IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v51y2024i3p721-744.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Operationalizing the open city concept: A case study of Berlin

Author

Listed:
  • Grace Abou Jaoude
  • Majd Murad
  • Olaf Mumm
  • Vanessa Miriam Carlow

Abstract

Framed by a utopian rhetoric, the Open City emerges as a potential guiding principle to the contradictory tendencies and calamities of cities. As an elusive concept with a panoply of context-bound interpretations, the Open City is an open-ended project that manifests through different situations across the city. The article aims to explore different attributes of the Open City, in the context of Berlin, based on a thorough literature review and operationalizes the concept using a systematized approach. Results revealed that openness in Berlin followed a center-periphery pattern, where areas that fostered a high degree of openness were mostly found in inner-city neighborhoods while a lower potential of openness prevailed along the edges. By analyzing the conditions of openness in relation to the built environment, we sought to contribute toward a better understanding of the Open City concept and provide an approach for analyzing openness that can be adapted to different geographic contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Grace Abou Jaoude & Majd Murad & Olaf Mumm & Vanessa Miriam Carlow, 2024. "Operationalizing the open city concept: A case study of Berlin," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 51(3), pages 721-744, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:51:y:2024:i:3:p:721-744
    DOI: 10.1177/23998083231196016
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23998083231196016
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23998083231196016?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shailendra Bisht & Vishal Mishra & Sanjay Fuloria, 2010. "Measuring Accessibility for Inclusive Development: A Census Based Index," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 98(1), pages 167-181, August.
    2. repec:eme:ijhma0:ijhma-05-2016-0031 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Susanne Soederberg, 2017. "Governing stigmatised space: the case of the ‘slums’ of Berlin-Neukölln," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(5), pages 478-495, September.
    4. Detlev Ipsen, 2005. "The Socio‐spatial Conditions of the Open City: A Theoretical Sketch," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 644-653, September.
    5. Philipp Schäfer & Jens Hirsch, 2017. "Do urban tourism hotspots affect Berlin housing rents?," International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 10(2), pages 231-255, April.
    6. Andreina Seijas & Mirik Milan Gelders, 2021. "Governing the night-time city: The rise of night mayors as a new form of urban governance after dark," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(2), pages 316-334, February.
    7. Delclòs-Alió, Xavier & Miralles-Guasch, Carme, 2018. "Looking at Barcelona through Jane Jacobs’s eyes: Mapping the basic conditions for urban vitality in a Mediterranean conurbation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 505-517.
    8. Manaugh, Kevin & Kreider, Tyler, 2013. "What is mixed use? Presenting an interaction method for measuring land use mix," The Journal of Transport and Land Use, Center for Transportation Studies, University of Minnesota, vol. 6(1), pages 63-72.
    9. Paul Cozens, 2011. "Urban Planning and Environmental Criminology: Towards a New Perspective for Safer Cities," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(4), pages 481-508.
    10. Silvano De la Llata, 2021. "Spaces of Becoming: Lessons for Planners from the Square Movements," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(1), pages 90-107, January.
    11. Andy Merrifield, 2013. "The Urban Question under Planetary Urbanization," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(3), pages 909-922, May.
    12. David Harvey, 2003. "The right to the city," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(4), pages 939-941, December.
    13. Lawrence J. Vale & Shomon Shamsuddin, 2017. "All Mixed Up: Making Sense of Mixed-Income Housing Developments," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 83(1), pages 56-67, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paköz, Muhammed Ziya & Yaratgan, Dilara & Şahin, Aydan, 2022. "Re-mapping urban vitality through Jane Jacobs’ criteria: The case of Kayseri, Turkey," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    2. Fancello, Giovanna & Tsoukiàs, Alexis, 2021. "Learning urban capabilities from behaviours. A focus on visitors values for urban planning," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    3. Jesús M. González-Pérez, 2022. "Evictions, Foreclosures, and Global Housing Speculation in Palma, Spain," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-26, February.
    4. Hillary Angelo & David Wachsmuth, 2015. "Urbanizing Urban Political Ecology: A Critique of Methodological Cityism," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(1), pages 16-27, January.
    5. Clara Irazábal, 2009. "One Size Does Not Fit All: Land Markets and Property Rights for the Construction of the Just City," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 558-563, June.
    6. Xingjian Liu & Ying Long, 2016. "Automated identification and characterization of parcels with OpenStreetMap and points of interest," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 43(2), pages 341-360, March.
    7. Letizia Appolloni & Alberto Giretti & Maria Vittoria Corazza & Daniela D’Alessandro, 2020. "Walkable Urban Environments: An Ergonomic Approach of Evaluation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-31, October.
    8. IOVINO, Giorgia, 2017. "Waterfront Urbani: Approcci Rigenerativi e Visioni di Città," CELPE Discussion Papers 148, CELPE - CEnter for Labor and Political Economics, University of Salerno, Italy.
    9. Kostas Rontos & Barbara Ermini & Luca Salvati, 2023. "Enlarging the divide? Per-Capita Income as a measure of social inequalities in a southern European City," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 345-361, February.
    10. Maria-Lluïsa Marsal-Llacuna, 2016. "City Indicators on Social Sustainability as Standardization Technologies for Smarter (Citizen-Centered) Governance of Cities," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 128(3), pages 1193-1216, September.
    11. Byron Miller & Samuel Mössner, 2020. "Urban sustainability and counter-sustainability: Spatial contradictions and conflicts in policy and governance in the Freiburg and Calgary metropolitan regions," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(11), pages 2241-2262, August.
    12. Christoph Lambio & Tillman Schmitz & Richard Elson & Jeffrey Butler & Alexandra Roth & Silke Feller & Nicolai Savaskan & Tobia Lakes, 2023. "Exploring the Spatial Relative Risk of COVID-19 in Berlin-Neukölln," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(10), pages 1-22, May.
    13. K. C. Ho, 2021. "Land and Housing in Singapore: Three Conversations with Anne Haila," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 80(2), pages 325-351, March.
    14. Steven R Gehrke & Kelly J Clifton, 2019. "An activity-related land use mix construct and its connection to pedestrian travel," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 46(1), pages 9-26, January.
    15. Cindi Katz, 2021. "Splanetary Urbanization," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(4), pages 597-611, July.
    16. Junxi Qian, 2015. "No right to the street: Motorcycle taxis, discourse production and the regulation of unruly mobility," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(15), pages 2922-2947, November.
    17. Pérez-Sánchez, Laura À. & Velasco-Fernández, Raúl & Giampietro, Mario, 2022. "Factors and actions for the sustainability of the residential sector. The nexus of energy, materials, space, and time use," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    18. Alice Evans, 2019. "How Cities Erode Gender Inequality: A New Theory and Evidence from Cambodia," CID Working Papers 356, Center for International Development at Harvard University.
    19. Murray, Michael, 2013. "Economic Democracy," MPRA Paper 49755, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Juliet Carpenter & Christina Horvath & Ben Spencer, 2021. "Co-Creation as an agonistic practice in the favela of Santa Marta, Rio de Janeiro," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(9), pages 1906-1923, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:51:y:2024:i:3:p:721-744. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.