IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v9y2020i4p56-d348454.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Structural Equation Models on the Satisfaction and Motivation for Retirement of Spanish University Professors

Author

Listed:
  • Rosalía Romero Tena

    (Department of Didactics and School Organization, Faculty of Education Sciences, University of Seville, 41013 Seville, Spain)

  • Cristina Mayor Ruiz

    (Department of Didactics and School Organization, Faculty of Education Sciences, University of Seville, 41013 Seville, Spain)

  • Carmen Yot Domínguez

    (Department of Didactics and School Organization, Faculty of Education Sciences, University of Seville, 41013 Seville, Spain
    Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Isabel I University, 09003 Burgos, Spain)

  • Manuel Chaves Maza

    (Department of Economics, Quantitative Methods and Economics History Pablo de Olavide University, 41013 Seville, Spain)

Abstract

Research on the motives behind a university professor’s decision to retire is scarce. In the present work, we have tried to define and delimit the aspects of the university professor’s satisfaction that have an influence on their motivation to retire. Nine hundred and one Spanish university professors answered the Inventory “Questionnaire for Active, Retired and Emeritus University Professors.” In the analysis, three structural equations were estimated. The overall sample, as well as the professional status subsamples—active or not active—were taken into account. Significant differences were found according to the work status. Three dimensions explained the satisfaction: economic, professional, and relational. The satisfaction of the professors in each of them had an influence on their decision to retire. Work conditions created by the European Higher Education Area (EHEA) and work conditions due to the educational and/or university laws determined the economic satisfaction to a greater degree. The possibilities of being part of professional networks or teams, and of publishing and disseminating knowledge, have a considerable impact on professional satisfaction. Relational satisfaction was notable for predicting the motivation to retire. Relationships with colleagues had an effect on the relational satisfaction. Policies for improving the satisfaction of the university professors could help delay the exit of talented professors, who are part of the human capital of the universities.

Suggested Citation

  • Rosalía Romero Tena & Cristina Mayor Ruiz & Carmen Yot Domínguez & Manuel Chaves Maza, 2020. "Structural Equation Models on the Satisfaction and Motivation for Retirement of Spanish University Professors," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-19, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:9:y:2020:i:4:p:56-:d:348454
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/9/4/56/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/9/4/56/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kathleen Arano & Carl Parker, 2016. "The great recession and changes in faculty expected retirement age," Journal of Economics and Finance, Springer;Academy of Economics and Finance, vol. 40(1), pages 127-136, January.
    2. Barry Bozeman & Monica Gaughan, 2011. "Job Satisfaction among University Faculty: Individual, Work, and Institutional Determinants," The Journal of Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 82(2), pages 154-186, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ping Zhao & Jing Yuan & Yongmei Hu, 2024. "Work Hours, Job Resources and Subjective Well-Being of Chinese Faculty: An Empirical Analysis Based on a Sequential Mediation Model," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 65(5), pages 965-988, August.
    2. Catherine P. Slade & Saundra J. Ribando & C. Kevin Fortner, 2016. "Faculty research following merger: a job stress and social identity theory perspective," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 107(1), pages 71-89, April.
    3. Jung, Jiwon & Bozeman, Barry & Gaughan, Monica, 2017. "Impact of research collaboration cosmopolitanism on job satisfaction," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(10), pages 1863-1872.
    4. Joaquín M. Azagra-Caro & Carlos Benito-Amat & Ester Planells-Aleixandre, 2022. "Academic artists’ engagement and commercialisation," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 1273-1296, August.
    5. Adam R. Szromek & Radosław Wolniak, 2020. "Job Satisfaction and Problems among Academic Staff in Higher Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-38, June.
    6. Carolina Cañibano & Richard Woolley & Eric J. Iversen & Sybille Hinze & Stefan Hornbostel & Jakob Tesch, 2019. "A conceptual framework for studying science research careers," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 44(6), pages 1964-1992, December.
    7. Lars P. Feld & Sarah Necker & Bruno S. Frey, 2015. "Happiness of economists," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(10), pages 990-1007, February.
    8. Sahil Verma & Gurvinder Kaur, 2023. "Exploring Factors of HR Climate and Their Influence on Faculty Retention: Unfolding HRM in Indian Higher Educational Settings," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(2), pages 21582440231, April.
    9. Yvette E. Hofmann & Maria Strobel, 2020. "Transparency goes a long way: information transparency and its effect on job satisfaction and turnover intentions of the professoriate," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 90(5), pages 713-732, June.
    10. Jon Olaskoaga-Larrauri & Carmen Enedina Rodríguez-Armenta & Elia Marúm-Espinosa, 2022. "Disagreement in the Conceptualization of Educational Quality and Job Satisfaction," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-14, June.
    11. Spencer, Marilyn & Gevrek, Deniz & Chambers, Valrie & Bowden, Randall, 2015. "Labor Supply and Productivity Responses to Non-Salary Benefits: Do They Work? If So, at What Level Do They Work Best?," IZA Discussion Papers 9153, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    12. Mario Coccia, 2018. "How do public research labs use funding for research? A case study," Papers 1805.11932, arXiv.org.
    13. Mohammed Issah, 2021. "Perception of Fit and Job Satisfaction Among Administrative Staff in a Mid-Western University in the United States of America," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440211, June.
    14. KerryAnn O’Meara & Audrey Jaeger & Joya Misra & Courtney Lennartz & Alexandra Kuvaeva, 2018. "Undoing disparities in faculty workloads: A randomized trial experiment," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(12), pages 1-15, December.
    15. Joaquín M. Azagra-Caro & Laura González-Salmerón & Pedro Marques, 2021. "Fiction lagging behind or non-fiction defending the indefensible? University–industry (et al.) interaction in science fiction," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 46(6), pages 1889-1916, December.
    16. Shmatko, Natalia & Katchanov, Yurij & Volkova, Galina, 2020. "The value of PhD in the changing world of work: Traditional and alternative research careers," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    17. Abdullah M. Abu-Tineh & Michael H. Romanowski & Youmen Chaaban & Hadeel Alkhatib & Norma Ghamrawi & Yousef M. Alshaboul, 2023. "Career Advancement, Job Satisfaction, Career Retention, and Other Related Dimensions for Sustainability: A Perception Study of Qatari Public School Teachers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-15, March.
    18. Karen L. Webber & Samantha M. Rogers, 2018. "Gender Differences in Faculty Member Job Satisfaction: Equity Forestalled?," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 59(8), pages 1105-1132, December.
    19. Levecque, Katia & Anseel, Frederik & De Beuckelaer, Alain & Van der Heyden, Johan & Gisle, Lydia, 2017. "Work organization and mental health problems in PhD students," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(4), pages 868-879.
    20. Eric E. Griffith & Nilanjana Dasgupta, 2018. "How the Demographic Composition of Academic Science and Engineering Departments Influences Workplace Culture, Faculty Experience, and Retention Risk," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-25, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:9:y:2020:i:4:p:56-:d:348454. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.