IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v10y2020i4p79-d428197.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dealignment: Class in Britain and Class in British Sociology Since 1945

Author

Listed:
  • Ken Roberts

    (Law and Social Justice Building, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZA, UK)

Abstract

This paper sets changes in Britain’s class structure since 1945 alongside the parallel sociological controversies about class. Since the 1970s, the class scheme developed by John Goldthorpe and colleagues for initial use in their study of social mobility in Britain has become sociology’s standard template for thinking about and researching class. Versions have been adopted by the UK government and the European Union as their official socio-economic classifications. This paper does not dispute that the Goldthorpe scheme is still the best available for classifying by occupation, or that occupation remains our best single indicator of class, or that a constant class scheme must be used if the purpose is to measure trends over time in rates of relative inter-generational mobility. Despite these merits, it is argued that the sociological gaze has been weakened by failing to represent changes over time in the class structure itself and, therefore, how class is experienced in lay people’s lives. There has been a relative neglect of absolute social mobility flows (which have changed over time), and a pre-occupation with the inter-generational and a relative neglect of intra-career mobilities and immobilities.

Suggested Citation

  • Ken Roberts, 2020. "Dealignment: Class in Britain and Class in British Sociology Since 1945," Societies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-13, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:10:y:2020:i:4:p:79-:d:428197
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/10/4/79/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/10/4/79/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hazel Conley, 2002. "A State of Insecurity: Temporary Work in the Public Services," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 16(4), pages 725-737, December.
    2. Jenkins, Stephen P., 2015. "The income distribution in the UK: a picture of advantage and disadvantage," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 103980, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Robert M. Blackburn, 1998. "A New System of Classes: But What are they and Do We Need Them?," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 12(4), pages 735-741, December.
    4. David Rose, 1998. "Once more Unto the Breach: In Defence of Class Analysis Yet Again," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 12(4), pages 755-767, December.
    5. Bukodi, Erzsébet & Goldthorpe, John H. & Waller, Lorraine & Kuha, Jouni, 2015. "The mobility problem in Britain: new findings from the analysis of birth cohort data," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 60249, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Geoff Payne, 1987. "Mobility and Social Class," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Employment and Opportunity, chapter 8, pages 189-192, Palgrave Macmillan.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rémi Bazillier & Jérôme Héricourt & Samuel Ligonnière, 2017. "Structure of Income Inequality and Household Leverage: Theory and Cross-Country Evidence," Working Papers 2017-01, CEPII research center.
    2. Yaojun Li & Mike Savage & Andrew Pickles, 2003. "‘Social Change, Friendship and Civic Participation’," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 8(4), pages 111-127, November.
    3. Max Haller & Anja Eder & Erwin Stolz, 2016. "Ethnic Stratification and Patterns of Income Inequality Around the World: A Cross-National Comparison of 123 Countries, Based on a New Index of Historic Ethnic Exploitation," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 128(3), pages 1047-1084, September.
    4. Longhi, Simonetta & Brynin, Malcolm, 2010. "Occupational change in Britain and Germany," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(4), pages 655-666, August.
    5. Mullan, Killian & Egerton, Muriel, 2006. "An analysis and monetary valuation of formal and informal voluntary work by gender and educational attainment," ISER Working Paper Series 2006-22, Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    6. Christian Grund & Kirsten Thommes, 2017. "The Role of Contract Types for Employees’ Public Service Motivation," Schmalenbach Business Review, Springer;Schmalenbach-Gesellschaft, vol. 18(4), pages 377-398, October.
    7. Driouchi, Ahmed & Gamar, Alae, 2016. "The Gap between Educational & Social Intergenerational Mobility in Arab Countries," MPRA Paper 73998, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Yaojun Li & Frank Bechhofer & Robert Stewart & David McCrone & Michael Anderson & Lynn Jamieson, 2002. "A Divided Working Class? Planning and Career Perception in the Service and Working Classes," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 16(4), pages 617-636, December.
    9. Yaojun Li, 2018. "Integration Journey: The Social Mobility Trajectory of Ethnic Minority Groups in Britain," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(3), pages 270-281.
    10. David Chant & Mark Western, 1991. "The Analysis of Mobility Regimes," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 20(2), pages 256-286, November.
    11. Richard Breen & Christopher T. Whelan, 1992. "Modelling Trends in Social Fluidity: The Core Model and a Measured Variable Approach. Published in European Sociological Review, Vol 10 No 3," Papers WP040, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    12. Marianna Filandri & Manuela Olagnero, 2014. "Housing Inequality and Social Class in Europe," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(7), pages 977-993, October.
    13. Juliet Stone & Ann Berrington & Jane Falkingham, 2014. "Gender, Turning Points, and Boomerangs: Returning Home in Young Adulthood in Great Britain," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 51(1), pages 257-276, February.
    14. Macmillan, Lindsey & Mcknight, Abigail Ann, 2022. "Understanding recent patterns in intergenerational social mobility: differences by gender, ethnicity, education, and their intersections," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 121554, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    15. Tien‐Hui Chiang, 2021. "What Freirean Critical Pedagogy Says and Overlooks from a Durkheimian Perspective," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(4), pages 1-11.
    16. Adriana Duta & Cristina Iannelli, 2018. "Social Class Inequalities in Graduates’ Labour Market Outcomes: The Role of Spatial Job Opportunities," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-18, October.
    17. Geoffrey Evans & Colin Mills, 1998. "Assessing the Cross-Sex Validity of the Goldthorpe Class Schema Using Log-linear Models with Latent Variables," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 275-296, August.
    18. Gush, Karon & Laurie, Heather & Scott, James, 2015. "Job loss and social capital: the role of family, friends and wider support networks," ISER Working Paper Series 2015-07, Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    19. Lindsey Macmillan & Abigail McKnight, 2022. "Understanding recent patterns in intergenerational social mobility: differences by gender, ethnicity, education, and their intersections," CASE - Social Policies and Distributional Outcomes Research Papers 11, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    20. Bazillier, Rémi & Héricourt, Jérôme & Ligonnière, Samuel, 2021. "Structure of income inequality and household leverage: Cross-country causal evidence," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:10:y:2020:i:4:p:79-:d:428197. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.