IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v13y2023i12p259-d1300859.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Occupational Concepts: An Underutilized Resource to Further Disabled People and Others Being Occupied: A Scoping Review

Author

Listed:
  • Gregor Wolbring

    (Community Rehabilitation and Disability Studies, Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada)

  • Simerta Gill

    (Community Rehabilitation and Disability Studies, Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada)

Abstract

Background: Being occupied is an important factor in human well-being and ranges from paid and unpaid work to activities of daily living. Various occupational concepts that do not contain health in the phrase such as “occupational justice” are employed to engage with the social barriers people experience in being occupied. The aim of this study was to understand better to what extent the non-health occupational concepts are used in the academic literature to discuss the social barriers disabled people face in being occupied and whether these occupational concepts are used to enrich discussions in areas that impact the reality of occupation in general such as equity/equality, diversity and inclusion (EDI), science and technology governance, well-being and the impact of environmental issues. Methods: a scoping review of academic abstracts employing SCOPUS, the 70 databases of EBSCO-HOST and Web of Science was performed. Results: We found 24,104 abstracts for the 28 occupational concepts we used in general and 624 abstracts in conjunction with disability terms. Of these 28 occupational concepts, “occupational performance” was mentioned the most (in 9739 of the 24,104 and 397 of the 624 abstracts). The next concept “occupational engagement” was already present in one tenth or less. Occupational justice was present in 700 of the 24,104 and 14 of the 624 abstracts. Furthermore, within the 24,104 and 624 abstracts EDI, science and technology governance, environmental topics, and well-being measures were rarely or not mentioned. Most of the 624 abstracts originated from occupational therapy journals. Only 23 of the 624 abstracts originated from journals with “disability”, and none with “disability studies” in the title. Conclusion: Non-health occupational concepts are underutilized in discourses that focus on decreasing the social barriers to being occupied in general and in relation to disabled people, which is a missed opportunity and should be fixed.

Suggested Citation

  • Gregor Wolbring & Simerta Gill, 2023. "Occupational Concepts: An Underutilized Resource to Further Disabled People and Others Being Occupied: A Scoping Review," Societies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-43, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:13:y:2023:i:12:p:259-:d:1300859
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/13/12/259/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/13/12/259/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ricardo Pagan, 2016. "Are Relational Goods Important for People with Disabilities?," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 11(4), pages 1117-1135, December.
    2. Mutsumi Teraoka & Makoto Kyougoku, 2015. "Development of the Final Version of the Classification and Assessment of Occupational Dysfunction Scale," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(8), pages 1-13, August.
    3. Chiara Salvatore & Gregor Wolbring, 2021. "Children and Youth Environmental Action: The Case of Children and Youth with Disabilities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-27, September.
    4. Kevin O’Rourke & Ahmed Rahman & Alan Taylor, 2013. "Luddites, the industrial revolution, and the demographic transition," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 373-409, December.
    5. Tsing-Yee (Emily) Chai & Gregor Wolbring, 2016. "The Portrayal of Occupational Therapy and Occupational Science in Canadian Newspapers: A Content Analysis," Societies, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-21, May.
    6. Gregor Wolbring, 2016. "Employment, Disabled People and Robots: What Is the Narrative in the Academic Literature and Canadian Newspapers?," Societies, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-16, April.
    7. Yuki Miyake & Eri Eguchi & Hiroshi Ito & Kazufumi Nakamura & Tatsuo Ito & Kenjiro Nagaoka & Noriyoshi Ogino & Keiki Ogino, 2018. "Association between Occupational Dysfunction and Metabolic Syndrome in Community-Dwelling Japanese Adults in a Cross-Sectional Study: Ibara Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-13, November.
    8. Hyo-Jung Son & Dae-Sik Kim & Sin-Ae Park, 2022. "Horticultural Therapy for Improving the Work Performance and Interpersonal Relationships of Persons with Intellectual Disabilities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-13, October.
    9. Diwan, Ishac & Walton, Michael, 1997. "How International Exchange, Technology, and Institutions Affect Workers: An Introduction," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, January.
    10. Hynninen, Sanna-Mari & Ojala, Jari & Pehkonen, Jaakko, 2013. "Technological change and wage premiums: Historical evidence from linked employer–employee data," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 1-11.
    11. Gregor Wolbring & Aspen Lillywhite, 2023. "Burnout through the Lenses of Equity/Equality, Diversity and Inclusion and Disabled People: A Scoping Review," Societies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-31, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gregor Wolbring & Rochelle Deloria, 2024. "Health Equity and Health Inequity of Disabled People: A Scoping Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-51, August.
    2. Tsion Berie & Sean A. Kidd & Gregor Wolbring, 2024. "Poverty (Number 1 Goal of the SDG) of Disabled People through Disability Studies and Ability Studies Lenses: A Scoping Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-52, July.
    3. Gregor Wolbring & Laiba Nasir & Dana Mahr, 2024. "Academic Coverage of Online Activism of Disabled People: A Scoping Review," Societies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-55, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gregor Wolbring & Maria Escobedo, 2023. "Academic Coverage of Social Stressors Experienced by Disabled People: A Scoping Review," Societies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-31, September.
    2. Gregor Wolbring & Laiba Nasir, 2024. "Intersectionality of Disabled People through a Disability Studies, Ability-Based Studies, and Intersectional Pedagogy Lens: A Survey and a Scoping Review," Societies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-77, September.
    3. Tsion Berie & Sean A. Kidd & Gregor Wolbring, 2024. "Poverty (Number 1 Goal of the SDG) of Disabled People through Disability Studies and Ability Studies Lenses: A Scoping Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-52, July.
    4. Gregor Wolbring & Aspen Lillywhite, 2023. "Coverage of Allies, Allyship and Disabled People: A Scoping Review," Societies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-38, November.
    5. Gregor Wolbring & Rochelle Deloria, 2024. "Health Equity and Health Inequity of Disabled People: A Scoping Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-51, August.
    6. Keisuke Fujii & Yuya Fujii & Yuta Kubo & Korin Tateoka & Jue Liu & Koki Nagata & Shuichi Wakayama & Tomohiro Okura, 2021. "Association between Occupational Dysfunction and Social Isolation in Japanese Older Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-9, June.
    7. Gregor Wolbring & Aspen Lillywhite, 2023. "Burnout through the Lenses of Equity/Equality, Diversity and Inclusion and Disabled People: A Scoping Review," Societies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-31, May.
    8. Gregor Wolbring & Laiba Nasir & Dana Mahr, 2024. "Academic Coverage of Online Activism of Disabled People: A Scoping Review," Societies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-55, October.
    9. Emmanuel Bovari & Victor Court, 2019. "Energy, knowledge, and demo-economic development in the long run: a unified growth model," Working Papers hal-01698755, HAL.
    10. Gregor Wolbring, 2022. "Auditing the ‘Social’ of Quantum Technologies: A Scoping Review," Societies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-38, March.
    11. Antonio Martins-Neto & Nanditha Mathew & Pierre Mohnen & Tania Treibich, 2024. "Is There Job Polarization in Developing Economies? A Review and Outlook," The World Bank Research Observer, World Bank, vol. 39(2), pages 259-288.
    12. Apoorva Ghosh & Pranabesh Ray, 2012. "A Contemporary Model for Industrial Relations," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 37(1), pages 17-30, February.
    13. repec:ilo:ilowps:413498 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Ricardo Pagan, 2020. "Gender and Age Differences in Loneliness: Evidence for People without and with Disabilities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-16, December.
    15. Gregor Wolbring & Lucy Diep, 2016. "The Discussions around Precision Genetic Engineering: Role of and Impact on Disabled People," Laws, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-23, September.
    16. Alexandra M. de Pleijt & Jacob L. Weisdorf, 2017. "Human capital formation from occupations: the ‘deskilling hypothesis’ revisited," Cliometrica, Springer;Cliometric Society (Association Francaise de Cliométrie), vol. 11(1), pages 1-30, January.
    17. Asep Suryahadi, 2001. "Globalization and Wage Inequality in Indonesia: A CGE Analysis," Economics Study Area Working Papers 26, East-West Center, Economics Study Area.
    18. Schneider, Benjamin & Vipond, Hillary, 2023. "The past and future of work: how history can inform the age of automation," Economic History Working Papers 119282, London School of Economics and Political Science, Department of Economic History.
    19. Walheer, Barnabé, 2023. "Meta-frontier and technology switchers: A nonparametric approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(1), pages 463-474.
    20. Seth G. Benzell & Laurence J. Kotlikoff & Guillermo LaGarda & Jeffrey D. Sachs, 2015. "Robots Are Us: Some Economics of Human Replacement," NBER Working Papers 20941, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    21. repec:eee:labchp:v:3:y:1999:i:pb:p:2859-2939 is not listed on IDEAS
    22. Valeria Cirillo & Mario Pianta & Leopoldo Nascia, 2015. "The Dynamics of Skills: Technology and Business Cycles," LEM Papers Series 2015/30, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:13:y:2023:i:12:p:259-:d:1300859. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.