IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i7p2333-d156425.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Vulnerability Assessment for Cascading Failure in the Highway Traffic System

Author

Listed:
  • Han Liu

    (School of Transportation Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, No. 73, Huanghe River Road, Nangang District, Harbin 150090, Heilongjiang, China)

  • Jian Wang

    (School of Management, Harbin Institute of Technology, No. 73, Huanghe River Road, Nangang District, Harbin 150090, Heilongjiang, China)

Abstract

Vulnerability assessment is of great significance to highway traffic system. As the widespread cascading failure may cause serious damage, factor identification is necessary to improve the security level of highway system. In this paper, the Dematel method is applied to identify the vulnerability priorities of important factors, and a new assessment method for highway system vulnerability is presented by considering system cascading failure. The traffic allocation and reallocation are then optimized under user equilibrium assignment model in different scenarios. Finally, the methodology is applied to the Heilongjiang highway network and the results shows that vulnerable sections in highway networks can be determined efficiently in our proposed process.

Suggested Citation

  • Han Liu & Jian Wang, 2018. "Vulnerability Assessment for Cascading Failure in the Highway Traffic System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-12, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:7:p:2333-:d:156425
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/7/2333/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/7/2333/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Katja Berdica & Lars-Göran Mattsson, 2007. "Vulnerability: A Model-Based Case Study of the Road Network in Stockholm," Advances in Spatial Science, in: Alan T. Murray & Tony H. Grubesic (ed.), Critical Infrastructure, chapter 5, pages 81-106, Springer.
    2. Asadabadi, Ali & Miller-Hooks, Elise, 2017. "Assessing strategies for protecting transportation infrastructure from an uncertain climate future," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 27-41.
    3. Jenelius, Erik & Petersen, Tom & Mattsson, Lars-Göran, 2006. "Importance and exposure in road network vulnerability analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 40(7), pages 537-560, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rahimi-Golkhandan, Armin & Aslani, Babak & Mohebbi, Shima, 2022. "Predictive resilience of interdependent water and transportation infrastructures: A sociotechnical approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    2. Zhanzhong Wang & Ruijuan Chu & Minghang Zhang & Xiaochao Wang & Siliang Luan, 2020. "An Improved Hybrid Highway Traffic Flow Prediction Model Based on Machine Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-22, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jenelius, Erik, 2010. "User inequity implications of road network vulnerability," The Journal of Transport and Land Use, Center for Transportation Studies, University of Minnesota, vol. 2(3), pages 57-73.
    2. Jenelius, Erik & Mattsson, Lars-Göran, 2012. "Road network vulnerability analysis of area-covering disruptions: A grid-based approach with case study," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(5), pages 746-760.
    3. Rodríguez-Núñez, Eduardo & García-Palomares, Juan Carlos, 2014. "Measuring the vulnerability of public transport networks," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 50-63.
    4. Nima Haghighi & S. Kiavash Fayyaz & Xiaoyue Cathy Liu & Tony H. Grubesic & Ran Wei, 2018. "A Multi-Scenario Probabilistic Simulation Approach for Critical Transportation Network Risk Assessment," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 181-203, March.
    5. Taylor, Michael A.P. & Susilawati,, 2012. "Remoteness and accessibility in the vulnerability analysis of regional road networks," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(5), pages 761-771.
    6. Ghavami, Seyed Morsal, 2019. "Multi-criteria spatial decision support system for identifying strategic roads in disaster situations," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 23-36.
    7. Pan, Shouzheng & Yan, Hai & He, Jia & He, Zhengbing, 2021. "Vulnerability and resilience of transportation systems: A recent literature review," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 581(C).
    8. Juan Carlos García-Palomares & Javier Gutiérrez & Juan Carlos Martín & Borja Moya-Gómez, 2018. "An analysis of the Spanish high capacity road network criticality," Transportation, Springer, vol. 45(4), pages 1139-1159, July.
    9. Martinez-Pastor, Beatriz & Nogal, Maria & O’Connor, Alan & Teixeira, Rui, 2022. "Identifying critical and vulnerable links: A new approach using the Fisher information matrix," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    10. Chen, Bi Yu & Lam, William H.K. & Sumalee, Agachai & Li, Qingquan & Li, Zhi-Chun, 2012. "Vulnerability analysis for large-scale and congested road networks with demand uncertainty," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 501-516.
    11. Federico Rupi & Silvia Bernardi & Guido Rossi & Antonio Danesi, 2015. "The Evaluation of Road Network Vulnerability in Mountainous Areas: A Case Study," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 397-411, June.
    12. Agostino Torti & Marika Arena & Giovanni Azzone & Piercesare Secchi & Simone Vantini, 2022. "Bridge closure in the road network of Lombardy: a spatio-temporal analysis of the socio-economic impacts," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 31(4), pages 901-923, October.
    13. Sullivan, J.L. & Novak, D.C. & Aultman-Hall, L. & Scott, D.M., 2010. "Identifying critical road segments and measuring system-wide robustness in transportation networks with isolating links: A link-based capacity-reduction approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 44(5), pages 323-336, June.
    14. Zhang, Nan & Huang, Hong & Su, Boni & Zhao, Jinlong, 2015. "Analysis of dynamic road risk for pedestrian evacuation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 430(C), pages 171-183.
    15. Richard Connors & David Watling, 2015. "Assessing the Demand Vulnerability of Equilibrium Traffic Networks via Network Aggregation," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 367-395, June.
    16. Cats, Oded & Jenelius, Erik, 2015. "Planning for the unexpected: The value of reserve capacity for public transport network robustness," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 47-61.
    17. Mengying Cui & David Levinson, 2018. "Accessibility analysis of risk severity," Transportation, Springer, vol. 45(4), pages 1029-1050, July.
    18. Dowds, Jonathan & Aultman-Hall, Lisa, 2015. "Challenges and Opportunities for Integrating Climate Adaptation Efforts across State, Regional and Local Transportation Agencies," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt5t88h66m, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    19. Bucar, Raif C.B. & Hayeri, Yeganeh M., 2020. "Quantitative assessment of the impacts of disruptive precipitation on surface transportation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    20. Kurmankhojayev, Daniyar & Li, Guoyuan & Chen, Anthony, 2024. "Link criticality index: Refinement, framework extension, and a case study," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:7:p:2333-:d:156425. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.