IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i6p3337-d769713.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inclusive Design of Workspaces: Mixed Methods Approach to Understanding Users

Author

Listed:
  • Olivia Phoeby Narenthiran

    (Bartlett School of Architecture, University College London, London WC1H 0AY, UK)

  • Jose Torero

    (Department of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering, University College London, London WC1H 0AY, UK)

  • Michael Woodrow

    (Department of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering, University College London, London WC1H 0AY, UK)

Abstract

Accessible design within the built environment has often focused on mobility conditions and has recently widened to include mental health. Additionally, as one in seven are neurodivergent (including conditions such as ADHD, autism, dyslexia, and dyspraxia), this highlights a growing need for designing for ‘non-visible’ conditions in addition to mobility. Emphasised by the growing disability pay gap and the disability perception gap, people with disabilities are still facing discrimination and physical barriers within the workplace. This research aimed to identify key ways of reducing physical barriers faced by people with a disability and thus encourage more comfortable and productive use of workspaces for all. Once the need for designing for a spectrum of users and inclusive workspace design was understood, a survey was then circulated to students and staff at a large university in the UK (working remotely from home), with the aim of understanding how people have adapted their home spaces and what barriers they continue to face. Quantitative and qualitative results were compared to the literature read with key issues emerging, such as separating work and rest from spaces in bedrooms. The survey findings and literature were evaluated, extracting key performance-based goals (e.g., productivity and focus within a study space) and prescriptive design features (e.g., lighting, furniture, and thermal comfort), whilst also considering the inclusivity of these features. The key conclusion establishes that, to achieve maximum benefit, it is important to work with the users to understand specific needs and identify creative and inclusive solutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Olivia Phoeby Narenthiran & Jose Torero & Michael Woodrow, 2022. "Inclusive Design of Workspaces: Mixed Methods Approach to Understanding Users," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-29, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:6:p:3337-:d:769713
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/6/3337/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/6/3337/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chandola, Tarani & Rouxel, Patrick, 2021. "The role of workplace accommodations in explaining the disability employment gap in the UK," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    2. Oecd, 2021. "The future of remote work: Opportunities and policy options for Trentino," OECD Local Economic and Employment Development (LEED) Papers 2021/07, OECD Publishing.
    3. Kerstin Sailer & Petros Koutsolampros & Rosica Pachilova, 2021. "Differential perceptions of teamwork, focused work and perceived productivity as an effect of desk characteristics within a workplace layout," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(4), pages 1-19, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lisa Lim & Craig M. Zimring & Jennifer R. DuBose & Jaehoon Lee & Robert J. Stroebel & Marc R. Matthews, 2021. "Designing for Effective and Safe Multidisciplinary Primary Care Teamwork: Using the Time of COVID-19 as a Case Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-18, August.
    2. Ameri, Mason & Kruse, Douglas L. & Park, So Ri & Rodgers, Yana van der Meulen & Schur, Lisa, 2022. "Telework during the Pandemic: Patterns, Challenges, and Opportunities for People with Disabilities," IZA Discussion Papers 15755, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    3. Luiz Bueno Silva & Carmem Julianne Beserra Melo & Adriana Gomes Lisboa de Souza & Lucas Guedes de Oliveira, 2024. "Ergonomics, Health, and Perceptions about Remote Domestic Workposts: Study in Areas of City of João Pessoa, Paraíba, Brazil," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(7), pages 1-23, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:6:p:3337-:d:769713. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.