IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v13y2023i11p234-d1272682.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Configurations of Care Work: Fragile Partnerships in the Co-Production of Long-Term Care Services

Author

Listed:
  • Laila Tingvold

    (Centre for Care Research East, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 2815 Gjøvik, Norway)

  • Nina Olsvold

    (Faculty of Health, VID Specialized University, 0370 Oslo, Norway)

Abstract

Over the last decade, authorities in several Western countries have stated their ambitions to increase the share of volunteers contributing alongside professionals in the future long-term care (LTC) sector, but the introduction of volunteers as co-producers of care services is sparsely investigated. This article is based on an empirical case study in Norway and investigates how co-production is translated into practice in diverse settings. Our findings demonstrate that understandings of voluntary work were fragmented. Co-production appears as a fragile partnership with an unclear understanding of the roles, expectations, and opportunities among the various parties who had different purposes/agendas and limited knowledge. To successfully provide added value in coproducing care, agents need to understand the whole picture and context, and build a common understanding of ‘why’ coproduce.

Suggested Citation

  • Laila Tingvold & Nina Olsvold, 2023. "Configurations of Care Work: Fragile Partnerships in the Co-Production of Long-Term Care Services," Societies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-12, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:13:y:2023:i:11:p:234-:d:1272682
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/13/11/234/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/13/11/234/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marjolein I. Broese van Groenou & Alice Boer, 2016. "Providing informal care in a changing society," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 271-279, September.
    2. Adina Dudau & Russ Glennon & Bram Verschuere, 2019. "Following the yellow brick road? (Dis)enchantment with co-design, co-production and value co-creation in public services," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(11), pages 1577-1594, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Costa-Font, Joan & Jiménez-Martín, Sergi & Vilaplana-Prieto, Cristina, 2022. "Do Public Caregiving Subsidies and Supports affect the Provision of Care and Transfers?," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    2. Zhu, Ge, 2024. "Liberated from care: Long-term care insurance policy and Employment for women," MPRA Paper 120472, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Laia Calvó-Perxas & Joan Vilalta-Franch & Howard Litwin & Oriol Turró-Garriga & Pedro Mira & Josep Garre-Olmo, 2018. "What seems to matter in public policy and the health of informal caregivers? A cross-sectional study in 12 European countries," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(3), pages 1-12, March.
    4. Francesca Imperiale & Alessandro Sancino & Roberta Fasiello & Paolo Ricci, 2024. "Governing public heritage assets with civil society: exploring the typologies of collaboration by the dominant actor," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 28(4), pages 1151-1197, December.
    5. Christophe Courbage & Guillem Montoliu-Montes & Joël Wagner, 2020. "The effect of long-term care public benefits and insurance on informal care from outside the household: empirical evidence from Italy and Spain," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 21(8), pages 1131-1147, November.
    6. Kaschowitz, Judith & Brandt, Martina, 2017. "Health effects of informal caregiving across Europe: A longitudinal approach," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 72-80.
    7. Karen Hand & Rebecca Murphy & Malcolm MacLachlan & Stuart Colin Carr, 2022. "Worlds Apart? – The Challenges of Aligning Brand Value for NGO’s," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 19(3), pages 575-598, September.
    8. Aviad Tur-Sinai & Netta Bentur & Paolo Fabbietti & Giovanni Lamura, 2021. "Impact of the Outbreak of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Formal and Informal Care of Community-Dwelling Older Adults: Cross-National Clustering of Empirical Evidence from 23 Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-13, June.
    9. Eline E. Vos & Simone R. de Bruin & Allard J. van der Beek & Karin I. Proper, 2021. "“ It’s Like Juggling, Constantly Trying to Keep All Balls in the Air ”: A Qualitative Study of the Support Needs of Working Caregivers Taking Care of Older Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-18, May.
    10. Giorgio Di Gessa & Baowen Xue & Rebecca Lacey & Anne McMunn, 2022. "Young Adult Carers in the UK—New Evidence from the UK Household Longitudinal Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-13, October.
    11. Lea de Jong & Jan Zeidler & Kathrin Damm, 2022. "A systematic review to identify the use of stated preference research in the field of older adult care," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 1005-1056, December.
    12. Laila Tingvold & Anette Fagertun, 2020. "Between Privileged and Oppressed? Immigrant Labor Trajectories in Norwegian Long-Term Care," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-17, June.
    13. de Aguiar, Ana Raquel Pena & Ramos, Tânia Rodrigues Pereira & Gomes, Maria Isabel, 2023. "Home care routing and scheduling problem with teams’ synchronization," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    14. Noella Edelmann & Ines Mergel, 2021. "Co-Production of Digital Public Services in Austrian Public Administrations," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-21, February.
    15. Eline E. Vos & Henk B. M. Hilderink & Simone R. de Bruin & Allard J. van der Beek & Karin I. Proper, 2022. "The Working Informal Caregiver Model: A Mixed Methods Approach to Explore Future Informal Caregiving by Working Caregivers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-18, March.
    16. Aviad Tur-Sinai & Dafna Halperin & Nissim Ben David & Ariela Lowenstein & Ruth Katz, 2022. "Cessation of Care for Frail Older Adults: Physical, Psychological and Economic Outcomes for Family Carers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-17, March.
    17. Ang, Shannon & Malhotra, Rahul, 2022. "The filial piety paradox: Receiving social support from children can be negatively associated with quality of life," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 303(C).
    18. Jakob D’herde & Wesley Gruijthuijsen & Dominique Vanneste & Veerle Draulans & Hilde Heynen, 2021. "“I Could Not Manage This Long-Term, Absolutely Not.” Aging in Place, Informal Care, COVID-19, and the Neighborhood in Flanders (Belgium)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-14, June.
    19. Tatjana Fischer & Markus Jobst, 2020. "Capturing the Spatial Relatedness of Long-Distance Caregiving: A Mixed-Methods Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-23, September.
    20. Sylvie Bonin-Guillaume & Sylvie Arlotto & Alice Blin & Stéphanie Gentile, 2022. "Family Caregiver’s Loneliness and Related Health Factors: What Can Be Changed?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-9, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:13:y:2023:i:11:p:234-:d:1272682. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.