IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v8y2019i9p252-d263537.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Geographical Juxtaposition: A New Direction in CPTED

Author

Listed:
  • Paul Cozens

    (School of Design and the Built Environment, Faculty of Humanities, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA 6845, Australia)

  • Terence Love

    (Design Out Crime and CPTED Centre, 14 Michael St, Beaconsfield, WA 6162, Australia)

  • Brent Davern

    (School of Design and the Built Environment, Faculty of Humanities, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA 6845, Australia)

Abstract

This paper explores Oscar Newman’s Defensible Space (1972) concept of geographical juxtaposition (GJ) highlighting a significant lack of research within the criminological literature over the last 50 years. We argue the concept is a key foundation in understanding crime and crime prevention theories and in developing crime prevention strategies. Findings from a systematic review of the literature are presented to illustrate the paucity of research into geographical juxtaposition. We develop and extend the concept of geographical juxtaposition beyond that originally coined by Newman to include all immediate, local, distant, and remote environmental (physical) factors. Additionally, we demonstrate, by reference to practical criminological situations, the significant and extensive role of our revised concept of geographical juxtaposition. In particular, we point to the way that focusing on geographical juxtaposition identifies serious problems in many taken-for-granted assumptions in planning theory and practice. In exploring the concept of geographical juxtaposition, we highlight ten ways it can affect crime risks and six ways using geographical juxtaposition can benefit efforts to apply crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED) more successfully when conducting a crime risk assessment. Finally, this paper briefly discusses four new CPTED principles, which emerge from our exploration of geographical juxtaposition. We identify new classes of CPTED methods and new ways of analyzing crime and offer the basis for new criminological theories.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul Cozens & Terence Love & Brent Davern, 2019. "Geographical Juxtaposition: A New Direction in CPTED," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-22, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:8:y:2019:i:9:p:252-:d:263537
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/8/9/252/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/8/9/252/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul Cozens, 2011. "Urban Planning and Environmental Criminology: Towards a New Perspective for Safer Cities," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(4), pages 481-508.
    2. Mateja Mihinjac & Gregory Saville, 2019. "Third-Generation Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED)," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-20, June.
    3. Ellen, Ingrid Gould & Lacoe, Johanna & Sharygin, Claudia Ayanna, 2013. "Do foreclosures cause crime?," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 59-70.
    4. Spelman, William, 1993. "Abandoned buildings: Magnets for crime?," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 21(5), pages 481-495.
    5. Johanna Lacoe & Ingrid Gould Ellen, 2015. "Mortgage Foreclosures and the Changing Mix of Crime in Micro-Neighborhoods," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 93858cf01b5a4446b4060d29f, Mathematica Policy Research.
    6. Phillips, David C. & Sandler, Danielle, 2015. "Does public transit spread crime? Evidence from temporary rail station closures," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 13-26.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Spader, Jonathan & Schuetz, Jenny & Cortes, Alvaro, 2016. "Fewer vacants, fewer crimes? Impacts of neighborhood revitalization policies on crime," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 73-84.
    2. Michelle Kondo & Michelle Degli Esposti & Jonathan Jay & Christopher N. Morrison & Bridget Freisthler & Claire Jones & Jingzhen Yang & Deena Chisolm & Charles Branas & Bernadette Hohl, 2022. "Changes in crime surrounding an urban home renovation and rebuild programme," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(5), pages 1011-1030, April.
    3. Twinam, Tate, 2017. "Danger zone: Land use and the geography of neighborhood crime," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 104-119.
    4. Bernstein, Shai & Colonnelli, Emanuele & Giroud, Xavier & Iverson, Benjamin, 2019. "Bankruptcy spillovers," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(3), pages 608-633.
    5. Camila Alvayay Torrejón & Dusan Paredes & Mark Skidmore, 2023. "Impact of demolitions on neighboring property values in Detroit," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(5), pages 1073-1099, November.
    6. Nicolás González-Pampillón, 2019. "Spillover effects from new housing supply," CEP Discussion Papers dp1660, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    7. Johanna Lacoe & Ingrid Gould Ellen, 2014. "Mortgage Foreclosures and the Shifting Context of Crime in Micro-Neighborhoods," Working Paper 9315, USC Lusk Center for Real Estate.
    8. Gonzalez Pampillon, Nicolas, 2019. "Spillover effects from new housing supply," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 103446, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    9. Janelle Downing & Andrew Karter & Hector Rodriguez & William H Dow & Nancy Adler & Dean Schillinger & Margaret Warton & Barbara Laraia, 2016. "No Spillover Effect of the Foreclosure Crisis on Weight Change: The Diabetes Study of Northern California (DISTANCE)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-11, March.
    10. González-Pampillón, Nicolás, 2022. "Spillover effects from new housing supply," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 112932, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    11. Renee Zahnow & Jonathan Corcoran & Anthony Kimpton & Rebecca Wickes, 2022. "Neighbourhood places, collective efficacy and crime: A longitudinal perspective," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(4), pages 789-809, March.
    12. González-Pampillón, Nicolás, 2022. "Spillover effects from new housing supply," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    13. Trajkovski, Samantha & Zabel, Jeffrey & Schwartz, Amy Ellen, 2021. "Do school buses make school choice work?," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    14. Plerhoples, Christina, 2012. "The Effect of Vacant Building Demolitions on Crime under Depopulation," 2012 Annual Meeting, August 12-14, 2012, Seattle, Washington 125003, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    15. Keith Ihlanfeldt & Tom Mayock, 2016. "The Variance in Foreclosure Spillovers across Neighborhood Types," Public Finance Review, , vol. 44(1), pages 80-108, January.
    16. John P. Harding & Jing Li & Stuart S. Rosenthal & Xirui Zhang, 2022. "Forced moves and home maintenance: The amplifying effects of mortgage payment burden on underwater homeowners," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 50(2), pages 498-533, June.
    17. Klaudia Kubalova & Tomáš Loveček, 2023. "Crime Prevention through Environmental Design of Railway Stations as a Specific Soft Target," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-24, March.
    18. Jin-Wook Lee & Jong-Sang Sung, 2017. "Conflicts of Interest and Change in Original Intent: A Case Study of Vacant and Abandoned Homes Repurposed as Community Gardens in a Shrinking City, Daegu, South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-15, November.
    19. Prener, Chris & Braswell, Taylor & Monti, Daniel J., 2018. "St. Louis's "Urban Prairie": Vacant Land and the Potential for Revitalization," SocArXiv bc7eh, Center for Open Science.
    20. Grace Abou Jaoude & Majd Murad & Olaf Mumm & Vanessa Miriam Carlow, 2024. "Operationalizing the open city concept: A case study of Berlin," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 51(3), pages 721-744, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:8:y:2019:i:9:p:252-:d:263537. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.