IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v14y2024i11p221-d1507579.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Building Bridges in Diverse Societies: A Meta-Analysis of Field Experimental Cooperative Learning Studies on Intergroup Relations in Educational Settings

Author

Listed:
  • Marselius Sampe Tondok

    (Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya 60115, Indonesia
    Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Surabaya, Surabaya 60293, Indonesia)

  • Suryanto Suryanto

    (Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya 60115, Indonesia)

  • Rahkman Ardi

    (Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya 60115, Indonesia)

Abstract

Cooperative learning has been widely utilized as an intervention to enhance intergroup relations in diverse societies, drawing on intergroup contact theory. Despite numerous field experiments testing its effectiveness in educational contexts, a comprehensive meta-analyses evaluating its overall efficacy has yet to be conducted. This meta-analysis aims to assess the magnitude of the effect of cooperative learning on promoting intergroup relations within experimental field studies conducted in educational settings. The article search was performed according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria across ERIC, ScienceDirect, Scopus, and SpringerLink. Data analysis involved generating forest plots, conducting heterogeneity tests, calculating summary effects using a random effects model, and identifying publication bias. The meta-analysis of 18 field experimental intervention studies, involving 5265 participants, revealed that cooperative learning intervention programs positively impact intergroup relations, with a moderate effect size (ES = 0.33; 95% CI [0.25, 0.40]). Consequently, cooperative learning can be employed as an alternative strategy to bridge gaps, reduce prejudice, and improve relations among groups with diverse social identities in educational settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Marselius Sampe Tondok & Suryanto Suryanto & Rahkman Ardi, 2024. "Building Bridges in Diverse Societies: A Meta-Analysis of Field Experimental Cooperative Learning Studies on Intergroup Relations in Educational Settings," Societies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-12, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:14:y:2024:i:11:p:221-:d:1507579
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/14/11/221/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/14/11/221/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Steven D. Levitt & John A. List, 2007. "Viewpoint: On the generalizability of lab behaviour to the field," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(2), pages 347-370, May.
    2. António Fragoso & Josélia Fonseca, 2022. "Combating Ageism through Adult Education and Learning," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-12, March.
    3. Flavia Albarello & Silvia Moscatelli & Michela Menegatti & Fabio Lucidi & Elisa Cavicchiolo & Sara Manganelli & Pierluigi Diotaiuti & Andrea Chirico & Fabio Alivernini, 2023. "Prejudice towards Immigrants: A Conceptual and Theoretical Overview on Its Social Psychological Determinants," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, December.
    4. Carlos Fernández-Espínola & Manuel Tomás Abad Robles & Daniel Collado-Mateo & Bartolomé J. Almagro & Estefanía Castillo Viera & Francisco Javier Giménez Fuentes-Guerra, 2020. "Effects of Cooperative-Learning Interventions on Physical Education Students’ Intrinsic Motivation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-10, June.
    5. Chiara Imperato & Brian T. Keum & Tiziana Mancini, 2021. "Does Intercultural Contact Increase Anti-Racist Behavior on Social Network Sites?," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-14, June.
    6. Taofeng Liu & Mariusz Lipowski, 2021. "Influence of Cooperative Learning Intervention on the Intrinsic Motivation of Physical Education Students—A Meta-Analysis within a Limited Range," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-11, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael L. Anderson & Fangwen Lu, 2017. "Learning to Manage and Managing to Learn: The Effects of Student Leadership Service," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(10), pages 3246-3261, October.
    2. Kirthi Kalyanam & John McAteer & Jonathan Marek & James Hodges & Lifeng Lin, 2018. "Cross channel effects of search engine advertising on brick & mortar retail sales: Meta analysis of large scale field experiments on Google.com," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 1-42, March.
    3. Paldam Martin, 2021. "Methods Used in Economic Research: An Empirical Study of Trends and Levels," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 15(1), pages 28-42, January.
    4. Brodeur, Abel & Cook, Nikolai & Heyes, Anthony, 2022. "We Need to Talk about Mechanical Turk: What 22,989 Hypothesis Tests Tell us about p-Hacking and Publication Bias in Online Experiments," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1157, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    5. Rafael Zapata-Lamana & Felipe Poblete-Valderrama & Andres Ledezma-Dames & Patricia Pavón-León & Ana María Leiva & María Trinidad Fuentes-Alvarez & Igor Cigarroa & María Antonia Parra-Rizo, 2022. "Health, Functional Ability, and Environmental Quality as Predictors of Life Satisfaction in Physically Active Older Adults," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-11, June.
    6. Lukas Menkhoff & Maik Schmeling & Ulrich Schmidt, 2010. "Are All Professional Investors Sophisticated?," German Economic Review, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 11(4), pages 418-440, November.
    7. Llopis Abella,Jimena & Fruttero,Anna & Tas,Emcet Oktay & Taj,Umar, 2020. "Urban Design, Public Spaces, and Social Cohesion : Evidence from a Virtual Reality Experiment," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9407, The World Bank.
    8. Pinger, Pia & Ruhmer-Krell, Isabel & Schumacher, Heiner, 2016. "The compromise effect in action: Lessons from a restaurant's menu," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 14-34.
    9. Thomas S. Dee, 2014. "Stereotype Threat And The Student-Athlete," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 52(1), pages 173-182, January.
    10. Chao-Yen Lin & Hsiao-Hsien Lin & Kuo-Chiang Ting & Chih-Chien Shen & Chih-Cheng Lo & Hsiu-Chu Hung & Li-Ju Tsai, 2023. "A Study on the Influence of Recreational Activities Intervening in Natural Science Courses on Learning Motivation and Learning Outcomes—The Case of Tabletop Games," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-13, January.
    11. Warut Khern-am-nuai & Matthew J. Hashim & Alain Pinsonneault & Weining Yang & Ninghui Li, 2023. "Augmenting Password Strength Meter Design Using the Elaboration Likelihood Model: Evidence from Randomized Experiments," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 157-177, March.
    12. Roland G. Fryer & Steven D. Levitt & John A. List, 2008. "Exploring the Impact of Financial Incentives on Stereotype Threat: Evidence from a Pilot Study," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 98(2), pages 370-375, May.
    13. Omar Al-Ubaydli & John A. List, 2013. "On the Generalizability of Experimental Results in Economics: With a Response to Commentors," CESifo Working Paper Series 4543, CESifo.
    14. Francesco Guala & Luigi Mittone & Matteo Ploner, 2012. "Group Membership, Team Preferences, and Expectations (This is a new version of CEEL WP 6-09)," CEEL Working Papers 1203, Cognitive and Experimental Economics Laboratory, Department of Economics, University of Trento, Italia.
    15. Anja Göritz & David Weiss, 2014. "Behavioral and emotional responses to escalating terrorism threat," Mind & Society: Cognitive Studies in Economics and Social Sciences, Springer;Fondazione Rosselli, vol. 13(2), pages 285-295, November.
    16. Mathieu Lefebvre & Pierre Pestieau & Arno Riedl & Marie Claire Villeval, 2013. "Les attitudes sont-elles différentes face à la fraude fiscale et à la fraude sociale ?," Post-Print halshs-00724736, HAL.
    17. Banuri, Sheheryar & Nguyen, Ha, 2023. "Borrowing to keep up (with the Joneses): Inequality, debt, and conspicuous consumption," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 222-242.
    18. Tessa Haesevoets & Alain Van Hiel & Kim Dierckx & Chris Reinders Folmer, 2020. "Do multiple-trial games better reflect prosocial behavior than single-trial games?," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 15(3), pages 330-345, May.
    19. Jean-Louis Bago & Bruce Shearer, 2022. "Risk preferences and contract choices," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 25(5), pages 1374-1398, November.
    20. James Alm & William D. Schulze & Carrie von Bose & Jubo Yan, 2019. "Appeals to Social Norms and Taxpayer Compliance," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 86(2), pages 638-666, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:14:y:2024:i:11:p:221-:d:1507579. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.