IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v14y2025i2p67-d1579207.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ableism and Employment: A Scoping Review of the Literature

Author

Listed:
  • Ramona H. Sharma

    (Canadian Institute for Inclusion and Citizenship, School of Social Work, The University of British Columbia (Okanagan), Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7, Canada)

  • Renée Asselin

    (Canadian Institute for Inclusion and Citizenship, School of Social Work, The University of British Columbia (Okanagan), Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7, Canada)

  • Timothy Stainton

    (Canadian Institute for Inclusion and Citizenship, School of Social Work, The University of British Columbia (Okanagan), Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7, Canada)

  • Rachelle Hole

    (Canadian Institute for Inclusion and Citizenship, School of Social Work, The University of British Columbia (Okanagan), Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7, Canada)

Abstract

Background : Ableism obstructs employment equity for disabled individuals. However, research lacks a comprehensive understanding of how ableism multidimensionally manifests across job types, disability types, stages of employment, and intersecting identities. Objectives: This scoping review examines how ableism affects disabled workers and jobseekers, as well as its impacts on employment outcomes, variations across disabilities and identities, and the best practices for addressing these. Eligibility Criteria: The included articles were 109 peer-reviewed empirical studies conducted in the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the UK, Ireland, Denmark, Sweden, Iceland, Norway, and Finland between 2018 and 2023. Sources of Evidence: Using terms related to disability, ableism, and employment, the databases searched included Sociology Collection, CINAHL, PsycInfo, Web of Science, SCOPUS, Education Source, Academic Search Complete, and ERIC. Charting Methods: Data were extracted in tabular form and analyzed through thematic narrative synthesis to identify study characteristics, ableist barriers within employment, intersectional factors, and best practices. Results: Ableism negatively impacts employment outcomes through barriers within the work environment, challenges in disclosing disabilities, insufficient accommodations, and workplace discrimination. Intersectional factors intensify inequities, particularly for BIPOC, women, and those with invisible disabilities. Conclusions: Systemic, intersectional strategies are needed to address ableism, improve policies, and foster inclusive workplace practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Ramona H. Sharma & Renée Asselin & Timothy Stainton & Rachelle Hole, 2025. "Ableism and Employment: A Scoping Review of the Literature," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-27, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:14:y:2025:i:2:p:67-:d:1579207
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/14/2/67/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/14/2/67/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:14:y:2025:i:2:p:67-:d:1579207. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.