IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v147y2024ics0264837724003107.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing effectiveness of point of interest data and land use data in theft crime modelling: A case study in Beijing

Author

Listed:
  • Feng, Jiajia
  • Liang, Yuebing
  • Hao, Qi
  • Xu, Ke
  • Qiu, Waishan

Abstract

To promote the healthy development of cities, previous studies have long investigated the relationships between urban functions and crime. However, the use of either land use data or point of interest (POI) data to represent urban functions can yield inconsistent findings, potentially misguiding urban planners in crime prevention efforts. To address this issue, we systematically compare the effectiveness of land use and POI data in theft crime modeling with a case study of Beijing, China. Urban function features are constructed from both data sources by three measures, i.e., density, fraction, and diversity. Their global strengths are evaluated through negative binomial regression (NBR). Additionally, geographically weighted negative binomial regression (GWNBR) is employed to uncover their local strengths. Results indicate that POI data generally outperform land use data, with POI densities being the most effective. Nevertheless, optimal data sources and measures vary for urban functions and spatial context. Land use fractions could effectively capture large-scale functional areas, while POI fractions and POI densities are fit for small-scale facilities with distinct properties. This study advocates the complementary use of land use and POI data, offering valuable insights for urban planners and researchers to construct precise urban function indicators for crime modeling.

Suggested Citation

  • Feng, Jiajia & Liang, Yuebing & Hao, Qi & Xu, Ke & Qiu, Waishan, 2024. "Comparing effectiveness of point of interest data and land use data in theft crime modelling: A case study in Beijing," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:147:y:2024:i:c:s0264837724003107
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107357
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837724003107
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107357?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cameron,A. Colin & Trivedi,Pravin K., 2013. "Regression Analysis of Count Data," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107667273, November.
    2. Wang, Ruoxuan & Wu, Jianping & Qi, Geqi, 2022. "Exploring regional sustainable commuting patterns based on dockless bike-sharing data and POI data," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    3. Junjie Wu & Jian Zhang & Huixia Zhang & Zaoli Yang, 2022. "Urban Functional Area Recognition Based on Unbalanced Clustering," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2022, pages 1-13, September.
    4. Paul Cozens & Terence Love & Brent Davern, 2019. "Geographical Juxtaposition: A New Direction in CPTED," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-22, September.
    5. Wang, Jia & Hu, Jun & Shen, Shifei & Zhuang, Jun & Ni, Shunjiang, 2020. "Crime risk analysis through big data algorithm with urban metrics," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 545(C).
    6. Patrik Silva & Lin Li, 2020. "Urban Crime Occurrences in Association with Built Environment Characteristics: An African Case with Implications for Urban Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-23, April.
    7. Vomfell, Lara & Härdle, Wolfgang Karl & Lessmann, Stefan, 2018. "Improving Crime Count Forecasts Using Twitter and Taxi Data," IRTG 1792 Discussion Papers 2018-013, Humboldt University of Berlin, International Research Training Group 1792 "High Dimensional Nonstationary Time Series".
    8. Twinam, Tate, 2017. "Danger zone: Land use and the geography of neighborhood crime," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 104-119.
    9. Batabyal, Amitrajeet A. & Beladi, Hamid, 2022. "A political-economy perspective on mayoral elections and urban crime," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    10. Steinberg, Matthew P. & Ukert, Benjamin & MacDonald, John M., 2019. "Schools as places of crime? Evidence from closing chronically underperforming schools," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 125-140.
    11. Kim, Young-An & Hipp, John R., 2021. "Density, diversity, and design: Three measures of the built environment and the spatial patterns of crime in street segments," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    12. Alves, Luiz G.A. & Ribeiro, Haroldo V. & Rodrigues, Francisco A., 2018. "Crime prediction through urban metrics and statistical learning," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 505(C), pages 435-443.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ganguly, Prasangsha & Mukherjee, Sayanti, 2021. "A multifaceted risk assessment approach using statistical learning to evaluate socio-environmental factors associated with regional felony and misdemeanor rates," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 574(C).
    2. Luiz Paulo Fávero & Joseph F. Hair & Rafael de Freitas Souza & Matheus Albergaria & Talles V. Brugni, 2021. "Zero-Inflated Generalized Linear Mixed Models: A Better Way to Understand Data Relationships," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-28, May.
    3. Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti & Luca Pedini, 2020. "ParMA: Parallelised Bayesian Model Averaging for Generalised Linear Models," Working Papers 2020:28, Department of Economics, University of Venice "Ca' Foscari".
    4. Landry, Craig E. & Shonkwiler, J. Scott & Whitehead, John C., 2020. "Economic Values of Coastal Erosion Management: Joint Estimation of Use and Existence Values with recreation demand and contingent valuation data," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    5. Mónica Moreno-Gutiérrez & Víctor Hernández-Trejo & Ramón Valdivia-Alcalá & Judith Juárez-Mancilla & Plácido Roberto Cruz-Chávez & Ulianov Jakes-Cota, 2024. "Linking Tourist Willingness to Pay and Beach Management: A Travel Cost Analysis for Balandra Marine Park, Mexico," Tourism and Hospitality, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-20, October.
    6. Ghosh, Prasenjit & Rong, Jian & Khanna, Madhu & Wang, Weiwei & Miao, Ruiqing, 2017. "Have They Gone with the Wind? Indirect Effects of Wind Turbines on Bird Abundance," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 258100, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    7. Mullahy, John, 2024. "Analyzing health outcomes measured as bounded counts," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    8. Michel Beine & Ilan Noy & Christopher Parsons, 2021. "Climate change, migration and voice," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 167(1), pages 1-27, July.
    9. Christian Kleiber & Achim Zeileis, 2016. "Visualizing Count Data Regressions Using Rootograms," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 70(3), pages 296-303, July.
    10. D M Zimmer, 2023. "The effect of food stamps on fibre intake," Economic Issues Journal Articles, Economic Issues, vol. 28(2), pages 71-86, September.
    11. Jasna Atanasijević & Miloš Božović, 2016. "Exchange Rate as a Determinant of Corporate Loan Defaults in a Euroized Economy: Evidence from Micro-Level Data," Eastern European Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(3), pages 228-250, May.
    12. Syed Muhammad All-E-Raza Rizvi & Marie-Ange Véganzonès-Varoudakis, 2019. "Economic, social, and institutional determinants of domestic conflict in fragile States," Working Papers hal-02340977, HAL.
    13. Kyriakos Drivas & Constantine Iliopoulos, 2017. "An Empirical Investigation in the Relationship Between PDOs/PGIs and Trademarks," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 8(2), pages 585-595, June.
    14. J. M. C. Santos Silva & Silvana Tenreyro, 2022. "The Log of Gravity at 15," Portuguese Economic Journal, Springer;Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestao, vol. 21(3), pages 423-437, September.
    15. Vidhura Tennekoon, 2017. "Counting unreported abortions: A binomial-thinned zero-inflated Poisson model," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 36(2), pages 41-72.
    16. Holger Breinlich & Dennis Novy & J. M. C. Santos Silva, 2024. "Trade, Gravity, and Aggregation," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 106(5), pages 1418-1426, September.
    17. Rik L. Rozendaal & Herman R. J. Vollebergh, 2021. "Policy-Induced Innovation in Clean Technologies: Evidence from the Car Market," CESifo Working Paper Series 9422, CESifo.
    18. Oliver Westerwinter, 2021. "Transnational public-private governance initiatives in world politics: Introducing a new dataset," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 137-174, January.
    19. Geoffroy Enjolras & Philippe Madiès, 2020. "The role of bank analysts and scores in the prediction of financial distress: Evidence from French farms," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 40(4), pages 2978-2993.
    20. Xu Wang & Xiaobo Zhang & Zhuan Xie & Huang Yiping, 2016. "Roads to Innovation: Firm-Level Evidence from China," Working Papers id:11121, eSocialSciences.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:147:y:2024:i:c:s0264837724003107. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.