IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i5p1583-d146534.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Selection of the Most Suitable Alternative Fuel Depending on the Fuel Characteristics and Price by the Hybrid MCDM Method

Author

Listed:
  • Sinan Erdogan

    (Institute of Pure and Applied Sciences, Marmara University, Istanbul 34722, Turkey)

  • Cenk Sayin

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Technology Faculty, Marmara University, Istanbul 34722, Turkey)

Abstract

In recent years, in order to increase the quality of life of people, energy usage has become very important. Researchers are constantly searching for new sources of energy due to increased energy demand. Engine tests are being conducted to investigate the feasibility of the new sources of energy such as alternative fuels. In the engine tests, engine performance, combustion characteristics and exhaust emissions are evaluated by obtaining the results. The effect of newly developed fuels on engine lifetime, safe transport and storage are also examined for fuel availability. In addition, the potential and the price of fuels are important in terms of sustainability. In these studies, laboratory environments are needed for experimental setups. It is difficult to determine the availability of the most suitable alternative fuel since numerous results are obtained in the engine tests and studies. This integrated model provides a great advantage in terms of time and cost. The physical and chemical properties of the fuel affect experimental results such as engine performance, combustion, and exhaust emission. The suggested model can be making the most efficient and eco-friendly fuel choice without the need for experimental studies by using physical and chemical properties of the fuel. It also can offer the best fuel for cost, safety and maintenance processes. In this study, animal fat biodiesel derived from waste animal fats and vegetable oil biodiesel produced from aspir-canola oils were investigated. Biodiesel fuels are mixed with diesel at 5%, 20%, and 50%, and nine different fuels prepared with three pure fuels, and six different fuel blends are compared. Before using these fuels in an experimental study, estimates are made about which fuels may be more advantageous in terms of many criteria. In the process, nine varied fuel specifications are taken as references such as calorific value, cetane number, oxygen content rate, fuel price, flash point, viscosity, lubricity, iodine number and water content. The criteria weights are determined with SWARA ( Step-Wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis) from multi-criteria decision-making models, and MULTIMOORA (Multi-Objective Optimization on the basis of Ratio Analysis) is ranked according to fuels’ characteristics from the best to the worst. While theoretically, the best fuel is ultimately VOB20, VOB50 and AFB20 were selected as the second fuel and the third fuel.

Suggested Citation

  • Sinan Erdogan & Cenk Sayin, 2018. "Selection of the Most Suitable Alternative Fuel Depending on the Fuel Characteristics and Price by the Hybrid MCDM Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-15, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:5:p:1583-:d:146534
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/5/1583/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/5/1583/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Banković-Ilić, Ivana B. & Stojković, Ivan J. & Stamenković, Olivera S. & Veljkovic, Vlada B. & Hung, Yung-Tse, 2014. "Waste animal fats as feedstocks for biodiesel production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 238-254.
    2. Behçet, Rasim & Oktay, Hasan & Çakmak, Abdulvahap & Aydin, Hüseyin, 2015. "Comparison of exhaust emissions of biodiesel–diesel fuel blends produced from animal fats," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 157-165.
    3. Wan Ghazali, Wan Nor Maawa & Mamat, Rizalman & Masjuki, H.H. & Najafi, Gholamhassan, 2015. "Effects of biodiesel from different feedstocks on engine performance and emissions: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 585-602.
    4. Mohammed I. Jahirul & Richard J. Brown & Wijitha Senadeera & Ian M. O'Hara & Zoran D. Ristovski, 2013. "The Use of Artificial Neural Networks for Identifying Sustainable Biodiesel Feedstocks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(8), pages 1-43, July.
    5. Abedin, M.J. & Kalam, M.A. & Masjuki, H.H. & Sabri, M.F.M. & Rahman, S.M. Ashrafur & Sanjid, A. & Fattah, I.M. Rizwanul, 2016. "Production of biodiesel from a non-edible source and study of its combustion, and emission characteristics: A comparative study with B5," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 20-29.
    6. Arjun B. Chhetri & K. Chris Watts & M. Rafiqul Islam, 2008. "Waste Cooking Oil as an Alternate Feedstock for Biodiesel Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 1(1), pages 1-16, April.
    7. Godiganur, Sharanappa & Suryanarayana Murthy, Ch. & Reddy, Rana Prathap, 2010. "Performance and emission characteristics of a Kirloskar HA394 diesel engine operated on fish oil methyl esters," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 355-359.
    8. Wang, Jiang-Jiang & Jing, You-Yin & Zhang, Chun-Fa & Shi, Guo-Hua & Zhang, Xu-Tao, 2008. "A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model for trigeneration system," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(10), pages 3823-3832, October.
    9. Isidro Ovando-Medina & Francisco Espinosa-García & Juan Núñez-Farfán & Miguel Salvador-Figueroa, 2009. "Does Biodiesel from Jatropha Curcas Represent a Sustainable Alternative Energy Source?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 1(4), pages 1-7, November.
    10. Oseweuba Valentine Okoro & Zhifa Sun & John Birch, 2018. "Catalyst-Free Biodiesel Production Methods: A Comparative Technical and Environmental Evaluation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-22, January.
    11. Kumar, Niraj & Varun, & Chauhan, Sant Ram, 2013. "Performance and emission characteristics of biodiesel from different origins: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 633-658.
    12. Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung & Lin, Cheng-Wei & Opricovic, Serafim, 2005. "Multi-criteria analysis of alternative-fuel buses for public transportation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(11), pages 1373-1383, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mateusz Piwowarski & Danuta Miłaszewicz & Małgorzata Łatuszyńska & Mariusz Borawski & Kesra Nermend, 2018. "Application of the Vector Measure Construction Method and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity Ideal Solution for the Analysis of the Dynamics of Changes in the Poverty Levels in the European ," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-24, August.
    2. Teodora M. Șoimoșan & Ligia M. Moga & Livia Anastasiu & Daniela L. Manea & Aurica Căzilă & Čedomir Zeljković, 2021. "Overall Efficiency of On-Site Production and Storage of Solar Thermal Energy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-19, January.
    3. Siksnelyte, Indre & Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras & Bausys, Romualdas & Streimikiene, Dalia, 2019. "Implementation of EU energy policy priorities in the Baltic Sea Region countries: Sustainability assessment based on neutrosophic MULTIMOORA method," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 90-102.
    4. Narayanamoorthy, Samayan & Ramya, L. & Kalaiselvan, Samayan & Kureethara, Joseph Varghese & Kang, Daekook, 2021. "Use of DEMATEL and COPRAS method to select best alternative fuel for control of impact of greenhouse gas emissions," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    5. Ziyuan Tang & Hasan Dinçer, 2019. "Selecting the House-of-Quality-Based Energy Investment Policies for the Sustainable Emerging Economies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-22, June.
    6. Andrej David & Peter Mako & Jan Lizbetin & Patrik Bohm, 2021. "The Impact of an Environmental Way of Customer’s Thinking on a Range of Choice from Transport Routes in Maritime Transport," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-23, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sakthivel, R. & Ramesh, K. & Purnachandran, R. & Mohamed Shameer, P., 2018. "A review on the properties, performance and emission aspects of the third generation biodiesels," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 2970-2992.
    2. Tamilselvan, P. & Nallusamy, N. & Rajkumar, S., 2017. "A comprehensive review on performance, combustion and emission characteristics of biodiesel fuelled diesel engines," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 1134-1159.
    3. Obed M. Ali & Rizalman Mamat & Gholamhassan Najafi & Talal Yusaf & Seyed Mohammad Safieddin Ardebili, 2015. "Optimization of Biodiesel-Diesel Blended Fuel Properties and Engine Performance with Ether Additive Using Statistical Analysis and Response Surface Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-15, December.
    4. El-Shafay, A.S. & Ağbulut, Ümit & Attia, El-Awady & Touileb, Kamel Lounes & Gad, M.S., 2023. "Waste to energy: Production of poultry-based fat biodiesel and experimental assessment of its usability on engine behaviors," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PB).
    5. Masera, Kemal & Hossain, Abul Kalam, 2023. "Advancement of biodiesel fuel quality and NOx emission control techniques," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    6. Gnanasekaran, Sakthivel & Saravanan, N. & Ilangkumaran, M., 2016. "Influence of injection timing on performance, emission and combustion characteristics of a DI diesel engine running on fish oil biodiesel," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(P1), pages 1218-1229.
    7. Tayari, Sara & Abedi, Reza & Rahi, Abbas, 2020. "Comparative assessment of engine performance and emissions fueled with three different biodiesel generations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P1), pages 1058-1069.
    8. Erdoğan, Sinan & Balki, Mustafa Kemal & Aydın, Selman & Sayin, Cenk, 2019. "The best fuel selection with hybrid multiple-criteria decision making approaches in a CI engine fueled with their blends and pure biodiesels produced from different sources," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 653-668.
    9. El-Shafay, A.S. & Gad, M.S. & Ağbulut, Ümit & Attia, El-Awady, 2023. "Optimization of performance and emission outputs of a CI engine powered with waste fat biodiesel: A detailed RSM, fuzzy multi-objective and MCDM application," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    10. Zaharin, M.S.M. & Abdullah, N.R. & Najafi, G. & Sharudin, H. & Yusaf, T., 2017. "Effects of physicochemical properties of biodiesel fuel blends with alcohol on diesel engine performance and exhaust emissions: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 475-493.
    11. Erdoğan, Sinan & Balki, Mustafa Kemal & Aydın, Selman & Sayın, Cenk, 2020. "Performance, emission and combustion characteristic assessment of biodiesels derived from beef bone marrow in a diesel generator," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    12. Bhuiya, M.M.K. & Rasul, M.G. & Khan, M.M.K. & Ashwath, N. & Azad, A.K., 2016. "Prospects of 2nd generation biodiesel as a sustainable fuel—Part: 1 selection of feedstocks, oil extraction techniques and conversion technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 1109-1128.
    13. E, Jiaqiang & Pham, Minhhieu & Zhao, D. & Deng, Yuanwang & Le, DucHieu & Zuo, Wei & Zhu, Hao & Liu, Teng & Peng, Qingguo & Zhang, Zhiqing, 2017. "Effect of different technologies on combustion and emissions of the diesel engine fueled with biodiesel: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 620-647.
    14. Singh, Paramvir & Varun, & Chauhan, S.R. & Kumar, Niraj, 2016. "A review on methodology for complete elimination of diesel from CI engines using mixed feedstock," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 1110-1125.
    15. Hoseini, S.S. & Najafi, G. & Ghobadian, B. & Mamat, R. & Ebadi, M.T. & Yusaf, Talal, 2018. "Novel environmentally friendly fuel: The effects of nanographene oxide additives on the performance and emission characteristics of diesel engines fuelled with Ailanthus altissima biodiesel," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 283-294.
    16. Mat Yasin, Mohd Hafizil & Mamat, Rizalman & Najafi, G. & Ali, Obed Majeed & Yusop, Ahmad Fitri & Ali, Mohd Hafiz, 2017. "Potentials of palm oil as new feedstock oil for a global alternative fuel: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 1034-1049.
    17. Behçet, Rasim & Oktay, Hasan & Çakmak, Abdulvahap & Aydin, Hüseyin, 2015. "Comparison of exhaust emissions of biodiesel–diesel fuel blends produced from animal fats," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 157-165.
    18. Jahirul, M.I. & Rasul, M.G. & Brown, R.J. & Senadeera, W. & Hosen, M.A. & Haque, R. & Saha, S.C. & Mahlia, T.M.I., 2021. "Investigation of correlation between chemical composition and properties of biodiesel using principal component analysis (PCA) and artificial neural network (ANN)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 632-646.
    19. Varun, & Singh, Paramvir & Tiwari, Samaresh Kumar & Singh, Rituparn & Kumar, Naresh, 2017. "Modification in combustion chamber geometry of CI engines for suitability of biodiesel: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 1016-1033.
    20. Yaakob, Zahira & Narayanan, Binitha N. & Padikkaparambil, Silija & Unni K., Surya & Akbar P., Mohammed, 2014. "A review on the oxidation stability of biodiesel," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 136-153.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:5:p:1583-:d:146534. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.