IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v9y2017i8p1334-d106356.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identifying the Conditions for Rural Sustainability through Place-Based Culture: Applying the CIPM and CDPM Models into Meibei Ancient Village

Author

Listed:
  • Jing Lin

    (Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
    Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
    School of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Jianming Cai

    (Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
    Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
    School of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Yan Han

    (Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
    Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
    School of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Jiansheng Liu

    (College of Public Administration, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, China
    Institute of Jiangxi Poverty Alleviation and Development Studies, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, China)

Abstract

Transitional rural China faces more serious challenges in its sustainable development. How to regain the vital momentum of those historically and culturally preeminent villages, among over 680,000 administrative villages in total, has become the pressing agenda for all the stakeholders, due to the fact that these villages have huge potential to be the leverage for successful rural transition and new urbanization in China. This paper therefore tries to diagnose and identify the current situation of those villages from a cultural perspective by taking the Meibei ancient village as the case. By applying the proposed Cultural Inverted Pyramid Model (CIPM) and Cultural Dual Pyramid Model (CDPM) with seven layers, i.e., root/vision, value, symbol, hero, ritual, lifestyle, and governance & management, Meibei’s development mechanism has been systematically explored from a cultural perspective through the comparison between its past prosperity and present challenges. It is found that the great merit of Meibei’s past prosperity lied in the organic integration of cultural elements in all the layers through the five development dimensions, i.e., economic, social, institutional, environmental and cultural dimensions. The empirical study proves that CIPM is a useful tool for diagnosing and identifying the current situation of the village, while CDPM is an effective instrument for planning and designing a culture-embedded and improved place for the future. Unless Meibei can recreate a new cultural ecosystem with resilience fitting to its existed heritage with cultural excellence and tourism promotion, the village cannot catch up with its past prosperity. Finally, this paper calls for more in-depth culture-oriented research to improve the CIPM and CDPM paradigm to allow for the realization of rural sustainability, particularly from the perspectives of policy options and academic concerns.

Suggested Citation

  • Jing Lin & Jianming Cai & Yan Han & Jiansheng Liu, 2017. "Identifying the Conditions for Rural Sustainability through Place-Based Culture: Applying the CIPM and CDPM Models into Meibei Ancient Village," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-15, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:8:p:1334-:d:106356
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/8/1334/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/8/1334/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jing Lin & Jianming Cai & Yan Han & He Zhu & Zhe Cheng, 2016. "Culture Sustainability: Culture Quotient (CQ) and Its Quantitative Empirical Application to Chinese Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-12, November.
    2. Kees Krul & Peter Ho, 2017. "Alternative Approaches to Food: Community Supported Agriculture in Urban China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-16, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jizhe Zhou & Quanhua Hou & Wentao Dong, 2019. "Spatial Characteristics of Population Activities in Suburban Villages Based on Cellphone Signaling Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-19, April.
    2. Naji Akbar & Ismaila Rimi Abubakar & Adel Saleh Bouregh, 2020. "Fostering Urban Sustainability through the Ecological Wisdom of Traditional Settlements," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-19, December.
    3. Rudolf Kampf & Silvia Lorincová & Miloš Hitka & Ondrej Stopka, 2017. "Generational Differences in the Perception of Corporate Culture in European Transport Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-14, September.
    4. Hua Zhao & Zongsheng Huang & Caijie Deng & Yuxin Ren, 2023. "The Decorative Auspicious Elements of Traditional Bai Architecture in Shaxi Ancient Town, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-17, January.
    5. Keshuai Xu & Jin Zhang & Fengjun Tian, 2017. "Community Leadership in Rural Tourism Development: A Tale of Two Ancient Chinese Villages," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-22, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Leigh Martindale, 2021. "‘I will know it when I taste it’: trust, food materialities and social media in Chinese alternative food networks," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 38(2), pages 365-380, June.
    2. David Meek, 2022. "From marginalized to miracle: critical bioregionalism, jungle farming and the move to millets in Karnataka, India," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(3), pages 871-883, September.
    3. Karlis Rokpelnis & Peter Ho & Gong Cheng & Heng Zhao, 2018. "Consumer Perceptions of the Commodification and Related Conservation of Traditional Indigenous Naxi Forest Products as Credence Goods (China)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-18, October.
    4. Rokpelnis, Karlis & Ho, Peter & Cheng, Gong & Zhao, Heng, 2018. "Consumer perceptions of the commodification and related conservation of traditional indigenous Naxi forest products as credence goods (China)," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 91498, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Junhong Chen & Zhifeng Gao & Xuqi Chen & Lisha Zhang, 2019. "Factors Affecting the Dynamics of Community Supported Agriculture (CSA) Membership," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-13, August.
    6. Jui-Che Tu & Li-Xia Liu & Yang Cui, 2019. "A Study on Consumers’ Preferences for the Palace Museum’s Cultural and Creative Products from the Perspective of Cultural Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-23, June.
    7. Danni Shen & Herui Guo & Linghui Yu & Jie Ying & Jie Shen & Shuchen Ying & Defu Bao & Ying Wang, 2022. "Sound Design of Guqin Culture: Interactive Art Promotes the Sustainable Development of Traditional Culture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-16, February.
    8. Mirka Erler & Christoph Dittrich, 2020. "Middle Class, Tradition and the Desi-Realm—Discourses of Alternative Food Networks in Bengaluru, India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-15, March.
    9. Yahya Dabaghi & Shahla Choobchian & Hassan Sadighi & Hossein Azadi, 2022. "Consumers’ attitude toward participation in community-supported aquaculture: a case of Kurdistan province in the west of Iran," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 12(4), pages 870-889, December.
    10. Si Tan & Weiping Chen, 2019. "Can members’ WeChat engagement affect relational outcomes in community‐supported agriculture? Empirical evidence from China," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(1), pages 36-52, January.
    11. Zhen, Huayang & Gao, Wenzeng & Yuan, Kai & Ju, Xuehai & Qiao, Yuhui, 2021. "Internalizing externalities through net ecosystem service analysis–A case study of greenhouse vegetable farms in Beijing," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    12. Xueling Sheng & Yucheng Zhou & Yaofei Liu, 2024. "Can the National Public Cultural Service System Demonstration Zone Promote the Sustainable Development of Urban Culture?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-21, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:8:p:1334-:d:106356. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.