable Community Practices on Rapa Nui (Easter Island)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-23, November.
    11. Valentina Montalto & Pier Luigi Sacco & Michaela Saisana, 2022. "Cultural, Creative, and Sustainable Cities: Assessing Progress and Measurement Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-7, April.
    12. Theresa Enright, 2023. "Art in transit: Mobility, aesthetics and urban development," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(1), pages 67-84, January.
    13. Mara Cerquetti & Domenico Sardanelli & Concetta Ferrara, 2024. "Measuring museum sustainability within the framework of institutional theory: A dictionary‐based content analysis of French and British National Museums' annual reports," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(3), pages 2260-2276, May.
    14. Carmen Isensee & Frank Teuteberg & Kai Michael Griese, 2022. "Exploring the Use of Mobile Apps for Fostering Sustainability-Oriented Corporate Culture: A Qualitative Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-25, June.
    15. Chi-Hua Wu & Yu-Lin Chao & Jia-Ting Xiong & Ding-Bang Luh, 2022. "Gamification of Culture: A Strategy for Cultural Preservation and Local Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, December.
    16. Ezwani Azmi & Rosniza Aznie Che Rose & Azahan Awang, 2024. "A Conceptual Research of Satellite Tourism Destinations (SToD)," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(9), pages 1618-1628, September.
    17. Maria de Fátima Barbosa Góes & José Célio Silveira Andrade & Charbel Jose Chiappetta Jabbour & Marcelo Santana Silva, 2021. "Wind power projects in Brazil: challenges and opportunities increasing co-benefits and implications for climate and energy policies," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(10), pages 15341-15367, October.
    18. Małgorzata Ćwikła & Anna Góral & Ewa Bogacz-Wojtanowska & Magdalena Dudkiewicz, 2020. "Project-Based Work and Sustainable Development—A Comparative Case Study of Cultural Animation Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-24, August.
    19. Dalia Streimikiene & Asta Mikalauskiene & Ilona Kiausiene, 2019. "The Impact of Value Created by Culture on Approaching the Sustainable Development Goals: Case of the Baltic States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-25, November.
    20. Jing Lin & Jianming Cai & Yan Han & Jiansheng Liu, 2017. "Identifying the Conditions for Rural Sustainability through Place-Based Culture: Applying the CIPM and CDPM Models into Meibei Ancient Village," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-15, July.
    21. Kong, Hyun Min & Witmaier, Alexander & Ko, Eunju, 2021. "Sustainability and social media communication: How consumers respond to marketing efforts of luxury and non-luxury fashion brands," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 640-651.
    22. Lívia Garcez de Oliveira Padilha & Lenka Malek & Wendy J. Umberger, 2021. "Sustainable Meat: Looking through the Eyes of Australian Consumers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-24, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:13:p:3502-:d:243075. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.