IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v8y2019i5p132-d226751.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of the Psychometric Properties of the Motivation and Strategies of Learning Questionnaire—Short Form (MSLQ-SF) in Spanish Higher Education Students

Author

Listed:
  • Felix Zurita Ortega

    (Department of Didactics of Musical, Plastic and Corporal Expression, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain)

  • Asuncion Martinez Martinez

    (Department of Research and Diagnosis Methods in Education, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain)

  • Ramon Chacon Cuberos

    (Department of Research and Diagnosis Methods in Education, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain)

  • Jose Luis Ubago Jiménez

    (Department of Didactics of Musical, Plastic and Corporal Expression, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain)

Abstract

Background and methods: The aim of this research was to analyze the psychometric properties of the Motivation and Learning Strategies Questionnaire-Short Form (MSLQ-SF), using exploratory techniques with university students. The sample was formed by 597 participants aged between 19 and 28 years old (M = 23.04; SD = 3.71), with 156 (26.1%) being male and 441 (73.9%) being female. The exploratory factor analysis was conducted using the FACTOR program. Results: The results indicate that the questionnaire provides high reliability indexes to α = 0.70 for all included dimensions. The factor describing intrinsic orientation towards goal setting was removed following exploratory analysis, while other factors adjusted satisfactorily. All factors were correlated directly and positively ( p < 0.01). Conclusions: It can be concluded that the MSLQ-SF fulfils the validity and reliability specifications for use with university students of social sciences and health sciences.

Suggested Citation

  • Felix Zurita Ortega & Asuncion Martinez Martinez & Ramon Chacon Cuberos & Jose Luis Ubago Jiménez, 2019. "Analysis of the Psychometric Properties of the Motivation and Strategies of Learning Questionnaire—Short Form (MSLQ-SF) in Spanish Higher Education Students," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-11, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:8:y:2019:i:5:p:132-:d:226751
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/8/5/132/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/8/5/132/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mariya Neycheva, 2016. "Secondary versus higher education for growth: the case of three countries with different human capital’s structure and quality," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 50(6), pages 2367-2393, November.
    2. Ren-Hung Hwang & Hsin-Tung Lin & Jerry Chih-Yuan Sun & Jang-Jiin Wu, 2019. "Improving Learning Achievement in Science Education for Elementary School Students via Blended Learning," International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design (IJOPCD), IGI Global, vol. 9(2), pages 44-62, April.
    3. Jos Berge & Henk Kiers, 1991. "A numerical approach to the approximate and the exact minimum rank of a covariance matrix," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 56(2), pages 309-315, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Elisa I. Villena-Martínez & Juan José Rienda-Gómez & Dolores Lucía Sutil-Martín & Fernando E. García-Muiña, 2024. "Psychometric properties and factor structure of a motivation scale for higher education students to graduate and stimulate their entrepreneurship," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 1879-1906, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jushan Bai & Serena Ng, 2020. "Simpler Proofs for Approximate Factor Models of Large Dimensions," Papers 2008.00254, arXiv.org.
    2. Stegeman, Alwin, 2016. "A new method for simultaneous estimation of the factor model parameters, factor scores, and unique parts," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 189-203.
    3. Pison, Greet & Rousseeuw, Peter J. & Filzmoser, Peter & Croux, Christophe, 2003. "Robust factor analysis," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 84(1), pages 145-172, January.
    4. Jos Berge & Gregor Sočan, 2004. "The greatest lower bound to the reliability of a test and the hypothesis of unidimensionality," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 69(4), pages 613-625, December.
    5. Bai, Jushan & Ng, Serena, 2023. "Approximate factor models with weaker loadings," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 1893-1916.
    6. Xi Luo, 2011. "Recovering Model Structures from Large Low Rank and Sparse Covariance Matrix Estimation," Papers 1111.1133, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2013.
    7. Alwin Stegeman & Tam Lam, 2014. "Three-Mode Factor Analysis by Means of Candecomp/Parafac," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 79(3), pages 426-443, July.
    8. Laura Naka, 2023. "Conflicting Student Viewpoints about Online EFL Learning during the Covid-19 Pandemic: Focus on Effective Learning and Well-being," World Journal of English Language, Sciedu Press, vol. 13(2), pages 111-111, March.
    9. Freyaldenhoven, Simon, 2022. "Factor models with local factors — Determining the number of relevant factors," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 229(1), pages 80-102.
    10. Kohei Adachi, 2022. "Factor Analysis Procedures Revisited from the Comprehensive Model with Unique Factors Decomposed into Specific Factors and Errors," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 87(3), pages 967-991, September.
    11. Bai, Jushan & Ng, Serena, 2019. "Rank regularized estimation of approximate factor models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 212(1), pages 78-96.
    12. Alwin Stegeman, 2018. "Simultaneous Component Analysis by Means of Tucker3," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 83(1), pages 21-47, March.
    13. Jushan Bai & Serena Ng, 2017. "Principal Components and Regularized Estimation of Factor Models," Papers 1708.08137, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2017.
    14. Asena Albayrak & Ozkan Tutuncu, 2022. "Evaluation of the Psychometric Properties of the Ethnocentrism Scale," Journal of Economy Culture and Society, Istanbul University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 65(65), pages 47-59, June.
    15. Nebojsa S. Davcik, 2013. "The Use And Misuse Of Structural Equation Modeling In Management Research," Working Papers Series 2 13-07, ISCTE-IUL, Business Research Unit (BRU-IUL).
    16. Klaas Sijtsma, 2009. "On the Use, the Misuse, and the Very Limited Usefulness of Cronbach’s Alpha," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 74(1), pages 107-120, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:8:y:2019:i:5:p:132-:d:226751. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.